2011/11/27 Greg Troxel :
> Instead of shop=pastry, I would say shop=bakery bakery=pastry, because
> then the bakery rules work, for data consumers that don't know/care
> about pastry. And, in the grand ontology we are avoiding building, a
> pastry shop is generally a kind of bakery.
Thing is, it
Wouldn't it make more sense to have shop=bakery
bread=yes (the default)
pastry=yes (when they have pätisserie/banketgebak)
chocolates=yes (if they have fine chocolate sweets)
or something of the kind. I think this is more consistent with other
schemes.
We also make a difference between 'warme ba
On 11/27/2011 11:19 AM, Greg Troxel wrote:
I am not aware of any
that sell cake only, and not other kinds of dessert.
http://www.chocomoosebakery.com/ is probably very close: cake plus one
or two additional items.
Instead of shop=pastry, I would say shop=bakery bakery=pastry, because
then t
Martin Koppenhoefer writes:
> I'd like to propose shop=pastry. (Currently there are 13 of these
> according to taginfo)
>
> There is some recommendations for similar features
>
> 1.
> amenity=cafe
> cuisine=cake
>
> and
>
> 2.
> shop=confectionery
>
> I interpret the first as a place to sit and
I'd like to propose shop=pastry. (Currently there are 13 of these
according to taginfo)
There is some recommendations for similar features
1.
amenity=cafe
cuisine=cake
and
2.
shop=confectionery
I interpret the first as a place to sit and the second seems to be
more suitable for candy and/or sh
