Re: [Tagging] tagging large intersections cross-road sections

Actually it only works properly with a fixed-width font. Proportional fonts have some characters wider than others. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." -- Martin Luther King,

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wedding_reception

On 24/06/2015 10:46 PM, althio wrote: On 24 June 2015 at 14:36, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: (I note that event_venue is not on the wiki so I am unable to find what restrictions this would place on its use other than the amenity key.) Low

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wedding_reception

I have addressed this issue .. and changed the proposal to a property value. Please read the proposal as it now stands... http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/wedding_reception There is little there at the moment, some 500 words. . On 24/06/2015 10:15 PM, John Eldredge wrote:

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wedding_reception

On 24 June 2015 at 14:36, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > (I note that event_venue is not on the wiki so I am unable to find what > restrictions this would place on its use other than the amenity key.) > Low numbers but the wiki page exists: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity

Re: [Tagging] tagging large intersections cross-road sections

sent from a phone > Am 24.06.2015 um 11:08 schrieb Florian Lohoff : > > motorway_link is not a different highway type - Its some attribute which > slipped into the highway type. I don't agree. It might work to treat these like motorways with a link attribute, but they seem at least to be muc

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wedding_reception

On 24/06/2015 8:47 PM, André Pirard wrote: Hi, For what Marc describes, I've been recommended this (it's in Belgium). building yes amenity

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wedding_reception

As a native speaker of English, I agree with you. A wedding reception is an event, not a place, and other types of receptions (events) are likely to use the same space. The location would best be tagged reception_area or reception_hall. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cann

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wedding_reception

Hi, For what Marc describes, I've been recommended this (it's in Belgium). building yes amenity events_venue

Re: [Tagging] tagging large intersections cross-road sections

Florian Lohoff wrote: > On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:51:08AM +0200, Tom Pfeifer wrote: >> Do we have better alternatives? Should we leave the snippet sections unnamed? > > I'd love routing people to speak up - I'd prefer to not name them and > tag them according to be a crossing link. Three points h

Re: [Tagging] tagging large intersections cross-road sections

Hola, On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 10:51:08AM +0200, Tom Pfeifer wrote: > I agree that this is the trickiest situation, so I pick either name from N or > S, > preferably the more significant road. Thus the driver coming from E will get > announced "turn left into N, then straight on S". > >N >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - reception_point

On 24/06/2015 5:54 PM, Kotya Karapetyan wrote: Hi, I wonder: Could we try to slightly change the proposal/RFC process to make the community develop the good solution? It is obvious that only a small amount of people voted against the proposal as such, thinking it's not useful. The majority co

Re: [Tagging] tagging large intersections cross-road sections

ASCII art only works with proportional font: S N S N WWW*WWW*EEE S N S N WWW*EEE*EEE S N S N Marc Gemis wrote on 2015-06-24 09:15: but this does not work for the cases where there is only 1 OSM way for S & N. > Suppose S & N do not form a dual carriage way and th

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - wedding_reception

On 24/06/2015 3:46 PM, John Willis wrote: + 1 to everything below said by Marc Wedding reception is the name of the party, not the mappable venue. A particular kind of 'party'. There are wedding themed event halls all over japan - they love the idea of a western wedding in a "church" (they

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - reception_point

Hi, I wonder: Could we try to slightly change the proposal/RFC process to make the community develop the good solution? It is obvious that only a small amount of people voted against the proposal as such, thinking it's not useful. The majority complained about the specific wording. We could put se

Re: [Tagging] tagging large intersections cross-road sections

> > > >S N >S N > WWW*WWW*EEE >S N >S N > WWW*EEE*EEE >S N >S N > > but this does not work for the cases where there is only 1 OSM way for S & N. Suppose S & N do not form a dual carriage way and the name of the road changes at the crossing, N in the north, S in