Jason,
I got to the end :)
I've added a poor link from the main page. I didn't know what category
you wanted it to be under. You are welcome to get me a blurb, thumbnail
(same size as the others on the front page), better URL, and suggest a
better category, and I'll be happy to update
ject: wxsword: was: Re: [sword-devel] New Windows SWORD GUI
> I have been thinking a lot about BibleStudy (aka wxSword) since sending my
> message to the list last night, and I have come to some conclusions.
> Hopefully they will work out for the best for everyone who has been, is
and
> hop
I have been thinking a lot about BibleStudy (aka wxSword) since sending my
message to the list last night, and I have come to some conclusions.
Hopefully they will work out for the best for everyone who has been, is and
hopes to be involved.
I have been out of the sword loop for a little while,
On Friday 19 December 2003 06:50 am, Simon Lagendijk wrote:
> >There are just a few people on the project, myself, Dan Glassey and David
> >Trotz, but there has not been any development since I got un-unemployed
> > (July '03). Since the project is GPL feel free to take the source and run
> > with
Title: [sword-devel] New Windows SWORD GUI
Hi Simon,
I'd be interested in participating in your project,
and perhaps putting in my 2 alt-155 worth at least during the planning stages. I
think there might be very positive coordination opportunities between LcdBible,
Ber
There are just a few people on the project, myself, Dan Glassey and David
Trotz, but there has not been any development since I got un-unemployed (July
'03). Since the project is GPL feel free to take the source and run with it.
I have been considering starting up on it again, so I'm going t
There are just a few people on the project, myself, Dan Glassey and David
Trotz, but there has not been any development since I got un-unemployed (July
'03). Since the project is GPL feel free to take the source and run with it.
I have been considering starting up on it again, so I'm going to re
Same bug I got. When I put the files in the Sword directory (same as the
sword.exe), it runs OK...
Simon
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Jason,
Went to try your windows binary and I get a memory protection
fault: Failed to read address 0x.
I'm on a fairly clean install of win2000. No cy
Jason,
Went to try your windows binary and I get a memory protection fault:
Failed to read address 0x.
I'm on a fairly clean install of win2000. No cygwin or anything else.
Do I need these? I think it finds the sword modules because the form
comes up and I see a tree on the left-- or
Hi Jason,
I just downloaded it, and it looked quite nice. Is there still any
development on wxWindows? If so, who are working on it, so I can ask
them if I can join them; if nobody's working on it, can I continue
development of it?
Simon
Jason Turner wrote:
I just thought I should mention my
I just thought I should mention my BibleStudy (a.k.a. wxSword) that is hosted
at www.sf.net/projects/christiangame the development is a little stale, but
it is a fully functioning wx based alternative to the current windows ui.
-Jason Turner
On Friday 12 December 2003 06:45 am, Lynn Allan wrote
> You can check out the docs from your account on crosswire and link to
> them from wiki, right?
Yeah. Willdo.
mg
___
sword-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
How about here:
http://www.crosswire.org/sword/apiref/index.html
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Martin,
I can link to them from the website. I have no problem with that at
all.
BUT, I remember myself not being able to understand the class
diagrams and comments produced by doxygen. I realize
Martin,
I can link to them from the website. I have no problem with that at all.
BUT, I remember myself not being able to understand the class diagrams
and comments produced by doxygen. I realize this is probably my fault
for not commenting the code better, but I would like a human mad
Thanks! I think it would really be nice to have them on the website.
Class Diagrams make it much easier to understand code..
Simon
Martin Gruner wrote:
Simon,
I maintain the API-docs for Sword, and they do contain a few class diagrams
and such. Please checkout the sword-apidoc module from cvs
Simon,
I maintain the API-docs for Sword, and they do contain a few class diagrams
and such. Please checkout the sword-apidoc module from cvs.
Troy, can we have this on the website somewhere?
Martin
Am Samstag, 13. Dezember 2003 02:06 schrieb Simon Lagendijk:
> Troy,
>
> > I'm really encou
Simon,
(adding to what Troy just replied...)
I'm really encouraged by your enthusiasm, but would really like
for you to cooperate in development with us. I'm not sure if you know
this or not, but your diagram could have names changes and be the
SWORD engine.
I wasn't aware of that. I se
Simon, Apologies for less than I'd like detail. I'm trying to finish a
procrastinator's schedule for the end of the semester on Monday.
Simon Lagendijk wrote:
I wasn't aware of that. I searched the crosswire website for some
diagrams, but couldn't find one. But if the Sword Engine does alread
Troy,
I'm really encouraged by your enthusiasm, but would really like
for you to cooperate in development with us. I'm not sure if you know
this or not, but your diagram could have names changes and be the
SWORD engine.
I wasn't aware of that. I searched the crosswire website for some
dia
Simon,
I'm really encouraged by your enthusiasm, but would really like for you
to cooperate in development with us. I'm not sure if you know this or
not, but your diagram could have names changes and be the SWORD engine.
We have backend 'drivers' that read different file formats, a library
o
Simon,
I believe you earlier asked about cross-development compiler tools for
Windows development?
If I understand your question (and if it was you that asked), there are
several alternatives that I am aware of.
1. Al Stevens donated "Quincy" for free usage. It is a relatively simple ide
that ut
At 04:25 PM 12/9/2003, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> * Does the author of some code has the right to use the same
> (self-written) code in both a GPL and a commercial project?
Yes and no. I suggest you dig for some answers on lists more knowledgeable
on this subject as this is a rather complicated ma
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Simon Lagendijk wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> >The GPL doesn't cover just distribution rights, it also covers usage.
> >USING Sword in an unauthorized manner, according to the license (by
> >linking to it, either at compile time or run time) would violate the
> >license.
> >
>
On Wed, Dec 10, 2003 at 12:17:34AM +0100, Simon Lagendijk wrote:
> * Is it possible to release parts of the code that are independant from
> GPL code, but are in a program that makes use of GPL code, under LGPL?
> The reason I ask is because I want to release some parts of the bible
> tool I'm w
On Wed, 10 Dec 2003, Simon Lagendijk wrote:
> >The GPL doesn't cover just distribution rights, it also covers usage.
> >USING Sword in an unauthorized manner, according to the license (by
> >linking to it, either at compile time or run time) would violate the
> >license.
>
> Some questions ab
Hi Chris,
The GPL doesn't cover just distribution rights, it also covers usage.
USING Sword in an unauthorized manner, according to the license (by
linking to it, either at compile time or run time) would violate the
license.
Some questions about this:
* Is it possible to release parts of t
>
> One of the features for our new bible software is the possibility to
> execute a command from the command prompt of Linux or Windows, like for
> example "Bible.exe -p Mat.1" prints Matthew 1 on the screen (just plain
> text output on the screen, which can be scrolled in by piping the output
Hi
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Hugo van der Kooij wrote:
> On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Chris Little wrote:
>
> > Also, ANY use of Sword Project code within other programs requires that
> > those programs be licensed under the GPL. That includes programs that
> > just interface Sword through a DLL.
>
> I was und
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Chris Little wrote:
> Also, ANY use of Sword Project code within other programs requires that
> those programs be licensed under the GPL. That includes programs that
> just interface Sword through a DLL.
I was under the impression that LGPL was design to tackle the GPL stic
Hi Simon,
On Mon, 8 Dec 2003, Simon Lagendijk wrote:
> >If you're thinking of using Sword itself (statically or dynamically
> >linked) or intend to support Sword modules by re-implementing our drivers,
> >using our code as a spec, (which I would strongly recommend against
> >attempting), I sup
Hello
Am Montag, 8. Dezember 2003 00:37 schrieb Simon Lagendijk:
> order to get your degree). After getting my Bachelors it isn't a problem
> to release all the code under GPL or LGPL, but for now I need a licence
> that keeps the main copyright of some code made by me on my name.
Even if you re
Hi Chris,
You might consider teaming up with the group who are already working on a
wxWindows interface to Sword. I'm not sure what their current status is,
but they have working code. You can grab their existing code (as well as
their Win32 binary) from http://sourceforge.net/projects/christ
You might consider teaming up with the group who are already working on a
wxWindows interface to Sword. I'm not sure what their current status is,
but they have working code. You can grab their existing code (as well as
their Win32 binary) from http://sourceforge.net/projects/christiangame.
Hi all,
A friend an I have the idea of making a new Bible tool, mainly aimed at
Windows users, because for Linux there are 2 nice Sword-based tools
available. We want to the program to run on at least Windows and Linux.
The code will be released under the GNU licence (or another OpenSource
lic
34 matches
Mail list logo
