Re: [Tagging] values with ";" and overpass

On 14/07/2016 20:09, Bjoern Hassler wrote: way["line"="Jubilee"]({{bbox}}); Try: way["line"~"Jubilee"]({{bbox}}); ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] values with ";" and overpass

Hi Martin, thanks - very much appreciated!! Bjoern On 14 July 2016 at 20:30, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2016-07-14 21:09 GMT+02:00 Bjoern Hassler : > >> Of course, you could do a match on the value (rather than =), but I >> thought the point of the ";" was to separate multiple values? > >

Re: [Tagging] values with ";" and overpass

2016-07-14 21:09 GMT+02:00 Bjoern Hassler : > Of course, you could do a match on the value (rather than =), but I > thought the point of the ";" was to separate multiple values? see for example this http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Multiple_values and https://blog.jochentopf.com/2013-09-23-s

[Tagging] values with ";" and overpass

Hi all, Should a key="A;B" not match A and B in overpass? I guess it does not. For example, "line"="Jubilee;Piccadilly;Victoria" is retrieved only by way["line"="Jubilee;Piccadilly;Victoria"]({{bbox}}); and not by way["line"="Jubilee"]({{bbox}}); See these two links: http://overpass-turbo.eu/

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Hi all, thanks for comments. Makes me think about validation. Is there a validator that can be used to compare the accepted schemes to what the actual tagging is? For example, is it possible to validate against manually constructed schemes in JOSM? Is it possible to view osmose errors on certain o

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

2016-07-14 12:53 GMT+02:00 Kieron Thwaites : > Yes, it's two different tagging schemes. "station=subway" belongs to > the legacy station mapping scheme, while "subway=yes" belongs to the > more detailed (and more complex) public transport schema, and is (or > should be!) found together with a pub

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

On 14 July 2016 at 12:24, Bjoern Hassler wrote: > (1) both "line" and "tube" are in use to designate lines (e.g. > "Piccaddilly;Bakerloo"). Only one of them tends to be filled. I assume this > should all be "line"? I'd actually tag this as the name=* of the route_master relation. Open to hearing

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Hi all, hi Kieran, hi Richard, Another question: Looking at the stations, (1) both "line" and "tube" are in use to designate lines (e.g. "Piccaddilly;Bakerloo"). Only one of them tends to be filled. I assume this should all be "line"? (2) Also, I assume the ";" as a separator is correct? I.e. Pi

Re: [Tagging] Relations in Transport for London: network and operator

Bjoern Hassler wrote: > Second question: network. The wiki page > http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/London_public_transport_tagging_scheme > doesn't say much about "network", and these values are in use: > > - London Underground > - National Rail > - Network Rail > - London Overground > - TfL > -