[Tagging] RFC - Level:ref=*

2015-11-13 Thread johnw
I created an RFC page for level:ref=* I look forward to your comments. here or on the discussion page. http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/level:ref PS: I will create it’s cousins, addr:unit:ref later. having th

Re: [Tagging] Does Google lack data?

2015-11-13 Thread Greg Troxel
Martin Koppenhoefer writes: > the Google logo is there because they use the Google API to display the > map. > It is a requirement from the Google API. You can see it here in the source > code: > https://maps.googleapis.com/maps/api/js?key=...&libraries=geometry,places&sensor=true&language=ru

Re: [Tagging] amenity=bicycle_repair_station

2015-11-13 Thread Andy Townsend
On 10/11/2015 02:41, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: amenity=bicycle_repair_station has a problem: it's attracting lots of active tagging of shops offering bicycle repair. For example: http://www.openstreetmap.org/node/3772809894 and http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/337421757 That was not the intent.

Re: [Tagging] Named junctions

2015-11-13 Thread johnw
> On Nov 13, 2015, at 7:46 PM, tomoya muramoto wrote: > However officially (legally) the name is "place" name. It causes some > problems. I understood it to be the signals were named after the places - not the places themselves.And only *sometimes* named for places. Places are named with pl

Re: [Tagging] Named junctions

2015-11-13 Thread tomoya muramoto
In Japan, a name plate is attached to a traffic signal, but the name is widely recognized as "junction" name. So I think it's reasonable to tag it as a junction. However officially (legally) the name is "place" name. It causes some problems. Small problem: No junction http://www.openstreetmap.org

Re: [Tagging] Does Google lack data?

2015-11-13 Thread Martin Koppenhoefer
2015-11-13 4:43 GMT+01:00 André Pirard : > I've been surprised when Searching Google for Щорса Кричев > > to find the result Остановка - Щорса - Кричев - WikiRoutes.info >