We've got a discussion going on jsword-devel regarding how to represent
custom URLs for sword that will work in a browser. I know GnomeSword and
MacSword have such a facility.
I'd like to get some input here that I can reply with to jsword-devel.
I seemed to recall that the general consensus is that we should use
sword:// as the protocol, but I am seeking advice on what should follow,
especially for GenBooks.
IIRC, what we were thinking was that it should be
protocol://osisRef(,osisRef)*
But that poses problems when one wants to specify the work because the
definition of a URI doesn't allow : for this use.
e.g. sword://KJV:Gen.1.1-Gen.1.3,KJV:Gen.2.9
OSIS allows the workID to contain letters, digits and the _ and osisIDs
have parts separated by '.', where the parts can contain anything except
spaces.
So the question is what to substitute for the ':' ?
I'm thinking of (workID) as in sword://(KJV)Gen.1.1-Gen.1.3,(KJV):Gen.2.2
And how would one specify, a parallel request?
I'm thinking of the following:
protocol://(workID(,workID)*)?osisRef(,(workID(,workID)*)?osisRef)*
e.g. sword://(KJV,ESV)Gen.1.1-Gen.1.3,(KJV,ESV):Gen.2.2
The next part of the question relates to the proper representation of a
GenBook key as an osisID.
If we understand '.' as OSIS's hierarchical separator, e.g. Gen.1.1 is
Book -> Chapter -> Verse, then a GenBook with a hierarchy to a node of A
-> B -> C would be "A.B.C"
The problem is that in a GenBook, the key is generally a title, with
spaces and possibly periods. I was thinking a simple substitution of _
for spaces and something else, perhaps '/' for periods.
But _ and / are valid in a osisID.
Here is an example from Josephus (with '.' added for purposes of this
discussion)
workID = Josephus
The War of The Jews. -> Book 1. -> Chapter 2. -> Section 3.
Possible osisID:
Josephus:The_War_of_the_Jews/.Book_1/.Chapter_2/.Section_3/
While osisIDs use '.' as a path separator, URIs use '/'. So would one
change do the swap of '.' and '/' when representing the osisID as a URI?
e.g.
(Josephus)The_War_of_the_Jews./Book_1./Chapter_2./Section_3.
And if we do that what about Bible references, would they become
sword://(KJV)Gen/1/1 ? (I don't think that makes sense)
Thanks in advance!
In Him,
DM
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
