> > GerElb1871 -- dunno
Came from OLB, user contributed.
As far as I know it's out of copyright and AFAIK the OLB guys did not enter
the text. The Elb 1905 module is out of copyright now, too.
I'll try to find some more infos on the net.
Joachim
--
Joachim Ansorg
www.bibletime.info
www.ansorgs.
> Kekchi
> Xhosa -- apparently from OLB; like it says, further info unknown
Kek'chi is the language of a people group of Maya descent that is still
in use today in the highlands of Guatemala, Central America. Being so,
the most probable translators would be Summer Institute of Linguistics
(I th
I was about ask you about that. :-) The Strongs files are from a file
produced by Michael Grier. They seem to be true to the PD printed version.
The contact info for Michael Grier no longer works.
Jerry
At 10:00 PM 1/5/2003 -0700, Chris Little wrote:
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> G
On Sun, 5 Jan 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> GreekHebrew
> HebrewGreek
Sorry... made a mistake in that last post. I somehow read
StrongsGreek/StrongsHebrew (which are from bf.org or a least linked to
from there).
These two modules came from their creator, with his permission. They're
also avai
> 2BabDict -- came through OLB, done by Gary Gallant, TOLBSS contributor
> ASV -- based on files from ebible.org & Michael Paul Johnson
> Barnes -- apparently came through OLB (we'll have to fix that since a
better the source is available) but not Larry's work
> Esperanto -- came through OLB,
> Where did Larry get his works?
Primarily from other people, with a few exceptions discussed in my
previous email (KJV+strongs, BDB/Thayer, TVM, various corruptions). When
noting copyright/requesting permissions in the past we go to the source,
not Larry. He has no control over the copyrig
Jonathan,
Jonathan Hughes wrote:
Hey Guys,
I think we need to be careful with how we react to this because we do
not want to go on the offense and start attacking Larry Pierce or the
Online Bible. That is not a Christ like response. We need to see what is
really bothering Larry and company and
Hey Guys,
I think we need to be careful with how we react to this because we do
not want to go on the offense and start attacking Larry Pierce or the
Online Bible. That is not a Christ like response. We need to see what is
really bothering Larry and company and see what we can do to allevi
Regarding the Indonesian texts, we have a friend at UBS that has put in
a good word for us at the Indonesian Bible Society, and we've contacted
them directly-- now that they know who we are and what we do-- and have
asked them to reconsider. We've offered to removed the modules if they
still w
On Sunday 05 January 2003 06:13 am, Patrick Durusau wrote:
> I don't think anyone who is familiar with the Sword project or you will
> take the accusations at the "Hall of Shame" seriously. The Sword project
> has to be mindful of copyright claims to avoid difficulties that would
> impend the proje
A search of my mods.d directory for "OLB" or "Pierce" or "online" leads me
to think the following materials may be based on online bible content
(mostly because they explicitly say they are):
2BabDict
ASV
Barnes
Esperanto
FreCrl
GerElb1871 (possibly?)
GreekHebrew
HebrewGreek
IGNT
ItaDio
ItaRive
Ke
Troy,
I don't think anyone who is familiar with the Sword project or you will
take the accusations at the "Hall of Shame" seriously. The Sword project
has to be mindful of copyright claims to avoid difficulties that would
impend the project. Having said that, I think your record in that regard
At 01:50 AM 1/5/2003 -0600, Mike & Amy Swanson wrote:
This really upsets me.
I sure understand that!
Before we all get too worked up about this, lets get the whole story. I
have in the past exchanged email with someone that had a copyright issue of
a different sort with the OLB people. He tal
I've been in recent dialog with Larry for about 2 months now. I've done
everything I know how-- recently and through the years-- to try to
please him, even honoring unfounded claims of copyright that he makes.
I'm not sure why he's been so rash in his correspondence lately.
The short of it is
At 02:51 AM 1/5/2003 -0500, David's Mailing List and Spam Receiver wrote:
I used to use the OLB back in my windows days, and I specifically remember
there being public domain notices on modules in their copyright info.
1)If OLB can use them because they're pd then other people can too I would
thi
This really upsets me. Can't the Online Bible people just be grateful
that the Word of God is getting out without stooping to a "hall of
shame?" I believe the shame rests on them in acting they way they are,
trying to discredit your work and ministry. If they are so worried
about you "steali
On Sunday 05 January 2003 01:40 am, Jerry Hastings wrote:
> Someone should ask them for a list of specific works that they belive are
> infringed, and exactly how they are infringed. Let me know if they try to
> pull the compilation copyright line.
I used to use the OLB back in my windows days, an
At 12:31 AM 1/5/2003 -0300, Christian Renz wrote:
I guess it would be good to react to this _quickly_. Do we still have
a large number of modules created out of OLB sources?
Someone should ask them for a list of specific works that they belive are
infringed, and exactly how they are infringed.
18 matches
Mail list logo
