sent from a phone
> Am 13.12.2015 um 12:22 schrieb moltonel :
>
> Customer-only and non-gratis wifi are arguably not "public" but they are
> mapworthy. And the subtags to express these are internet_access:access and
> internet_access:fee (with the usual values of the access and fee tags).
+
You also get wifi hotspots built into domestic routers.
In the UK BT are the most common, in fact it is difficult to be in a
residential area and not see one.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BT_Wi-fi
Customers have access to these, and the public can sign up to use them.
These probably wouldn't b
On 13 December 2015 12:02:22 GMT+00:00, Richard wrote:
>On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:22:53AM +, moltonel wrote:
>> Customer-only and non-gratis wifi are arguably not "public" but they
>are mapworthy. And the subtags to express these are
>internet_access:access and internet_access:fee (with the
On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:22:53AM +, moltonel wrote:
>
>
> On 13 December 2015 00:08:16 GMT+00:00, Hans De Kryger
> wrote:
> >> What would be the point of tagging non-public Wi-Fi?
> >>
> >> Do you mean Wi-Fi for customer use only?
> >>
> >My bad i meant (wifi_public=yes)
> > and i
Thanks everyone for your responses!
On Dec 13, 2015 4:22 AM, "moltonel" wrote:
>
>
> On 13 December 2015 00:08:16 GMT+00:00, Hans De Kryger <
> hans.dekryge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> What would be the point of tagging non-public Wi-Fi?
> >>
> >> Do you mean Wi-Fi for customer use only?
> >>
On 13 December 2015 00:08:16 GMT+00:00, Hans De Kryger
wrote:
>> What would be the point of tagging non-public Wi-Fi?
>>
>> Do you mean Wi-Fi for customer use only?
>>
>My bad i meant (wifi_public=yes)
> and i'm not sure that tag would be necessary at all. Public wifi
>should only be ta
