DM Smith wrote: > On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote: > > >> am I forced to >> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the >> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app? >> > > Only the server for the reason you stated. This is a fundamental > loophole/flaw in the GPL. > > That said, our desire is that the Sword library not be used in a > commercial endeavor, directly or indirectly. Protecting this has > helped us in negotiations with content providers. > > > and that will be honored
the inquiry was to find out what was possible, looks like I have an answer for that and what the concerns are Thanks for your insight. Would it offend if a client application was written in another OSI approved license? This would not open up sword for commercial use as far as I can see. > _______________________________________________ > sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org > http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page > Thank you for your reasoning and cool headedness, amazing how an honest request for information results in such chaos. _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
