On 2 June 2010 15:58, pavithran wrote:
> Oops missed that tag . yeah boutique would be appropriate ( missed the
> tag because in Indian english we rarely hear the word 'boutique' )
At a first glance it looks French origin...
> I think I better tag it as shop=beautyparlour but still would argue
>
On 2 June 2010 11:12, John Smith wrote:
> On 2 June 2010 15:36, pavithran wrote:
>> There are shops called 'Fancy shops' which sell fancy items like
>> ribbons,bangles,sticker other items used by girls .
>
> I think you are describing boutique shops, in which case I'd simply
> use shop=boutique ?
On 2 June 2010 14:42, Roy Wallace wrote:
> I'm not sure if I should start a new thread for this, but John:
> shouldn't the node's role be "tower", not "transponder"?
> i.e. the *relation* represents the transponder (hence
> type=transponder), but the *node* represents the *tower*, so should
> have
On 2 June 2010 15:36, pavithran wrote:
> There are shops called 'Fancy shops' which sell fancy items like
> ribbons,bangles,sticker other items used by girls .
I think you are describing boutique shops, in which case I'd simply
use shop=boutique ?
> It also needs a tag . Added to the above fancy
On 2 June 2010 14:37, Roy Wallace wrote:
> Is this a characteristic of the feature (that should be tagged), or of
> the residents (that shouldn't be tagged)?
I'd say both...
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.
On 2 June 2010 09:49, John Smith wrote:
> If the shop=hairdresser tag can't be extended enough to be suitable,
> use a new one, shop=beauty for example.
There are shops called 'Fancy shops' which sell fancy items like
ribbons,bangles,sticker other items used by girls .
It also needs a tag . Added
2010/6/1 John Smith :
> On 1 June 2010 19:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
>> why should we use a theory of spacial planning of the 1930ies that is
>> loosing importance, and that is (as far as I understand it) less
>
> I think he was making a point about others already trying to
> standardise citie
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 11:59 AM, John Smith wrote:
>
> I recently imported 2,152 locations, that have between them 7,633
> transmitters. Most of the towers had multiple transmitters so these
> were added using a relation linked to the tower node, eg this location
> has 17 transmitters:
>
> http://
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 12:21 PM, Stephen Hope wrote:
>
>> amenity=assisted_living + assisted_living=orphanage, OR
>> amenity=assisted_living + residents=children.
>
> Hmm - not all homes for children are for orphans. There is a home
> near me that is for children/youth with very heavy caring need
On 2 June 2010 13:53, pavithran wrote:
> Hi ,
> I am looking for an appropriate tag for a place where women/girls go
> to get some facial/hair/eyebrows done . They are called beauty
> parlours . I could find something for hair dressers .
If the shop=hairdresser tag can't be extended enough to be
Hi ,
I am looking for an appropriate tag for a place where women/girls go
to get some facial/hair/eyebrows done . They are called beauty
parlours . I could find something for hair dressers .
But here I am looking for
* Beauty fixes
* sex=male/female
*Type=normal/herbal
There are many such places i
On 2 June 2010 12:21, Stephen Hope wrote:
> Hmm - not all homes for children are for orphans. There is a home
> near me that is for children/youth with very heavy caring needs, that
> cannot be handled by their families. Some of the residents stay there
> all the time, some come for visits when
On 2 June 2010 11:48, Roy Wallace wrote:
>
> amenity=assisted_living, because (if?) in all cases you are describing
> a place where people *live* with *assistance*.
I like assisted_living as well. Be aware, though, that it is starting
to be used as a marketing term for those places which are not
2010/6/2 y...@o2.pl :
> Although voting should be ended last year ;) most of votes were added
> after vote end. So I think it's finally time to end the voting: I'll
> close it after weekend. If someone want to vote, please do it asap.
>
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Base_tr
On Wed, Jun 2, 2010 at 1:58 AM, y...@o2.pl wrote:
>
> We can
> continue discussion at 'residential_home' proposal
> (http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Residential_home).
> RFC is open since 2009 but there are still things we need to solve:
>
> * name: 'residential_home' or 'assi
On Friday 28 May 2010 13:14:30 sly (sylvain letuffe) wrote:
> First, I'm aware that full classification of every populated places is not
> possible world wide with one tag only, the proposition states that clearly.
> administrative, interest, tourism, local concerns need to be recorded with
> other
Although voting should be ended last year ;) most of votes were added
after vote end. So I think it's finally time to end the voting: I'll
close it after weekend. If someone want to vote, please do it asap.
http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Proposed_features/Base_transceiver_station
Regards,
Paw
2010/5/28 Roy Wallace :
> Right idea, but from my perspective landuse=* shouldn't be used to
> describe an individual feature (like an orphanage), but to describe
> the use of an area of land. If you want to do tiered tags like this
> you'd use something more like amenity=residential_home +
> resid
On 1 June 2010 19:41, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> why should we use a theory of spacial planning of the 1930ies that is
> loosing importance, and that is (as far as I understand it) less
I think he was making a point about others already trying to
standardise cities and how they weren't able to
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, M∡rtin Koppenhoefer wrote:
> Do you suggest to add specific tags for factory "components" like
> assembly lines, soldering facilities, bottling plants, ...? This will
> become very extensive for all kind of factories that exist, but why
> not?
>
Whatever is decided should be
2010/6/1 Liz :
> A large factory may consist of a number of smaller parts, some of which are
> workshops. Other areas may be assembly lines / bottling plants / first aid
> posts.
of course, it might also have its own fire department, police, shops,
restaurants, traffic enforcement, railway statio
2010/6/1 Martin Simon :
> 2010/6/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
>
>> If you can read German I also suggest this one, which is not
>> comparable to the English version:
>> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadt
>
> How about this approach?
> http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_place_theory
> German:
> http://
2010/6/1 M∡rtin Koppenhoefer :
> If you can read German I also suggest this one, which is not
> comparable to the English version:
> http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stadt
How about this approach?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Central_place_theory
German:
http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/System_der_Zentr
2010/5/28 sly (sylvain letuffe) :
> First, I'm aware that full classification of every populated places is not
> possible world wide with one tag only, ...The problem I see with actual place
> usage is that it is not
> standardazided world wide ...
IMHO place is a rough estimate where in the loc
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Roy Wallace wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Liz wrote:
> > Option 1
> > Industrial=factory/workshop
>
> I don't like this key. To me, that reads "this feature is an
> *industrial*, of type *factory*", or "the *industrial* of this feature
> is a *factory*". Maybe try t
On Tue, 1 Jun 2010, Pieren wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Liz wrote:
>
> Are you talking about a landuse area, a building polygon, a site relation ?
>
> Pieren
not landuse really because that wouldn't need a new Key, landuse=industrial
would be a simple thing
- a means to tag what i
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 5:58 PM, Liz wrote:
>
> Option 1
> Industrial=factory/workshop
I don't like this key. To me, that reads "this feature is an
*industrial*, of type *factory*", or "the *industrial* of this feature
is a *factory*". Maybe try to fill in the blank: a factory is a kind
of ? I
(Multiple answers)
First, I'm aware that full classification of every populated places is not
possible world wide with one tag only, the proposition states that clearly.
administrative, interest, tourism, local concerns need to be recorded with
other tags. The problem I see with actual place usa
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 9:58 AM, Liz wrote:
Are you talking about a landuse area, a building polygon, a site relation ?
Pieren
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
On 1 June 2010 17:58, Liz wrote:
> Option 4
> open for suggestion here
I'd go for sub-typing and sub-tagging and use overly broad categories
and then break it down from there, eg:
factory=commercial/industrial/workshop/*
produces=electrical/electronic/furniture/*
___
I photograph and then tag as many things as possible when out mapping.
Today I was looking at a "light industrial area"
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light_industry
and there are no suitable tags for factories and workshops
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Factory
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Workshop
31 matches
Mail list logo
