On 24/02/2016 11:34 AM, Dave Swarthout wrote:
The reality is that most mappers don't pay any attention to this group
or the "decisions" we make. It's all well and good to make careful
deliberations about this tag or that one but in the end people will do
what they want. They will continue to ta
sent from a phone
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
sent from a phone
> Am 23.02.2016 um 23:55 schrieb Dominic Coletti :
>
> I feel like phone and fax are distinct to internet cafés, and should not be
> simply thrown out. Especially in developing countries where infrastructure is
> not as advanced.
yes, I can confirm this for Italy, also the
I agree that not all developing countries have internet cafés but I noticed
several such establishments in Africa, specifically Uganda. There, the tag
would be hugely beneficial.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 7:27 PM Dave Swarthout
wrote:
> Replying in part to Dominic's comment: Internet cafes are fai
The reality is that most mappers don't pay any attention to this group or
the "decisions" we make. It's all well and good to make careful
deliberations about this tag or that one but in the end people will do what
they want. They will continue to tag for the renderer, add tags that make
no sense or
Replying in part to Dominic's comment: Internet cafes are fairly rare here
in Thailand because Internet is available in almost every public venue;
hotels, coffee shops, even bars. What we do see are gaming rooms, full of
internet-connected computers and teenagers. While Thailand is not quite a
firs
Dear all,
The proposal to replace shop=jewelry by shop=jewellery has been rejected.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Jewellery_shop
The proposal received 40 votes for, 18 votes against, and 4
abstentions. The approval rate was 68.97%, which is less than the
required 74%.
It i
I feel like phone and fax are distinct to internet cafés, and should not be
simply thrown out. Especially in developing countries where infrastructure
is not as advanced.
On Tue, Feb 23, 2016 at 5:52 PM Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 24/02/2016 4:33 AM, Johnparis wrote:
>
> A place who
On 24/02/2016 4:33 AM, Johnparis wrote:
A place whose principal role is providing communication services
(internet, telephone and/or fax).
Telephone?
Fax?
Don't thing these are frequent?
No mention of coffee/tea/cake?
Nor a mention of additional services such as wifi, CD/DVD burning,
printin
On Tue, 23 Feb 2016 11:54:55 +
Andy Townsend wrote:
> On 23/02/2016 10:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> >
> > It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against
> > and 4 abstentions.
> > Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional
> > rejection; proposer to m
A place whose principal role is providing communication services (internet,
telephone and/or fax).
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Internet_cafe
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listi
On 23.02.2016 13:42, Andy Townsend wrote:
> As we've seen in at least one answer in this thread already,
you can say my name if you want to :)
> they've
> never actually mapped one but do "care about tagging" (i.e. in this case
> they want to tell _other people_ how to tag things that they haven'
Don't forget it doesn't really matter if the tag is jewelry or
jewellery. It's about having a uniform way of tagging. Who would vote
against that, I wonder? And if both values are currently considered
equivalent in OSM, changing existing data from one spelling to another
does not change the value o
On 23/02/2016 12:32, markus schnalke wrote:
Aren't the ones who vote those who care for what the actual
tagging is?
As we've seen in at least one answer in this thread already, they've
never actually mapped one but do "care about tagging" (i.e. in this case
they want to tell _other people_ ho
[2016-02-23 11:54] Andy Townsend
> >
> > It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against and
> > 4 abstentions.
> > Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional
> > rejection; proposer to make final call.
>
> The tricky bit of course is that those percentages a
And how much of 1100 mappers would really be interested ine the spelling
of the word? Only beacause you map something, doesnt mean that you care
about the tagging, me for example never tagged a jewelry (or jewellery
:)) shop, but I did care about the proposal.
So, of course, its a pitty that only
On 23 February 2016 at 12:54, Andy Townsend wrote:
> The tricky bit of course is that those percentages are "of the people who
> voted".
>
> Taginfo reckons objects with the key "shop" were last edited by 105 030
> different users, and there are 1,976,690 shops, of which 20,851 are jewelry
> and 2
On 23/02/2016 10:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against and
4 abstentions.
Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional
rejection; proposer to make final call.
The tricky bit of course is that those percentages are "of
On 23 February 2016 at 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> I feel voting count is broken for some time. Has there been a formal
> proceduce to change the way we count the votes? How was this procedure
> introduced?
>
> Example, the current jeweller voting:
> Voting closed
> Voting on this proposal
ok I don't have a neutral opinion on this proposal, but I think
especially here, if you want to change 20.000 tagged objects, it should
be three quarters.
On 23.02.2016 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> I feel voting count is broken for some time. Has there been a formal
> proceduce to change t
I feel voting count is broken for some time. Has there been a formal
proceduce to change the way we count the votes? How was this procedure
introduced?
Example, the current jeweller voting:
Voting closed
Voting on this proposal has been closed.
It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 v
21 matches
Mail list logo
