[sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows

Is *The SWORD Project for Windows* ever going to be updated? Or should I move the link from our wiki main page to http://crosswire.org/wiki/Frontends:No_longer_actively_being_developed David -- View this message in con

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Partial success. I re-installed Solaris and did the image-update stage described by Greg. Now a whole herd of packages with version 0.99 are available. gdb does not drop core. GnomeSword builds and runs and I am fixing some Solaris-specific bugs. Mostly these have to do with differences in opin

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Y'know, if this wasn't so deranged, it would be inspired. In one last, desperate attempt to move to a point where I might be able to continue progress (because when all is said and done, I really would like GS to run on Solaris), I recalled words about version 0.98 of stuff, and I had used the rel

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I don't know the answer to your question -- I would guess that it's > gdb, since it seems that gcc/g++ is the "standard" compiler toolchain > for Solaris. No, Sun was the first to go the "unbundled" route, in the early '90s, which is why their filesyst

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Karl, > Sword was obtained by svn checkout at -r2174 (1.5.11 release; GS as > released and as in svn is not yet compatible with genbook VerseKey). GS > was obtained by svn checkout, latest rev. I used the latest tarball available on Sourceforge. 2.4.0 I believe. > > It was necessary to use gma

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

All right, I've finally made progress. I got frustrated enough that I re-installed Solaris because I got to a point where ./configure stages were failing because gcc had stopped being able to compile test programs, in turn because ld began complaining of missing libc symbols. This was due to eith

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

On Sat, Oct 11, 2008 at 9:38 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > "Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > My guess is that the update to -0.98 came with the image-upgrade that I > ran > > from the command-line > > If you mean the directions for immediate update specified here...

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Of course, as I mess around with this a bit more, I've just been pointed > to pkgchk, whose man page provides the example "pkgchk -l -p /usr/bin/ls", > for which it should "display package installation information"...and yet > which produces empty outpu

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > My guess is that the update to -0.98 came with the image-upgrade that I ran > from the command-line If you mean the directions for immediate update specified here... http://www.opensolaris.org/os/project/indiana/resources/rn3/#Update_Inst ...I did that

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 3:24 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > "Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Package Manager does not list xrender.pc as part of the xorg-headers > > package, nevertheless, after installing that package, I had the > xrender.pc > > file. What version

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Package Manager does not list xrender.pc as part of the xorg-headers > package, nevertheless, after installing that package, I had the xrender.pc > file. What version were you trying? I have 0.5.11-0.98. I presume the > 0.5.11 means that this is SunO

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 9:26 AM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote: > "Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > I had to manually enter the address for pkg.opensolaris.org into the > > /etc/hosts file, because the system could not figure out DNS until > > after the update > > Edit /et

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

"Greg Hellings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I had to manually enter the address for pkg.opensolaris.org into the > /etc/hosts file, because the system could not figure out DNS until > after the update Edit /etc/nsswitch.conf to add "dns" to the "hosts" line instead. > I then had to manually bui

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Building on Solaris notes: I installed openSolaris 2008.05, then updated to all the latest packages (I had to manually enter the address for pkg.opensolaris.org into the /etc/hosts file, because the system could not figure out DNS until after the update). This was done by issuing the command pkg

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

List, On a side note - I just downloaded and installed OpenSolaris 2008.05 (5.11 for those of you on the Sun versioning scheme) and it installs Gnome 2.20 by default as its windowing system. It might have a more up-to-date version in the default package manager, but I installed it into a VM, and

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

On Oct 5, 2008, at 7:00 PM, jonathon wrote: > > >> As an aside to the original poster - why are you interested in non- >> Java clients, when Java is the main thrust behind the Solaris >> desktop? > > I've come to prefer the original Unix philosophy. I'm curious as to what "the original Unix p

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Karl, On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 8:58 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greg, there were approximately two dozen pieces of information in your > message for which I have exactly zero context. Bear in mind that I have > not used a Solaris machine in the better part of 15 years. My ap

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Greg, there were approximately two dozen pieces of information in your message for which I have exactly zero context. Bear in mind that I have not used a Solaris machine in the better part of 15 years. For starters, I have no knowledge of how to configure Solaris' package manager to use any other

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 21:16, Greg Hellings wrote: > The pkg-get packages from CSW have gnome in them. Version 2.22 is in the > repository. If you use the packages from sunfreeware.com, they have most of I'll try that out, then. > As an aside to the original poster - why are you interested i

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

Karl, On Sun, Oct 5, 2008 at 2:00 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am experimenting with building GnomeSword for OpenSolaris. Sword > itself is now built, no major shakes but there is neither CLucene nor > (functional) ICU. Even so, fine so far. I don't have OpenSolaris inst

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

I am experimenting with building GnomeSword for OpenSolaris. Sword itself is now built, no major shakes but there is neither CLucene nor (functional) ICU. Even so, fine so far. What's got me stuck is that GnomeSword wants to verify presence of a bunch of GNOME packages, in the dependency chain f

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

2008/10/5 jonathon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > All: > > Has anybody done any work on creating a Sword Project front end that > runs on OpenSolaris? > Something that doesn't use JAVA. I thought that both gnome and KDE run on OpenSolaris so gnomesword and bibletime should both work? Regards, Daniel ___

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

: Sun, 5 Oct 2008 21:05:13 +1000 > Von: "Ben Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > An: "SWORD Developers\' Collaboration Forum" > Betreff: Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris > BPBible might/should work - it needs: > Python 2.5 > wxPython

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

BPBible might/should work - it needs: Python 2.5 wxPython (not sure about packages for opensolaris, though) Sword with python bindings God Bless, Ben --- The Lord is not slow to fulfill his promise as some cou

[sword-devel] The Sword Project on OpenSolaris

All: Has anybody done any work on creating a Sword Project front end that runs on OpenSolaris? Something that doesn't use JAVA. (I know it is supposed to be for servers, but it has some interesting possibilities for the computer user at home.) xan jonathon _

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Original Message - > From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: > Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:06 PM > Subject: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers > testing > > > >> DM Smith has packaged up our

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installerstesting

I also don't understand why the InstallManager fields can't be pre-filled with default, valid info. Why would this convenience cause risks? I can understand if they proceed to get modules, but not why it is a risk just the convenience of prefilling a rather obscure part of The SWORD Project (if

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

to God for His GREAT MERCY and LOVE - not an installer issue Registry cleanup: seems complete - Original Message - From: "Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 3:06 PM Subject: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

I believe that I received this message erroneously. Walter On 9/29/06 5:30 PM, "Geoffrey W Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Sorry to be so slow to respond. > It wasn't a firewall problem. It was a typo. I had mistyped Crosswire in > the ftp.crosswire.org Remote site manager. > Now everyth

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

I believe that I received this message erroneously. Walter On 9/29/06 7:51 PM, "Geoffrey W Hastings" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Makes good sense. > Thanks > > > On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:07:21 -0400 DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > writes: > >> >> Geoff, >> >> This is a great question. The re

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

I believe that I received this message erroneously. Walter On 9/29/06 6:07 PM, "DM Smith" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Geoffrey W Hastings wrote: > >> Why not have Crosswire already installed as a remote site. >> I would guess that the majority of windows users woul

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Makes good sense. Thanks On Fri, 29 Sep 2006 20:07:21 -0400 DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Geoff, > > This is a great question. The reason is stated in the disclaimer > that > pops up when the user first installs modules: Don't use the web to > > load the program if you are in

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

On Sep 29, 2006, at 7:30 PM, Geoffrey W Hastings wrote: > Why not have Crosswire already installed as a remote site. > I would guess that the majority of windows users would not be able to > figure this out. > > [New Remote Site] > ftp.domain.org > /pub/sword/raw/ > Geoff, This is a great questi

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Sorry to be so slow to respond. It wasn't a firewall problem. It was a typo. I had mistyped Crosswire in the ftp.crosswire.org Remote site manager. Now everything works fine in XP pro. It also works fine on Win NT 2000 This brings up a question. Why not have Crosswire already installed as a remot

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Works fine on windows XP. However, the install manager doesn't have the usual sword ftp installed by default (ie, no remote sources). Is this an error or by design? Kyle At 15:06 9/23/2006, you wrote: DM Smith has packaged up our latest binaries into installation packs. It would be great if we

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Greg, Do you have firewall software that needs to give permission for a new program? I had to do that with ZoneAlarm. DM On Sep 24, 2006, at 10:56 PM, Geoffrey W Hastings wrote: > I should have stated in my message below that I did my install > over the > old 1.5.6 version. > I tried

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

I should have stated in my message below that I did my install over the old 1.5.6 version. I tried using the install manager after the installation was complete and I had already opened the program. I did try it from the tools menu and also by going through Start, Programs, The Sword Project, Inst

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Troy, I did a clean install of just the starter pack. I set up crosswire as a remote site and installed a few modules. I tried both passive and not. I tried the InstallManager both when it was offered during install and also from the Tools menu from inside the program. In no case, f

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

I tried the install manager under WinXP pro. It returns the message: Can't connect please check your configuration. I tried checking and unchecking the box for passive FTP transfer. I got the same message both ways. I had installed using the 1.5.9 SwordSetupStarterPack.exe. It installed fine. Sta

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Any feedback on the new InstallManager? Has anyone tried to add crosswire as a remote site and install modules over the internet? I had trouble with the progress page updating during install, but thought it might be a fluke. Anyone try with success or failure? -Troy. Troy A. Griff

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > If you have downloaded or found any problems with the program, > please try again. Interesting. This latest download now correctly displays the commentary I showed to Troy in Rev9:7 a few evenings ago, but the Good Samaritan commentary I mentioned in my prev

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

Oops, My mistake, I forgot to unzip my upload. If you have downloaded or found any problems with the program, please try again. On Sep 23, 2006, at 5:06 PM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > DM Smith has packaged up our latest binaries into installation packs. > It would be great if we could g

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Software Only > http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/biblecs/SwordSetup.exe This installs fine. However, there is still the RTF bug I showed you a couple of evenings ago, regarding unpreserved `{'. You can see it yourself if you open the standard AB

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

FWIW, it works in Wine. On Saturday 23 September 2006 15:06, Troy A. Griffitts wrote: > DM Smith has packaged up our latest binaries into installation packs. > It would be great if we could get some reports on the installation > process before we release to the general public. > > Software Only

[sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.9 installers testing

DM Smith has packaged up our latest binaries into installation packs. It would be great if we could get some reports on the installation process before we release to the general public. Software Only http://www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/biblecs/SwordSetup.exe Starter Pack (Software + KJV, Strongs,

RE: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually

: Thursday, February 23, 2006 2:14 AM To: sword-devel@crosswire.org Subject: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually Josh, I am pretty ignorant about accessability issues, but I wanted to check if you got your question(s) answered ok. The reason for my reply is that I

[sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually

Josh, I am pretty ignorant about accessability issues, but I wanted to check if you got your question(s) answered ok. The reason for my reply is that I participate on the open source GPL Audacity audio editor project. Over the past month or so, there have been a significant number of threads

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually impaired

On 15/02/06, Josh Gould <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Greetings, > > After doing a bit of thinking and then not being able to locate the > archives so I can search them too, I was wondering what the > functionality was between The SWORD for Windows Front end and the JAWS > for Windows screen reader.

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually impaired

Josh, IIRC KDE offers a TTS api. You are welcome to integrate support for this into BibleTime if you like. mg Am Donnerstag, 16. Februar 2006 07:47 schrieb Josh Gould: > Greg, > > I had my girlfriend try the Windows front end, and much to our suprise > it worked pretty much "Out of the Box." On

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually impaired

Greg, I had my girlfriend try the Windows front end, and much to our suprise it worked pretty much "Out of the Box." One thing that was kinda cumbersome was the install manager, as most of the buttons are not set to use the alt key to activate them, (Nor tabbing to them, and I'm unsure how to fix

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually impaired

I've thought it would be great to integrate open source text to speech technology into sword front-ends for 2 purposes. 1) Those who are visually impared could listen to everything available in the Sword library. I know braile would probably be better for extensive study, but sound is good too. 2)

[sword-devel] The SWORD Project and ScreenReaders for the Visually impaired

Greetings, After doing a bit of thinking and then not being able to locate the archives so I can search them too, I was wondering what the functionality was between The SWORD for Windows Front end and the JAWS for Windows screen reader. My primary reason for asking is that I've never seen any bibl

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.6 - bugs and comments

Chris, Thanks for the swift response. > The Sword Project for Windows load times vary with the number of modules > you have installed. Unfortunately, it DOESN'T scale very well, and load > times can get very bad if you have hundreds of modules installed (just as > with other software). Luckily,

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.6 - bugs and comments

On Mon, 5 Jan 2004, Adrian Frost wrote: > Anyway, onto TSP for Windows. First off; I like it a lot. It is fast to load > and doesn't eat system resources (the downfall of the last app I was using) The Sword Project for Windows load times vary with the number of modules you have installed. Unfort

[sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.6 - bugs and comments

Hello, I've been using The SWORD Project for Windows for about a week now after switching from another bible software app. I'm hoping that as a user I'll be of some use in finding bugs and commenting on stuff - it's about all I'll be able to contribute as I have no programming skills (although I'v

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project for Palm OS?

hi all... :) just out of curiosity, I was wondering if anyone had the latest version of the source of Bible Reader for Palm, before it went closed source? the latest GPL version I can find is on the crosswire site (v1.0 release 3), but I have the prc of v1.1 beta 4... I'm either looking at

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project

currently an encyphered module which could be made available to you or made Which module? The God's Word Translation. Greetings, Christian -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.web42.com/crenz/ - http://www.web42.com/ "(Jesus Christ) produced mainly three effects -- Hatred -- Terror -- Adoratio

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project

> Rev. Michael Hackbardt, Executive Director, God's Word to the Nations > > Dear Michael, > > You wrote the following to Wesley Allen: > > In regard to your question... please have the people at www.crosswire.org > >contact me and we'd be pleased to discuss this important opportunity with > them

[sword-devel] The Sword Project

Rev. Michael Hackbardt, Executive Director, God's Word to the Nations Dear Michael, You wrote the following to Wesley Allen: > In regard to your question... please have the people at www.crosswire.org > contact >me and we'd be pleased to discuss this important opportunity with > them... with our

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project for Palm OS?

lesti Te Deprimant Per stercus tauri ad gloriam Ecce! Quid quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur - Original Message - From: "David Trotz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 11:18 PM Subject: Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Proje

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project for Palm OS?

I don't think this will answer all of your questions, but... Back some time ago I played around with creating commentary modules for Bible Reader. How you do it is - with Diaspora check the PBR, select module (Bible or commentary only - dictionaries won't work) to convert. The following will be

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project for Palm OS?

t;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>Sent: Saturday, January 18, 2003 11:42 AMSubject: Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project for Palm OS?> Hi there ...>> On 18 Jan 2003 at 18:03, Martin Gruner wrote:> > But after Poetry Poon decided to close his sources and go commercial,Chris> > Little mad

Re: [sword-devel] The Sword Project for Palm OS?

Hi there ... On 18 Jan 2003 at 18:03, Martin Gruner wrote: > But after Poetry Poon decided to close his sources and go commercial, Chris > Little made a snapshot of all the files that were available (GPL, afaik) up > to this point. They reside on some harddrive now and are waiting for > somebo

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.4

t: Saturday, September 28, 2002 1:14 AM Subject: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.4 > The CrossWire Bible Society and The SWORD Project Development > Team are excited to announce the immediate availability of the long > awaited version 1.5.4. > >New is this

Re: [sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.4

: ) -Dave Overcash > The CrossWire Bible Society and The SWORD Project Development > Team are excited to announce the immediate availability of the long > awaited version 1.5.4. > >New is this release: > >o User Interface Localization >o Customizable

[sword-devel] The SWORD Project for Windows 1.5.4

The CrossWire Bible Society and The SWORD Project Development Team are excited to announce the immediate availability of the long awaited version 1.5.4. New is this release: o User Interface Localization o Customizable Color/Font Scheme Selection