Wouldn't it make more sense to have shop=bakery bread=yes (the default) pastry=yes (when they have pätisserie/banketgebak) chocolates=yes (if they have fine chocolate sweets)
or something of the kind. I think this is more consistent with other schemes. We also make a difference between 'warme bakker' (everything is prepared in-house) en 'koude' bakker. The products are prepared either in another 'warme bakker' or industrially. Jo 2011/11/27 Greg Troxel <[email protected]> > > Martin Koppenhoefer <[email protected]> writes: > > > I'd like to propose shop=pastry. (Currently there are 13 of these > > according to taginfo) > > > > There is some recommendations for similar features > > > > 1. > > amenity=cafe > > cuisine=cake > > > > and > > > > 2. > > shop=confectionery > > > > I interpret the first as a place to sit and the second seems to be > > more suitable for candy and/or shops selling industrially produced > > sweets (at least that's the impression I get from the wiki), while > > shop=pastry would be intended for shops similar to shop=bakery, but > > specialized in sweet temptations. > > Not what you asked, but it seems to me that a key problem is that the > set of valid tags effectively defines a taxonomy, and then imposes on > any user of the data the need to represent and use the taxonomy. We > seem not to talk about this, but I think it's a significant issue and we > should. > > In general, I think it makes sense to have a number of examples in mind > when making up tagging schemes. > > Using subtags, rather than new top-level tags, means that data consumers > that don't know about the subtag still get more or less the right > answer, as opposed to "other". > > So your option 1 seems reasonable, when it's a sit-down kind of place. > I might suggest cuisine=dessert. There are a number of places around me > that are basically places to sit down and have a "plated dessert" and > coffee. ("plated" means it is served on a plate with a knife and fork, > as opposed to sold in a box to be taken home.) I am not aware of any > that sell cake only, and not other kinds of dessert. > > Instead of shop=pastry, I would say shop=bakery bakery=pastry, because > then the bakery rules work, for data consumers that don't know/care > about pastry. And, in the grand ontology we are avoiding building, a > pastry shop is generally a kind of bakery. > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > Tagging mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging > >
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
