On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 10:38 PM, Anthony wrote:
>
> It's relatively recent in US law, but relatively standard elsewhere. The
> reason it's in US law is because it is required by the Berne Convention
but we did it wrong ... we outlawed public domain by not creating
opt-out when we rejected Opt-i
On 16 May 2010 13:05, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Anyway, fwiw, I completely disregard the "reasonable size" rule. It
> sort of makes sense for nodes (ie, don't make an "amenity=parking"
> node to represent only 6 spots), but not really for areas (the end
> user will clearly see that it's a tiny car pa
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 3:18 AM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> Says that amenity=parking should only be used for parking lots, and
> not other less formal parking.
Specifically "A parking lot is an area reserved for parking cars,
trucks, motorcycles etc. Parking spaces along streets are currently
not
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 3:40 PM, Bill Ricker wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> > AFAIK everything that is written down is copyright.
>
> that is a peculiarity of (relatively) recent 'reforms' in the US Code
> (which made registration and even proper marking optional),
On Sun, May 16, 2010 at 7:39 AM, antony.king
wrote:
> I've added a new wiki category Category:MicroMapping if anyone cares to use
> it.
I suggest you add lots of pages to that category yourself, if you want
it to get any uptake.
Steve
___
Tagging mai
re sensory=? to smell?
Perhaps the word you want is Olfactory ?
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1...@gmail.com
___
Tagging mailing list
Tagging@openstreetmap.org
http://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
I've added a new wiki category Category:MicroMapping if anyone cares to use it.
I notice that the term micromapping is also used in the context of
micro mapping parties.
On 15 May 2010 16:23, Steve Bennett wrote:
> Is there really a difference? There's just one continuum all the way
> from conti
On 16 May 2010 05:27, Jonas Minnberg wrote:
> The time these come in handy is when they show the streets in a residential
> area that don't otherwise have clear streetnames - usually when there are
> lots of small ways in between the buildings. Then it's practically the only
> way to know which ro
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:54 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> AFAIK everything that is written down is copyright.
that is a peculiarity of (relatively) recent 'reforms' in the US Code
(which made registration and even proper marking optional), it is not
universal.
IANAL
--
Bill
n1...@arrl.net bill.n1..
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 8:54 PM, Chris Hill wrote:
> Jonas Minnberg wrote:
> > Is it OK to use information you find on map-signs next to streets or
> > suburban areas?
> >
> > Usually they show the houses and street names in a certain area
> > (residential or commercial most often).
> > None I ha
2010/5/15 Jonas Minnberg :
> Is it OK to use information you find on map-signs next to streets or
> suburban areas?
I think it depends. IMO you should check FOP in your country
(http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Freedom_of_panorama).
2010/5/15 Chris Hill :
> Why not walk / cycle / drive a
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:58 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Claudius Henrichs
> wrote:
> > Am 15.05.2010 19:18, Serge Wroclawski:
>
> > So you should rather go for getting the access tagging correctly by on
> > the ground surveying.
>
> I collect plenty of data fo
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:46 PM, Claudius Henrichs wrote:
> Am 15.05.2010 19:18, Serge Wroclawski:
>> 2) We fix the definition of parking and change the renderer.
>>
> Redefining an established tag won't work. How will you ensure that the
> remaining... hundreds of thousands of occurances of ameni
Jonas Minnberg wrote:
> Is it OK to use information you find on map-signs next to streets or
> suburban areas?
>
> Usually they show the houses and street names in a certain area
> (residential or commercial most often).
> None I have found have ever had any sort of copyright text on them.
AFAIK
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:44 PM, Katie Filbert wrote:
> Regarding rendering, two weeks ago, a change was made to the Mapnik
> rendering:
Yeah, I forgot to mention that, since the changeset I applied last
night was assuming the old rules.
- Serge
___
Am 15.05.2010 19:18, Serge Wroclawski:
> 2) We fix the definition of parking and change the renderer.
>
Redefining an established tag won't work. How will you ensure that the
remaining... hundreds of thousands of occurances of amenity=parking
comply to your new definition?
So you should rath
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 1:18 PM, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
>
> This appeared to be caused by the lack of access tags, since the
> renderer assumes that in absence of an access tag, it renders as if
> access=public were set.
>
> The polygons we received were of all sorts of parking- lots, side
> par
2010/5/15 Jonas Minnberg :
> Is it OK to use information you find on map-signs next to streets or
> suburban areas?
> Usually they show the houses and street names in a certain area (residential
> or commercial most often).
> None I have found have ever had any sort of copyright text on them.
If
Is it OK to use information you find on map-signs next to streets or
suburban areas?
Usually they show the houses and street names in a certain area (residential
or commercial most often).
None I have found have ever had any sort of copyright text on them.
-- Sasq
On 16 May 2010 03:18, Serge Wroclawski wrote:
> 2) We fix the definition of parking and change the renderer.
>
> #2 is my favorite solution, as it seems the most "right". #3 is my
> least favorite solution, since it's all high quality data.
A slight twist on #2, you add sub-tags.
amenity=parking
What I'm about to post here is (for the most part) replicated in a
Trac ticket to the Rendering folks at:
http://trac.openstreetmap.org/ticket/2968
but I think this will probably require a change to the tagging of
amenity=parking, so I'm sending it here as well.
In Washington, DC, we've received p
Is there really a difference? There's just one continuum all the way
from continents down to water taps. More categories (assuming you mean
wiki categories) would probably help organise stuff though...
Steve
On Sat, May 15, 2010 at 2:37 AM, antony.king
wrote:
> While preparing the proposed playg
On Sat, 15 May 2010, Petr Morávek [Xificurk] wrote:
> and the last,
> most puzzling is landuse=basin "An area of water that drains into a
> river."...
>
wow, there are some pretty huge ones of those
like the Amazon basin
the Lake Eyre basin
the Mississipi basin
the fill_in_any_large_river basin
s
M∡rtin Koppenhoefer napsal(a):
> On the other hand: I would like to see this mess tidyed up. In this
> case I suggest to first change (extend) render rules and then
> encourage people to change tagging. This is all because of tagging for
> the renderers: because it is sad to tag "correct" and you d
On Fri, May 14, 2010 at 2:21 PM, John Smith wrote:
> You missed the important point I made, which was the bit about these
Stop reminding me how much I dislike trying to discuss anything with
you. We're in agreement. Nuff said.
Steve
___
Tagging mailin
25 matches
Mail list logo
