Re: [Tagging] tall masts supported by guy wires

2010-09-14 Thread Steve Bennett
On Mon, Sep 13, 2010 at 10:52 PM, Anthony wrote: > On Sun, Sep 12, 2010 at 9:26 PM, Steve Bennett wrote: >> One test to apply when considering stuff like this: what would happen >> if a renderer supported "man_made=tower" but none of the sub-tags. >> Would it be the end of the world if a radio ma

Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 September 2010 08:48, Richard Welty wrote: > so depot really sounds ok. So... highway=depot depot=bus|communication|road_works| ? ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread Richard Welty
On 9/14/10 6:41 PM, John Smith wrote: On 15 September 2010 08:39, Katie Filbert wrote: I would tag them as amenity=parking + access=private + operator=New York State Department of Transortation (or whatever applicable) + name=___ (fill blank) They aren't just used to park buses etc, they're a

Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 September 2010 08:39, Katie Filbert wrote: > I would tag them as amenity=parking + access=private + operator=New York > State Department of Transortation (or whatever applicable) + name=___ (fill > blank) They aren't just used to park buses etc, they're also fueling and maintenance location

Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread Katie Filbert
On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:34 PM, Richard Welty wrote: On 9/14/10 6:27 PM, John Smith wrote: On 15 September 2010 08:23, Richard Welty wrote: garages operated by school districts for their bus services Locally these more commonly referred to as a depot... nothing documented for that on t

Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread Katie Filbert
On Sep 14, 2010, at 6:23 PM, Richard Welty wrote: landuse=garage seems pretty tightly focused right now. I'm not familiar with the landuse=garage tag. what i'd like to tag that doesn't really fit are garages operated by various government entities, e.g. garages operated by school distric

Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread Richard Welty
On 9/14/10 6:27 PM, John Smith wrote: On 15 September 2010 08:23, Richard Welty wrote: garages operated by school districts for their bus services Locally these more commonly referred to as a depot... nothing documented for that on the map features wiki page either. what specifically is u

Re: [Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread John Smith
On 15 September 2010 08:23, Richard Welty wrote: > garages operated by school districts for their bus services Locally these more commonly referred to as a depot... ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listi

[Tagging] tagging government garages

2010-09-14 Thread Richard Welty
landuse=garage seems pretty tightly focused right now. what i'd like to tag that doesn't really fit are garages operated by various government entities, e.g. garages operated by school districts for their bus services garages operated by towns, counties, and state DOT organizations to suppor

Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] social facility

2010-09-14 Thread Sam Vekemans
Yup, i prefer the tagging-tree approach where more tags can be used to narrow down the specifics of what it is you are trying to map. For the end user who is using a Garmin GPS, there are only a specific set of key/value combinations, so i want to ensure that the key/value used in OSM can quickly

Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] social facility

2010-09-14 Thread Sean Horgan
Good feedback Peter and thanks for passing along the Crossing wiki. Some comments below: On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 10:39, Peter Wendorff wrote: > Hi. > > On 14.09.2010 18:59, Sean Horgan wrote: > > [...] > > Also, if I wanted to capture specific data about that they offered, I'd > like to follow

Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] social facility

2010-09-14 Thread Peter Wendorff
Hi. On 14.09.2010 18:59, Sean Horgan wrote: [...] Also, if I wanted to capture specific data about that they offered, I'd like to follow the amenity:recycling tagging scheme (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Tag:amenity%3Drecycling): + homeless_shelter:programs=jobs + homeless_shelter:mea

Re: [Tagging] tagging single trees

2010-09-14 Thread Dave F.
Hi I disagree with Nop for all the reasons discussed here. Is there someone with more knowledge than me, run a bot to reverse his changes? Cheers Dave F. ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/ta

Re: [Tagging] [OpenStreetMap] social facility

2010-09-14 Thread Sean Horgan
Thanks for the feedback Sam. kerosin and I have talked about a couple of different approaches: social_facility=shelter social_facility:for=homeless or along the lines as you recommended: social_facility=shelter shelter=homeless_shelter I find social_facility:for=homeless to be more descriptive

Re: [Tagging] tall masts supported by guy wires

2010-09-14 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
yes, it should be both (or could be also building=tower instead of yes). cheers, Martin ___ Tagging mailing list Tagging@openstreetmap.org http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging

Re: [Tagging] trees and waterways

2010-09-14 Thread Elizabeth Dodd
On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 09:49:54 +0200 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote: > > No, that's exactly the same as 'oneway=no' on two-ways roads. When > > the tag is not present, we assume that the road is two ways. That's > > it. If it's wrong, then fix it by adding the oneway tag. > > It is the same for waterway

Re: [Tagging] trees and waterways

2010-09-14 Thread M∡rtin Koppenhoefer
2010/9/13 Pieren : > No, that's exactly the same as 'oneway=no' on two-ways roads. When the tag > is not present, we assume that the road is two ways. That's it. If it's > wrong, then fix it by adding the oneway tag. > It is the same for waterways and the direction of the way. If it's wrong, > the

Re: [Tagging] Feature Proposal - Voting - Craft

2010-09-14 Thread Peter Körner
Am 07.09.2010 13:31, schrieb Peter Körner: after two weeks without contradictions, I'll open up voting for the Craft proposal: The Voting has now been open for 1 week and so far we have 25 people approving the proposal. The voting wi