Partial success.
I re-installed Solaris and did the image-update stage described by Greg.
Now a whole herd of packages with version 0.99 are available. gdb does
not drop core. GnomeSword builds and runs and I am fixing some
Solaris-specific bugs. Mostly these have to do with differences in
opin
Y'know, if this wasn't so deranged, it would be inspired.
In one last, desperate attempt to move to a point where I might be able
to continue progress (because when all is said and done, I really would
like GS to run on Solaris), I recalled words about version 0.98 of
stuff, and I had used the rel
"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't know the answer to your question -- I would guess that it's
> gdb, since it seems that gcc/g++ is the "standard" compiler toolchain
> for Solaris.
No, Sun was the first to go the "unbundled" route, in the early '90s,
which is why their filesyst
Karl,
> Sword was obtained by svn checkout at -r2174 (1.5.11 release; GS as
> released and as in svn is not yet compatible with genbook VerseKey). GS
> was obtained by svn checkout, latest rev.
I used the latest tarball available on Sourceforge. 2.4.0 I believe.
>
> It was necessary to use gma
All right, I've finally made progress.
I got frustrated enough that I re-installed Solaris because I got to a
point where ./configure stages were failing because gcc had stopped
being able to compile test programs, in turn because ld began
complaining of missing libc symbols. This was due to eith
On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> "Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > My guess is that the update to -0.98 came with the image-upgrade that I
> ran
> > from the command-line
>
> If you mean the directions for immediate update specified here...
Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Of course, as I mess around with this a bit more, I've just been pointed
> to pkgchk, whose man page provides the example "pkgchk -l -p /usr/bin/ls",
> for which it should "display package installation information"...and yet
> which produces empty outpu
"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My guess is that the update to -0.98 came with the image-upgrade that I ran
> from the command-line
If you mean the directions for immediate update specified here...
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/#Update_Inst
...I did that
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> "Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Package Manager does not list xrender.pc as part of the xorg-headers
> > package, nevertheless, after installing that package, I had the
> xrender.pc
> > file. What version
"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Package Manager does not list xrender.pc as part of the xorg-headers
> package, nevertheless, after installing that package, I had the xrender.pc
> file. What version were you trying? I have 0.5.11-0.98. I presume the
> 0.5.11 means that this is SunO
On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> "Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > I had to manually enter the address for pkg.opensolaris.org into the
> > /etc/hosts file, because the system could not figure out DNS until
> > after the update
>
> Edit /et
"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I had to manually enter the address for pkg.opensolaris.org into the
> /etc/hosts file, because the system could not figure out DNS until
> after the update
Edit /etc/nsswitch.conf to add "dns" to the "hosts" line instead.
> I then had to manually bui
Building on Solaris notes:
I installed openSolaris 2008.05, then updated to all the latest packages (I
had to manually enter the address for pkg.opensolaris.org into the
/etc/hosts file, because the system could not figure out DNS until after the
update). This was done by issuing the command pkg
List,
On a side note - I just downloaded and installed OpenSolaris 2008.05 (5.11
for those of you on the Sun versioning scheme) and it installs Gnome 2.20 by
default as its windowing system. It might have a more up-to-date version in
the default package manager, but I installed it into a VM, and
On Oct 5, 2008, at 7:00 PM, jonathon wrote:
>
>
>> As an aside to the original poster - why are you interested in non-
>> Java clients, when Java is the main thrust behind the Solaris
>> desktop?
>
> I've come to prefer the original Unix philosophy.
I'm curious as to what "the original Unix p
Karl,
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greg, there were approximately two dozen pieces of information in your
> message for which I have exactly zero context. Bear in mind that I have
> not used a Solaris machine in the better part of 15 years.
My ap
Greg, there were approximately two dozen pieces of information in your
message for which I have exactly zero context. Bear in mind that I have
not used a Solaris machine in the better part of 15 years.
For starters, I have no knowledge of how to configure Solaris' package
manager to use any other
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 21:16, Greg Hellings wrote:
> The pkg-get packages from CSW have gnome in them. Version 2.22 is in the
> repository. If you use the packages from sunfreeware.com, they have most of
I'll try that out, then.
> As an aside to the original poster - why are you interested i
Karl,
On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am experimenting with building GnomeSword for OpenSolaris. Sword
> itself is now built, no major shakes but there is neither CLucene nor
> (functional) ICU. Even so, fine so far.
I don't have OpenSolaris inst
I am experimenting with building GnomeSword for OpenSolaris. Sword
itself is now built, no major shakes but there is neither CLucene nor
(functional) ICU. Even so, fine so far.
What's got me stuck is that GnomeSword wants to verify presence of a
bunch of GNOME packages, in the dependency chain f
2008/10/5 jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> All:
>
> Has anybody done any work on creating a Sword Project front end that
> runs on OpenSolaris?
> Something that doesn't use JAVA.
I thought that both gnome and KDE run on OpenSolaris so gnomesword and
bibletime should both work?
Regards,
Daniel
___
: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:05:13 +1000
> Von: "Ben Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> An: "SWORD Developers\' Collaboration Forum"
> Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris
> BPBible might/should work - it needs:
> Python 2.5
> wxPython
BPBible might/should work - it needs:
Python 2.5
wxPython (not sure about packages for opensolaris, though)
Sword with python bindings
God Bless,
Ben
---
The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some cou
L.Allan-pbio wrote:
> Some observations (none major ... good work):
>
Thanks.
> * nit ... Crosswire license mentions copyright 1994-2005 ... should
> this be 2006? (the Help About for sword.exe itself has 2006)
>
Good catch.
> * SWORD_PATH environment variable over-written ... should per
I also don't understand why the InstallManager fields can't be
pre-filled with default, valid info. Why would this convenience cause
risks? I can understand if they proceed to get modules, but not why it
is a risk just the convenience of prefilling a rather obscure part of
The SWORD Project (if
Some observations (none major ... good work):
* nit ... Crosswire license mentions copyright 1994-2005 ... should
this be 2006? (the Help About for sword.exe itself has 2006)
* SWORD_PATH environment variable over-written ... should permission
be asked to do this if one already exists (makes in
I believe that I received this message erroneously.
Walter
On 9/29/06 5:30 PM, "Geoffrey W Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sorry to be so slow to respond.
> It wasn't a firewall problem. It was a typo. I had mistyped Crosswire in
> the ftp.crosswire.org Remote site manager.
> Now everyth
I believe that I received this message erroneously.
Walter
On 9/29/06 7:51 PM, "Geoffrey W Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Makes good sense.
> Thanks
>
>
> On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:07:21 -0400 DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> writes:
>
>>
>> Geoff,
>>
>> This is a great question. The re
I believe that I received this message erroneously.
Walter
On 9/29/06 6:07 PM, "DM Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Geoffrey W Hastings wrote:
>
>> Why not have Crosswire already installed as a remote site.
>> I would guess that the majority of windows users woul
Makes good sense.
Thanks
On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:07:21 -0400 DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>
> Geoff,
>
> This is a great question. The reason is stated in the disclaimer
> that
> pops up when the user first installs modules: Don't use the web to
>
> load the program if you are in
On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Geoffrey W Hastings wrote:
> Why not have Crosswire already installed as a remote site.
> I would guess that the majority of windows users would not be able to
> figure this out.
>
> [New Remote Site]
> ftp.domain.org
> /pub/sword/raw/
>
Geoff,
This is a great questi
Sorry to be so slow to respond.
It wasn't a firewall problem. It was a typo. I had mistyped Crosswire in
the ftp.crosswire.org Remote site manager.
Now everything works fine in XP pro.
It also works fine on Win NT 2000
This brings up a question.
Why not have Crosswire already installed as a remot
Works fine on windows XP.
However, the install manager doesn't have the usual sword ftp installed by
default (ie, no remote sources).
Is this an error or by design?
Kyle
At 15:06 9/23/2006, you wrote:
DM Smith has packaged up our latest binaries into installation packs.
It would be great if we
Greg,
Do you have firewall software that needs to give permission for a
new program? I had to do that with ZoneAlarm.
DM
On Sep 24, 2006, at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey W Hastings wrote:
> I should have stated in my message below that I did my install
> over the
> old 1.5.6 version.
> I tried
I should have stated in my message below that I did my install over the
old 1.5.6 version.
I tried using the install manager after the installation was complete and
I had already opened the program.
I did try it from the tools menu and also by going through Start,
Programs, The Sword Project, Inst
Troy,
I did a clean install of just the starter pack. I set up crosswire
as a remote site and installed a few modules. I tried both passive
and not. I tried the InstallManager both when it was offered during
install and also from the Tools menu from inside the program. In no
case, f
I tried the install manager under WinXP pro.
It returns the message: Can't connect please check your configuration.
I tried checking and unchecking the box for passive FTP transfer. I got
the same message both ways.
I had installed using the 1.5.9 SwordSetupStarterPack.exe.
It installed fine. Sta
Any feedback on the new InstallManager? Has anyone tried to add
crosswire as a remote site and install modules over the internet? I had
trouble with the progress page updating during install, but thought it
might be a fluke. Anyone try with success or failure?
-Troy.
Troy A. Griff
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> If you have downloaded or found any problems with the program,
> please try again.
Interesting. This latest download now correctly displays the
commentary I showed to Troy in Rev9:7 a few evenings ago, but the Good
Samaritan commentary I mentioned in my prev
Oops,
My mistake, I forgot to unzip my upload. If you have downloaded or
found any problems with the program, please try again.
On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> DM Smith has packaged up our latest binaries into installation packs.
> It would be great if we could g
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Software Only
> http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/biblecs/SwordSetup.exe
This installs fine.
However, there is still the RTF bug I showed you a couple of evenings
ago, regarding unpreserved `{'. You can see it yourself if you open
the standard AB
FWIW, it works in Wine.
On Saturday 23 September 2006 15:06, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> DM Smith has packaged up our latest binaries into installation packs.
> It would be great if we could get some reports on the installation
> process before we release to the general public.
>
> Software Only
Actually, we installed it on my girlfriends laptop and fired it up and it
worked, right out of the box. Navagation is a bit clunky but there are a lot
of programs like that...
Josh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of L.Allan-pbio
Sent: Thursd
On 15/02/06, Josh Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Greetings,
>
> After doing a bit of thinking and then not being able to locate the
> archives so I can search them too, I was wondering what the
> functionality was between The SWORD for Windows Front end and the JAWS
> for Windows screen reader.
Josh,
IIRC KDE offers a TTS api. You are welcome to integrate support for this into
BibleTime if you like.
mg
Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 07:47 schrieb Josh Gould:
> Greg,
>
> I had my girlfriend try the Windows front end, and much to our suprise
> it worked pretty much "Out of the Box." On
Greg,
I had my girlfriend try the Windows front end, and much to our suprise
it worked pretty much "Out of the Box." One thing that was kinda
cumbersome was the install manager, as most of the buttons are not set
to use the alt key to activate them, (Nor tabbing to them, and I'm
unsure how to fix
I've thought it would be great to integrate open source text to speech technology into sword front-ends for 2 purposes. 1) Those who are visually impared could listen to everything available in the Sword library. I know braile would probably be better for extensive study, but sound is good too. 2)
Chris,
Thanks for the swift response.
> The Sword Project for Windows load times vary with the number of modules
> you have installed. Unfortunately, it DOESN'T scale very well, and load
> times can get very bad if you have hundreds of modules installed (just as
> with other software). Luckily,
On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Adrian Frost wrote:
> Anyway, onto TSP for Windows. First off; I like it a lot. It is fast to load
> and doesn't eat system resources (the downfall of the last app I was using)
The Sword Project for Windows load times vary with the number of modules
you have installed. Unfort
hi all... :)
just out of curiosity, I was wondering if anyone had the latest version
of the source of Bible Reader for Palm, before it went closed source?
the latest GPL version I can find is on the crosswire site (v1.0
release 3), but I have the prc of v1.1 beta 4...
I'm either looking at
currently an encyphered module which could be made available to you or made
Which module?
The God's Word Translation.
Greetings,
Christian
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.web42.com/crenz/ - http://www.web42.com/
"(Jesus Christ) produced mainly three effects -- Hatred -- Terror --
Adoratio
> Rev. Michael Hackbardt, Executive Director, God's Word to the Nations
>
> Dear Michael,
>
> You wrote the following to Wesley Allen:
> > In regard to your question... please have the people at www.crosswire.org >
>contact me and we'd be pleased to discuss this important opportunity with > them
lesti Te Deprimant
Per stercus tauri ad gloriam
Ecce! Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur
- Original Message -
From: "David Trotz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:18 PM
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Proje
I don't think this will answer all of your questions, but...
Back some time ago I played around with creating commentary modules for
Bible Reader. How you do it is - with Diaspora check the PBR, select module
(Bible or commentary only - dictionaries won't work) to convert. The
following will be
t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 11:42
AMSubject: Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project for Palm OS?>
Hi there ...>> On 18 Jan 2003 at 18:03, Martin Gruner
wrote:> > But after Poetry Poon decided to close his sources and go
commercial,Chris> > Little mad
Hi there ...
On 18 Jan 2003 at 18:03, Martin Gruner wrote:
> But after Poetry Poon decided to close his sources and go commercial, Chris
> Little made a snapshot of all the files that were available (GPL, afaik) up
> to this point. They reside on some harddrive now and are waiting for
> somebo
Woohooo it's here! Finally! Good work everyone, I am very
pleased with this release!
David
- Original Message -
From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, September 28, 2002 1:14 AM
Subject
: )
-Dave Overcash
> The CrossWire Bible Society and The SWORD Project Development
> Team are excited to announce the immediate availability of the long
> awaited version 1.5.4.
>
>New is this release:
>
>o User Interface Localization
>o Customizable
58 matches
Mail list logo
