On 12/10/2010 23:02, Brad Neuhauser wrote:
If you go to edit a OSM wiki page, just to the right of Save Page |
Show Preview | Show Changes is a link for "Editing Help", which does
go to a page with links which will help in editing, including the wiki
markup.
Yes. I came across that page a w
They don't all have to be highway/railways. Drains, pedestrian
walkways, any ground level object, and overhead cables could all count
in that 11.
Steve (contributing to the spam)
On Wed, Oct 13, 2010 at 8:21 AM, Lennard wrote:
> On 12-10-2010 20:49, Lennard wrote:
>
>> I'd rather not see an
If you go to edit a OSM wiki page, just to the right of Save Page | Show
Preview | Show Changes is a link for "Editing Help", which does go to a page
with links which will help in editing, including the wiki markup.
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:09 AM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> 2010/10/12 Dave F.
On 12-10-2010 20:49, Lennard wrote:
I'd rather not see an expansion of the integer -5 .. 5 range. Can anyone
point out any area where there are more than 16 crossing highways/railways?
Make that 11. :D
--
Lennard
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@op
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 9:56 PM, Elizabeth Dodd wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:06:44 +0200
> Peter Körner wrote:
>
> > I can follow this argumentation but it makes it hard to have two sets
> > of rules to follow when creating tag-pages in the wiki.
>
> There are few rules regarding the wiki.
>
On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 21:06:44 +0200
Peter Körner wrote:
> I can follow this argumentation but it makes it hard to have two sets
> of rules to follow when creating tag-pages in the wiki.
There are few rules regarding the wiki.
I have not voted (because voting on the wiki is ridiculous) but whether
Am 12.10.2010 18:02, schrieb M∡rtin Koppenhoefer:
Am 12. Oktober 2010 17:31 schrieb Matthias Meißer:
We identified the problem on the german mailinglist:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9586
I think there is a different problem, as the user who removed the item
from the map-feat
On 12-10-2010 19:15, Phil! Gold wrote:
How true is that these days? It's still in the JOSM presets, but a) I
don't see any reason in principle that should be true, and my reading of
the Mapnik rendering rules seems to indicate that any number of
(integer-based) levels would be rendered correctl
* M∡rtin Koppenhoefer [2010-10-12 18:11 +0200]:
> Layer's range is from -5 to 5.
How true is that these days? It's still in the JOSM presets, but a) I
don't see any reason in principle that should be true, and my reading of
the Mapnik rendering rules seems to indicate that any number of
(integer
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:04 PM, Colin Smale wrote:
> What layer is the road on which connects the rest of the road network at
> ground level (layer=0) to the bridge itself (layer=n>0)? I seem to remember
> a discussion about joining ways on different layers..can't remember the full
> conclusion
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 12:11 PM, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
wrote:
> 2010/10/12 Nathan Edgars II :
>> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Pieren wrote:
>>> "layer" is just saying what is on the top when two objects/lines are
>>> crossing each other. If you have only one element, the layer tag is really
>
2010/10/12 Nathan Edgars II :
> On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Pieren wrote:
>> "layer" is just saying what is on the top when two objects/lines are
>> crossing each other. If you have only one element, the layer tag is really
>> optionnal (this until someone is tracing what is below).
> Even i
On 12/10/2010 06:39, Peter Budny wrote:
I've noticed that some bridges and tunnels I've edited previously no
longer have layer=* tags on them. I could swear they did before. Is
there some bot (or person) going through and removing them?
There was a bot a couple of years ago that ADDED layer t
On 12/10/2010 17:51, Nathan Edgars II wrote:
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Pieren wrote:
"layer" is just saying what is on the top when two objects/lines are
crossing each other. If you have only one element, the layer tag is really
optionnal (this until someone is tracing what is below).
Am 12. Oktober 2010 17:31 schrieb Matthias Meißer :
> We identified the problem on the german mailinglist:
> http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9586
What about closing the forum and redirecting them to the mailing-list
archive? There is always complaints in the forum, that nobody tol
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 11:26 AM, Pieren wrote:
> "layer" is just saying what is on the top when two objects/lines are
> crossing each other. If you have only one element, the layer tag is really
> optionnal (this until someone is tracing what is below).
Even if you have two elements, it's obvious
We identified the problem on the german mailinglist:
http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?id=9586
Matthias
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Andrew Errington <
a.erring...@lancaster.ac.uk> wrote:
> > I thought that setting bridge=yes or tunnel=yes didn't imply anything
> > about the layer. The wiki says, "it is better to explicitly state the
> > layer". It definitely appears that the renderers don't g
Am 12. Oktober 2010 13:20 schrieb Matthias Meißer :
> I guess it is just an mistake and the situation is a little bit heated up by
> some undocumented adds during the past months.
+1
> There is no further doc needed beside a backlink to the vote (my suggestion)
usually a feature page is creat
It hasn't been changed for a while, I'm moving it to voting period (in case we
have paragliders out there, but any one is welcome to find bugs and/or things
we forgot )
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/free_flying
--
sly
Sylvain Letuffe li...@letuffe.org
qui suis-je : htt
2010/10/12 Dave F. :
> On 11/10/2010 21:30, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
>>
>> wiki editing is not easy. if the instructions also come in a language
>> which isn't your own it gets even harder
>
> I agree
>
> For instance, in the discussion pages how do you add your username along
> with a time stamp?
Like this?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Help:Wiki_markup#Signing_comments
2010/10/12 Dave F.
> On 11/10/2010 21:30, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
>
>>
>> wiki editing is not easy. if the instructions also come in a language
>> which isn't your own it gets even harder
>>
> I agree
>
> For instance, i
2010/10/12 Dave F. :
> On 11/10/2010 21:30, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
>>
>> wiki editing is not easy. if the instructions also come in a language
>> which isn't your own it gets even harder
>
> I agree
>
> For instance, in the discussion pages how do you add your username along
> with a time stamp?
On 11/10/2010 21:30, ed...@billiau.net wrote:
wiki editing is not easy. if the instructions also come in a language
which isn't your own it gets even harder
I agree
For instance, in the discussion pages how do you add your username along
with a time stamp?
Could someone recommend a wiki ed
Am 12.10.2010 13:20, schrieb Matthias Meißer:
I guess Jonobennett just couldn't find the backlink to your sucessful
vote and tried to keep the Map features page clean. Did you tried to
contact him already?
No but I will do so. I'm not following the tagging list permanently so I
was not sure if I
Hi Peter,
I guess it is just an mistake and the situation is a little bit heated
up by some undocumented adds during the past months.
I guess Jonobennett just couldn't find the backlink to your sucessful
vote and tried to keep the Map features page clean. Did you tried to
contact him already
Hi friends of good tagging,
maybe I understood sth. wrong, but I'm sure you can clear the situation.
On 2010-09-23 the vote on the craft-proposal [1] finished with 35
approving and 0 opposing. After that I added the new tags to the
map-features page. On 2010-10-05 some one called Jonobennett r
27 matches
Mail list logo
