On Jan 26, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
> DM Smith wrote:
>> On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>>
>>
>>> am I forced to
>>> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the
>>> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app?
>>>
>>
>> On
DM Smith wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> am I forced to
>> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the
>> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app?
>>
>
> Only the server for the reason you stated. This is a fun
On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
> am I forced to
> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the
> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app?
Only the server for the reason you stated. This is a fundamental
loophole/flaw in the GPL.
On Jan 26, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
> This is full of angst and ignorance. I would expect that of a child
> but
> not a Christian. If you can not develop a frontend (for example) in
> whatever OSI approved license you choose then I believe that is one of
> the many reasons why
Thank you for being a voice of reason and self control.
There are valid issues for the protecting of work and the desire to
allow for wide dissemination that get burried under pagan trivia and
self serving agendas and rage.
My concern is that the portions I write not be viral. I am not really
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has already
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>>
>> Some believe the GPL to be restrictive and
Chris Little wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
>> already
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>>
>
> Sword and all works based
On Jan 26, 2008, at 8:53 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> The upshot is that it may not be possible
> to use Sword with any other third party code that is open source.
This is worded badly. I only mean to point out that there are some
licenses that are not compatible and third party code licensed under
On Jan 26, 2008, at 3:12 AM, Chris Little wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
>> already
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>
> Sword and
On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
> On that subject
>
> Free as in Freedom
>
> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
> already
> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
Sword and all works based on it, including all frontends, are licensed
On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jason Galyon wrote:
> On that subject
>
> Free as in Freedom
>
> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has already
> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>
> Some believe the GPL to be restrictive and freedom destroying. What
> about othe
On that subject
Free as in Freedom
Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has already
been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
Some believe the GPL to be restrictive and freedom destroying. What
about other open source licenses like the Python license for exam
12 matches
Mail list logo
