On 13 December 2015 12:02:22 GMT+00:00, Richard <ricoz....@gmail.com> wrote: >On Sun, Dec 13, 2015 at 11:22:53AM +0000, moltonel wrote: >> Customer-only and non-gratis wifi are arguably not "public" but they >are mapworthy. And the subtags to express these are >internet_access:access and internet_access:fee (with the usual values >of the access and fee tags). > >Depends on how you interpret customer-only: I would map internet cafes >which >are customer-only but not hotel wifis which are available only for >overnight >guests.
By definition, overnight guests are customers. While some hotels do not mind if you come in just for the wifi without even buying a coffee, some will. In my experience, most free wifi is actually (intended to be) customers-only, even if most osm contributors don't bother to tag it. >Also would not map hotspots which require eg a monthly subscription. Do you make a difference between monthly and sorter timespan ? Is tacit reconduction the issue ? In any case, the *:fee tag should be used. When you're abroad, even a cumbersome signup process might be worth it. -- Vincent Dp _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
