On 23 February 2016 at 11:33, Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> wrote: > I feel voting count is broken for some time. Has there been a formal > proceduce to change the way we count the votes? How was this procedure > introduced? > > Example, the current jeweller voting: > Voting closed > Voting on this proposal has been closed. > It was provisionally rejected with 40 votes for, 18 votes against and 4 > abstentions. > Approval rate: 68.97%. Less than required 74% so provisional rejection; > proposer to make final call.
For my proposals, I follow the currently documented process with 74% approval, and therefore consider the jewellery proposal rejected. However, I think a discussion about a lower threshold, and in general a formal approval of the voting guidelines by the community, would be very useful. -- Matthijs _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
