Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-14 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Am 13.05.2008 um 19:11 schrieb DM Smith: > Manfred Bergmann wrote: >> Hi. >> >> MacSword uses the following schema for URLs: >> >> sword://[/> KeyRange> >> >> This is how I found it. >> I'm open to implement a standard if this has been besided. >> > I have a question about the @ sign. If you book

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Jonathan Morgan
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 10:24 AM, Ben Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If you have a link like sword://KJV/Mark.2.10,14 it will give you a > > > > > verse list in BibleCS (and you can then click on the individual verses). > > > (For some reason, sword://KJV/Mark.2.10,Mark.2.14 does the sam

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Just a quick note on this thread... SWORD has a URL utility: http://crosswire.org/svn/sword/trunk/include/url.h (notice the last couple public static methods) This class was originally written so we all could share URL syntax between render formats (i.e., basically, between frontends). I believ

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread DM Smith
On May 13, 2008, at 8:14 PM, Chris Little wrote: > DM Smith wrote: >> Chris Little wrote: >>> I think simply >>> >>> sword://Josephus/The War of the Jews/Book 1/Chapter 2/Section 3 >>> >>> should work, or >>> >>> sword://Josephus/The%20War%20of%20the%20Jews/Book%201/Chapter%202/Section%203 >>> >>

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Chris Little
Manfred Bergmann wrote: > MacSword uses the following schema for URLs: > > sword://[/ > > This is how I found it. > I'm open to implement a standard if this has been besided. What would you think of putting filter options in the query segment of the URI? An URI is broken up roughly like this

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Ben Morgan
Hi. > > If you have a link like sword://KJV/Mark.2.10,14 it will give you a > > verse list in BibleCS (and you can then click on the individual verses). > > (For some reason, sword://KJV/Mark.2.10,Mark.2.14 does the same, but > > takes the verses to be Mark 2:10 and 2:2, which is probably a bug

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Chris Little
DM Smith wrote: > Chris Little wrote: >> I think simply >> >> sword://Josephus/The War of the Jews/Book 1/Chapter 2/Section 3 >> >> should work, or >> >> sword://Josephus/The%20War%20of%20the%20Jews/Book%201/Chapter%202/Section%203 >> >> encoded as an URL. >> > This does not answer the osisID qu

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread DM Smith
On May 13, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Chris Little wrote: arl Kleinpaste wrote: (As it happens, GnomeSword understands sword:// and bible:// equivalently, but I suspect we should do away with the latter.) I had thought that BibleCS handled bible:// too, but when I checked earlier, it didn't. I'm ope

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread DM Smith
On May 13, 2008, at 7:35 PM, Chris Little wrote: > Karl Kleinpaste wrote: >> (As it happens, GnomeSword understands sword:// and bible:// >> equivalently, but I suspect we should do away with the latter.) > > I had thought that BibleCS handled bible:// too, but when I checked > earlier, it didn't

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Chris Little
Karl Kleinpaste wrote: > (As it happens, GnomeSword understands sword:// and bible:// > equivalently, but I suspect we should do away with the latter.) I had thought that BibleCS handled bible:// too, but when I checked earlier, it didn't. I'm open to adding bible://. It's certainly an easy addi

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread DM Smith
Chris Little wrote: > The original private protocol syntax for Sword (which is what is > implemented in BibleCS) is: > > sword://{module}/{key(list)} > > Our test page is: http://www.crosswire.org/~chrislit/testlinks.html > Cool! > BibleCS configures the private protocol handler in Windows whe

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Karl Kleinpaste
Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The original private protocol syntax for Sword (which is what is > implemented in BibleCS) is: > sword://{module}/{key(list)} This is the syntax that GnomeSword eats. GS asks to deploy itself in GNOME's GConf system, if it finds that there is no sword:/

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Chris Little
The original private protocol syntax for Sword (which is what is implemented in BibleCS) is: sword://{module}/{key(list)} Our test page is: http://www.crosswire.org/~chrislit/testlinks.html BibleCS configures the private protocol handler in Windows when it loads. There's also a Libronix-style

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Brian Fernandes
> MacSword uses the following schema for URLs: > > sword://[/ Manfred, I'm not familiar with MacSword, do you think you post a couple of examples with some complex URLs, perhaps those which make use of all the parts above? > I have a question about the @ sign. If you bookmark the URL with one

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread DM Smith
Manfred Bergmann wrote: > Hi. > > MacSword uses the following schema for URLs: > > sword://[/ > > This is how I found it. > I'm open to implement a standard if this has been besided. > I have a question about the @ sign. If you bookmark the URL with one in it, does Safari retain the full url or

Re: [sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread Manfred Bergmann
Hi. MacSword uses the following schema for URLs: sword://[/ This is how I found it. I'm open to implement a standard if this has been besided. Manfred Am 13.05.2008 um 17:46 schrieb DM Smith: > We've got a discussion going on jsword-devel regarding how to > represent > custom URLs for sw

[sword-devel] GenBook osisID and URIs

2008-05-13 Thread DM Smith
We've got a discussion going on jsword-devel regarding how to represent custom URLs for sword that will work in a browser. I know GnomeSword and MacSword have such a facility. I'd like to get some input here that I can reply with to jsword-devel. I seemed to recall that the general consensus is