Hi! Since there were no comments for two weeks, I've pushed both
proposals to voting stage.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/direction
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Relations/Proposed/Directional_node
IZ
___
Tagging mailing
On Thu, 25 Aug 2011, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
I disagree here. If the external source is "ground truth", then
that's the data that should take precedence. A car share operator
for example won't want a disused location shown, and may well make
that a requirement of permitting the merge-sort. An
On 08/25/2011 05:39 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
if the data is "mastered elsewhere", don't import it into OSM.
If OSM is just a unique repository of hand collected data, sure, that's
right.
If OSM is an end result (e.g. published maps) then we should be talking
about how valuable the parti
On 8/25/2011 9:01 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On 08/25/2011 05:35 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 8:25 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On 08/25/2011 04:34 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 7:28 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
With layer=X I mean you must enter the building to drink the water.
On 08/25/2011 05:35 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 8:25 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On 08/25/2011 04:34 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 7:28 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
With layer=X I mean you must enter the building to drink the water.
Not if there's an outside stairway that le
2011/8/26 Bryce Nesbitt :
>> My only technical comment regarding your script is that we usually put the
>> source tag(s) on the changeset, not the individual node, nowadays.
> But I'd like to keep source tags on the node, so hand mappers can understand
> that the data is mastered elsewhere.
if t
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:31 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> On 08/25/2011 03:27 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
>
>> Another problem which you don't seem to solve is the relationship of
>> imported and already existing data; it seems that in your particular case
>> you evaluated the situation by hand before
On 8/25/2011 8:25 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On 08/25/2011 04:34 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 7:28 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
With layer=X I mean you must enter the building to drink the water.
Not if there's an outside stairway that leads to a terrace.
Then how would you tag each co
On 08/25/2011 03:27 PM, Frederik Ramm wrote:
Another problem which you don't seem to solve is the relationship of
imported and already existing data; it seems that in your particular
case you evaluated the situation by hand before importing. This is
often one of the more complicated things to d
On 08/25/2011 04:34 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 7:28 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
With layer=X I mean you must enter the building to drink the water.
Not if there's an outside stairway that leads to a terrace.
Then how would you tag each combination and permutation of the given
condi
On 8/25/2011 7:28 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
With layer=X I mean you must enter the building to drink the water.
Not if there's an outside stairway that leads to a terrace.
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.o
On 08/25/2011 01:40 PM, John F. Eldredge wrote:
It is also possible that an outdoor drinking fountain, located at ground level,
might have an elevated walkway or other structure above it, and thus be tagged
with level=0.
Oooh.
I meant "level" as in floor: http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Lev
On 8/25/2011 7:17 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
On 08/25/2011 01:24 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 4:17 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Does anyone have a problem with the use of level=X to imply indoor=yes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Drinking_water_attributes
It's p
On 08/25/2011 01:24 PM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On 8/25/2011 4:17 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Does anyone have a problem with the use of level=X to imply indoor=yes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Drinking_water_attributes
It's possible that a fountain is on an upstairs p
I'm writing to get feedback and peer review on a new python module to
manage imports. And yes I am aware of the various concerns and issues
with imports, and the strong feelings they create.
The goal of this module is to help make imports more robust and correct
over the long haul. As a side
It is also possible that an outdoor drinking fountain, located at ground level,
might have an elevated walkway or other structure above it, and thus be tagged
with level=0.
Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 8/25/2011 4:17 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
> > Does anyone have a problem with the use of leve
On 8/25/2011 4:17 PM, Bryce Nesbitt wrote:
Does anyone have a problem with the use of level=X to imply indoor=yes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Drinking_water_attributes
It's possible that a fountain is on an upstairs porch.
___
Does anyone have a problem with the use of level=X to imply indoor=yes?
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Drinking_water_attributes
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 08/25/2011 07:30 AM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
2011/8/24 Bryce Nesbitt:
We have another "type" which is a shop that has registered with an
authority, promising to fill people's personal bottles on request.
I recently discovered a "vending_machine" which sells water into
brought bottles at 1
There's a piece of road here that recently got a sidewalk on the west
side. But they didn't include a couple pieces where there's extra
pavement on the side with diagonal lines to keep vehicles off. This is
obviously meant as part of the sidewalk, but it's technically not one.
How should it be
On 8/25/2011 10:54 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote:
2011/8/25 Anthony mailto:o...@inbox.org>>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Nathan Edgars II
mailto:nerou...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> On 8/25/2011 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote:
>>
>> - it is disputed whether to draw two ways where
2011/8/25 Anthony
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Nathan Edgars II
> wrote:
> > On 8/25/2011 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote:
> >>
> >> - it is disputed whether to draw two ways where two lanes are divided by
> >> a traffic island
> >
> > Really?
>
> Simone, are you referring there to a painte
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 10:44 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On 8/25/2011 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote:
>>
>> - it is disputed whether to draw two ways where two lanes are divided by
>> a traffic island
>
> Really?
Simone, are you referring there to a painted island?
On 8/25/2011 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo wrote:
- it is disputed whether to draw two ways where two lanes are divided by
a traffic island
Really?
Considering the above, I can hardly see how a crossing (either for
pedestrians or cyclists or horsemen) would deserve its own way
(especially a highway
> I recently discovered a "vending_machine" which sells water into
> brought bottles at 15ct/litre IIRR.
5ct I think
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
2011/8/24 Bryce Nesbitt :
> We have another "type" which is a shop that has registered with an
> authority, promising to fill people's personal bottles on request.
I recently discovered a "vending_machine" which sells water into
brought bottles at 15ct/litre IIRR.
http://www.23hq.com/dieterdreist
2011/8/24 Bryce Nesbitt :
> On 08/23/2011 06:49 PM, Martin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> If you are doing an import you should check beforehand if there is
>> already a drinking water fountain in OSM mapped to avoid duplicates.
>
> I do a proximity check
that's good to read
>: however there is a probl
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:50 AM, Simone Saviolo
wrote:
> 2011/8/25 Anthony
>> That's what's said, anyway. Personally I've always considered it
>> false to say that these two lanes aren't physically separated. Those
>> lines drawn on the ground aren't figments of my imagination.
>
> I can unders
2011/8/24 Bryce Nesbitt :
> Seems like it needs an operator= tag (e.g. operator=lamar)
+1, this is already covered in the advertising proposal [1], IMHO
there is no reason for this billboard proposal to reinvent a duplicate
tag for the same thing. Zverik noted this already at 11th of may on
the d
2011/8/25 Josh Doe
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo
> wrote:
> > Considering the above, I can hardly see how a crossing (either for
> > pedestrians or cyclists or horsemen) would deserve its own way
> (especially a
> > highway=*). The only "need" for it - and mind it, it seems q
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo
wrote:
> Woah, stop :-) What I meant is:
> - we've always said that each way should represent a linear feature;
> - for highways, this means a carriageway. If a road has a single two-way
> carriageway, i.e., if a car going from A to B can go on the o
2011/8/25 Anthony
> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo
> wrote:
> > Woah, stop :-) What I meant is:
> > - we've always said that each way should represent a linear feature;
> > - for highways, this means a carriageway. If a road has a single two-way
> > carriageway, i.e., if a car g
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:30 AM, Simone Saviolo
wrote:
> Woah, stop :-) What I meant is:
> - we've always said that each way should represent a linear feature;
> - for highways, this means a carriageway. If a road has a single two-way
> carriageway, i.e., if a car going from A to B can go on the o
2011/8/25 Nathan Edgars II
> On 8/24/2011 8:59 PM, Anthony wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 8:31 PM, Nathan Edgars II
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 8/24/2011 8:07 PM, Anthony wrote:
>>>
On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 4:37 AM, Nathan Edgars II
wrote:
>
> On 8/24/2011 3:44 AM, Simon
34 matches
Mail list logo
