On Fri, Jan 21, 2011 at 1:03 AM, Paul Johnson wrote:
> On 01/17/2011 01:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul Johnson
>> wrote:
>>> Tagging single-aspect signals seems excessive overkill, given the
>>> propensity of single aspect signals and their standard usage
On 01/17/2011 01:38 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 17, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Paul Johnson
> wrote:
>> Tagging single-aspect signals seems excessive overkill, given the
>> propensity of single aspect signals and their standard usage emphasizing
>> other traffic control devices (particularly
When a railway runs down the middle of a street (meaning one can drive
on the tracks as long as no train is present), where should a
railway=level_crossing node be placed? At every intersection (other
than those where you are prohibited from turning across the tracks by
turn restrictions)? Only at
boundary=protected_area seems to have established a strong de facto status, and
boundary=national_park + boundary:type=protected_area seems to be the
compromise taken to get things to render.
In the interest of providing more meaningful data about public lands in the US
I'm planning to apply th
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> What was the reason for the change?
>
>
>
Reason is that some nature reserves are partially or totaly covering
maritime areas and the coastline disappeared with solid rendering.
Pieren
___
Tag
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 10:09 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> But the same (adding landcover information) also applies to
> conservation and parks, which are still rendered as solid fills. What
> was the reason for the change?
You'll have to ask the people working on Mapnik. It's our task to
speci
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 3:01 AM, Andre Engels wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
>> I see that leisure=nature_reserve is now rendered "transparently"
>> (example:
>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.7687&lon=-81.4594&zoom=12&layers=M).
>> Does this mean that th
On Thu, Jan 20, 2011 at 8:03 AM, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
> I see that leisure=nature_reserve is now rendered "transparently"
> (example:
> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?lat=28.7687&lon=-81.4594&zoom=12&layers=M).
> Does this mean that there should be another landuse-type tag on it as
> well? It l
