On Jan 2, 2009, at 10:56 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
DM Smith wrote:
I agree with Troy that the http://www.crosswire.org is our first
impression and needs to be a great one. I think that much of what you
have done has moved that direction.
I think that our audience is multi-faceted:
(IMHO)
-
DM Smith wrote:
> I agree with Troy that the http://www.crosswire.org is our first
> impression and needs to be a great one. I think that much of what you
> have done has moved that direction.
>
> I think that our audience is multi-faceted:
> (IMHO)
> - Our biggest target audience is the front-en
On Dec 31, 2008, at 11:31 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Sorry this section got lost in my last email.
I am thinking after some discussion with Troy last night we would
benefit from having a shorter list of presentable portfolio of stuff
we
do. At the moment the closest we have to this is
www.
David Haslam wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Speaking from my own experience, I have found that offering to provide a
> mobile phone application using Go Bible, and offering this as an
> unconditional free service, this can be the expression of good faith that
> can lead to greater co-operation from copyright
Peter,
Speaking from my own experience, I have found that offering to provide a
mobile phone application using Go Bible, and offering this as an
unconditional free service, this can be the expression of good faith that
can lead to greater co-operation from copyright owners (i.e. for CrossWire
in
Sorry this section got lost in my last email.
I am thinking after some discussion with Troy last night we would
benefit from having a shorter list of presentable portfolio of stuff we
do. At the moment the closest we have to this is
www.crosswire.org/applications.jsp
The difficulty is that a lot
