[Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - Sanitary Dump Station / Elsan Point / CDP

http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Sanitary_Dump_Station Dump station, dump point, caravan dump station, pumpout, sanitary station, Elsan disposal point (UK) and chemical dump point (CDP). It seems universal that people use euphemisms for human waste: there are a lot of name.

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

On 21/02/2015 2:43 PM, David Bannon wrote: Warin (and Bryce), would it be appropriate to cross reference this proposal with the one for amenity=sanitary_dump_station ?? They clearly relate to each other and voters may need to consider both. I consider those that vote against either .. would/sh

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

Warin (and Bryce), would it be appropriate to cross reference this proposal with the one for amenity=sanitary_dump_station ?? They clearly relate to each other and voters may need to consider both. Should it be documented how to handle a situation if both get up ? While Bryce's proposal covers a

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Draft - Sanitary Dump Station

Bryce, given the discussion that took place on the mailing list prior to you hitting the wiki, maybe its time you (as proposer) started the clock ? So, if you declare today start of RFC, two weeks, start voting ? David On Wed, 2015-02-18 at 23:23 -0800, Bryce Nesbitt wrote: > It's clear there'

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

Given that both the multiple-path and single-path definitions are in use, the OSM definition of labyrinth should not exclude either one. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkness; only light can do that. Hate cannot drive out hate; only love can do that." Dr

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

Sent from my iPhone > On Feb 20, 2015, at 9:47 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer > wrote: > > > 2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum : >> So it would become: >> shop=vehicle_storage >> covered=yes >> motorcar=yes >> caravan=yes > > > I wouldn't use the "shop" key but something like "amenity", a

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

Various "new age" spiritual communities have a strong definition of labyrinth: it's one path, no dead ends, leading to a center. There are dozens in my area. The term is widespread and common, as is the feature. The one path labyrinth is a mappable feature in OSM, even if Merriam Webster has not

Re: [Tagging] building=yes on nodes?

In a discussion with Ivan Gayton of MSF on this subject and his view on the humanitarian angle isthey prefer the "area" to be shown rather than the node. They use the area in estimating the number of occupants (for which they have worked out an average table for the areas they require). So wher

Re: [Tagging] building=yes on nodes?

Okay. I’ll adapt the few remaining building=* value wiki pages that do not allow nodes  … 2015-02-17 0:32 GMT, Dave Swarthout : > On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 1:30 AM, Dan S wrote: > >> All building=* on nodes is fine. As others have pointed out, it is >> often necessary in HOT aerial mapping when we

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

On 21/02/2015 1:28 AM, Marc Gemis wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com > wrote: On 19/02/2015 9:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: 2015-02-18 23:09 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

Here is the definition from my Merriam'Webster dictionary: 1 a : a place constructed of or full of intricate passageways and blind alleys   b : a maze (as in a garden) formed by paths separated by high hedges 2 : something extremely complex or tortuous in structure, arrangement, or character : 

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

On Fri, Feb 20, 2015 at 11:24 AM, John F. Eldredge wrote: > Labyrinths aren't usually defined as having only one way through them. > They normally have side passages, although, like other mazes, there may be > only one path that will succeed in taking you all of the way to the exit. > Incorrect

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

Labyrinths aren't usually defined as having only one way through them. They normally have side passages, although, like other mazes, there may be only one path that will succeed in taking you all of the way to the exit. -- John F. Eldredge -- j...@jfeldredge.com "Darkness cannot drive out darkn

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

The maze/labyrinth distinction is there. When I hear of modern labyrinths, it's usually in the context of religious/spiritual uses (since there's only one way, it lends itself to a walking meditation). Mazes are generally like a recreational puzzle, where you're trying to find your way. Whether th

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - key:waste_collection

On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 19/02/2015 9:59 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > 2015-02-18 23:09 GMT+01:00 Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com>: > >> https://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/waste_collection >> > > Isn't there a lot of overla

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - power_supply=intermittent

Sure, see my feedback there. On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:35:43 AM François Lacombe wrote: > Hi, > > I've put some feedbacks on the Talk page of this proposal. > > It would be good to discuss those points before the vote start. > > > Cheers. > > *François Lacombe* > > fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot

[Tagging] restricted *way=* with additional access

Am 19.02.2015 um 18:05 schrieb Pieren: > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 12:38 PM, Richard Z. wrote: > >> How is routing software supposed to know that some aerialway=goods are >> actually taking passengers? > > like roads tagged with "access=no" or "private". Or > "highway=pedestrian" not allowed for c

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

2015-02-20 13:42 GMT+01:00 Jan van Bekkum : > So it would become: > shop=vehicle_storage > covered=yes > motorcar=yes > caravan=yes > I wouldn't use the "shop" key but something like "amenity", and "motorcar" is a legal access restriction, so should be something different as well. cheers, Marti

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

Thanks again, makes sense. What is the best way to map what vehicles the storage is intended for? motorcar=yes? Access=motorcar, access=caravan would duplicate the key So it would become: shop=vehicle_storage covered=yes motorcar=yes caravan=yes On Fri Feb 20 2015 at 9:35:09 AM johnw wrote: >

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - power_supply=intermittent

Hi, I've put some feedbacks on the Talk page of this proposal. It would be good to discuss those points before the vote start. Cheers. *François Lacombe* fl dot infosreseaux At gmail dot com www.infos-reseaux.com @InfosReseaux 2015-02-18 9:22 GMT+01:00 M

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - RFC - parking=storage: additional values for key parking

> On Feb 20, 2015, at 12:04 PM, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > > On 20/02/2015 1:22 PM, johnw wrote: >> I think he’s trying to say that “a storage amenity” is different from "a >> parking amenity”, because it is not something you would seek out on the map >> when looking for parking (ev

Re: [Tagging] ?=maze

On 19 February 2015 at 00:04, Warin <61sundow...@gmail.com> wrote: > leisure=maze 77 > attraction=maze 147 > > So the usage is split about even.. Looks more like 1:2 to me. -- Andy Mabbett @pigsonthewing http://pigsonthewing.org.uk ___ Tagging mailin