2015-07-28 23:59 GMT+02:00 Hubert :
> On 28. Juli 2015 22:32 Ruben Maes [mailto:ruben.mae...@gmail.com] wrote:
>>2015-07-25 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Townsend :
>>> It's also perhaps worth mentioning that the 18th Feb change (which you
>>> - and I - preferred the previous version to) was made by a wiki
For clarification: I didn't write that.
On 28. Juli 2015 22:32 Ruben Maes [mailto:ruben.mae...@gmail.com] wrote:
>2015-07-25 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Townsend :
>> On 25/07/2015 13:43, Hubert wrote:
>> It's also perhaps worth mentioning that the 18th Feb change (which you
>> - and I - preferred the pr
2015-07-25 15:24 GMT+02:00 Andy Townsend :
> On 25/07/2015 13:43, Hubert wrote:
> It's also perhaps worth mentioning that the 18th Feb
> change (which you - and I - preferred the previous version to) was made by a
> wiki editor who's since been blocked (3).
>
> (3) http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wik
sent from a phone
> Am 28.07.2015 um 17:57 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo :
>
> That said, I don't see a better tag that your style could use to
> decide displaying that road
rather than adding a tag: "render like a primary" you should check what it is
that you are after (e.g. maintenance entity/
uto, 28. srp 2015. 11:53 Martin Koppenhoefer je
napisao:
from what you have written it seems to me that these are tagging errors:
if a road "works as primary" it should get the primary tag in osm.
Country specific deviations that result from following different criteria
(like road maintenance
On 28/07/2015 17:35, Hubert wrote:
FYI: I just took the liberty of changing the highway=footway definition back to
the pre Feb 18th Version.
\o/
Thanks for that.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
https://lists.openstreetmap.org/l
FYI: I just took the liberty of changing the highway=footway definition back to
the pre Feb 18th Version.
>-Original Message-
>From: Andy Townsend [mailto:ajt1...@gmail.com]
>Sent: Samstag, 25. Juli 2015 15:25
>To: tagging@openstreetmap.org
>Subject: Re: [Tagging] access=designated wiki
>
sent from a phone
> Am 28.07.2015 um 16:14 schrieb moltonel 3x Combo :
>
> Sorry but no, too simplistic. A lot of local OSM communities follow
> the official national road classification where possible.
That's too simplistic ;-)
>
> That ideal doesn't match the practical reality. highway=p
On 28/07/2015, Pavel Zbytovský wrote:
> Since nobody objected much, i would probably go with
> works_as_highway=primary - i think it reflects the state of reality, so its
> useful to be added in OSM dataset.
FWIW, I'm not a big fan of this, because it is just a variation of
tagging for the render
> On Jul 28, 2015, at 8:29 AM, moltonel 3x Combo wrote:
>
> One routing error that came up recently is a trunk with a lower than
> typical maxspeed, and a trunk_link without a maxspeed tag. The router
> used its default idea of maxspeed for that link, and tried to use it
> as a shortcut. The rou
On 28/07/2015, Marc Gemis wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:14 PM, moltonel 3x Combo
> wrote:
>
>> That ideal doesn't match the practical reality. highway=primary has a
>> very different definition between Ethiopia and Germany, by necessity.
>
> While they can be very different, a router should
Thanks for updates, yes, we have similar rules as Ireland.
Since nobody objected much, i would probably go with
works_as_highway=primary - i think it reflects the state of reality, so its
useful to be added in OSM dataset.
Regards,
Pavel
út 28. 7. 2015 v 16:33 odesílatel Marc Gemis napsal:
>
>
On Tue, Jul 28, 2015 at 4:14 PM, moltonel 3x Combo
wrote:
> That ideal doesn't match the practical reality. highway=primary has a
> very different definition between Ethiopia and Germany, by necessity.
>
While they can be very different, a router should still be able to prefer a
primary road to
On 28/07/2015, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> Am 28.07.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Pavel Zbytovský :
>>
>> 1) technically the small secondary roads part works as primary road
>> network. So we would suggest a tag similar to works_as_highway=primary. Do
>> you think its ok? Any suggestions?
>
>
> from wha
sent from a phone
> Am 28.07.2015 um 11:29 schrieb Kotya Karapetyan :
>
> information=reception
I see information slightly different from reception: information is for
everybody and does not include something like a kind of check in, a reception
treats people different according to who they
On 28/07/2015 7:29 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote:
Hi Warin,
After looking at all these proposals and the related discussions, I
would actually strongly suggest going for information=reception:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information.
Nice thought ... but .. that key is used under th
sent from a phone
> Am 28.07.2015 um 11:02 schrieb Pavel Zbytovský :
>
> 1) technically the small secondary roads part works as primary road network.
> So we would suggest a tag similar to works_as_highway=primary. Do you think
> its ok? Any suggestions?
from what you have written it seems
Hi Warin,
After looking at all these proposals and the related discussions, I would
actually strongly suggest going for information=reception:
https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Key:information.
1) We wanted to avoid confusion between reception as place and reception as
an event and reception as
Hi,
we have a following issue at mapy.cz (zooms cca <13 are OSM data). We try
to render primary road overview in Czech republic, so the drivers could
easily see where its possible to drive. But sometimes the primary road ends
and continues as a secondary road - it could be in cites, or possibly
te
19 matches
Mail list logo
