Is there someone capable of implementing Reader View for all the pages on our
main site?
Several years ago there was a splurge of activity to improve the pages, but we
are now in the age of mobile phones.
Best regards
David
Sent from ProtonMail Mobile__
Hi everyone,
Is anyone looking after the CrossWire website these days?
There are several out of date items in various pages on our main website.
The site is not mobile friendly - there is no reader view in Safari, etc.
Viewing our pages via a smart phone is difficult.
Best regards,
David
Sent
On Nov 8, 2010, at 6:35 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> I tend to dislike software that forces me to search in certain ways: whether
> it's "You must select the language before we show you what's available" or
> "You must select the type of book" or "You must select the publisher's
> repository",
On 11/08/2010 09:50 AM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> 1) Some of our Genbooks could easily be formatted as a commentary.
> Probably it also should be done and that would remove one reason to look
> somewhere else. But right now the distinction is not totally a sharp
> one. Maybe it would be worthwhile
On Mon, 08 Nov 2010 07:57:51 -0500
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Jonathan Morgan writes:
> > I tend to dislike software that forces me to search in certain ways:
> > whether it's "You must select the language before we show you what's
> > available" or "You must select the type of book" or "You must
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Jonathan Morgan writes:
>> I tend to dislike software that forces me to search in certain ways:
>> whether it's "You must select the language before we show you what's
>> available" or "You must select the type of book" or "You must select
Jonathan Morgan writes:
> I tend to dislike software that forces me to search in certain ways:
> whether it's "You must select the language before we show you what's
> available" or "You must select the type of book" or "You must select
> the publisher's repository", there will be some times when
On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:37 AM, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> On the one hand, I appreciate a desire for a combined all-repos view of
> what's available. It would be useful in some ways. On the other hand,
> I find it problematic for several reasons.
>
> - It depends on finding all repos operating.
On the one hand, I appreciate a desire for a combined all-repos view of
what's available. It would be useful in some ways. On the other hand,
I find it problematic for several reasons.
- It depends on finding all repos operating. Like it or not, repos go
away for short or long periods, and the
On Sat, Nov 6, 2010 at 2:06 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> On 11/05/2010 02:02 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> > 2. Offering a list of downloads at CrossWire tends to suggest that they
> > are the *only* books available. While I can download zip files from
> > Xiphos FTP directly (for example), it's
On 11/05/2010 02:02 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> 2. Offering a list of downloads at CrossWire tends to suggest that they
> are the *only* books available. While I can download zip files from
> Xiphos FTP directly (for example), it's not easy to find out about, and
> I'm sure some people evaluate t
On Fri, Jan 2, 2009 at 7:08 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> I also do think there should be ways of making it work with a single
> sheet, making IE fail gracefully rather than badly. Any suggestions are
> welcome. I presume the key will be around exploiting a non implemented
> child/relation pseudo
Chris Little wrote:
>
>
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> With regard to browser inconsistencies I am trying to keep the two
>> stylesheets in sync, but if I missed something, please tell me.
>>
>> I also do think there should be ways of making it work with a single
>> sheet, making IE fail gracefully
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
With regard to browser inconsistencies I am trying to keep the two
stylesheets in sync, but if I missed something, please tell me.
I also do think there should be ways of making it work with a single
sheet, making IE fail gracefully rather than badly. Any suggestions ar
Chris,
I do think that this discussion should be on the list. Hence I take it
back there.
>> Peter von Kaehne said
>> I do not experiment with live sites.
>
> Chris Little said
> My comments pertained to the CrossWire site, which has seen various
> experiments over the last few days, relating t
Am 11.12.2008 um 22:19 schrieb Eeli Kaikkonen:
> Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>>
>> This might be nitpicking but even though Java, QT, GTK, wxWindows and
>> TclTk may work without X on Mac, they are not considered "native"
>> concerning applications with GUI. Only Cocoa is. Carbon is dying,
>> too.
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 3:04 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> David Haslam wrote:
>> Why do we have things like this in the middle of sentences?
>>
>> " Bible Technologies Conference (http://www.bibletechnologies.org) "
>>
>> rather than a properly named external link with a hidden URL?
>>
>> " http://www.b
David Haslam wrote:
> Why do we have things like this in the middle of sentences?
>
> " Bible Technologies Conference (http://www.bibletechnologies.org) "
>
> rather than a properly named external link with a hidden URL?
>
> " http://www.bibletechnologies.org/ Bible Technologies Conference "
>
>
Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>
> This might be nitpicking but even though Java, QT, GTK, wxWindows and
> TclTk may work without X on Mac, they are not considered "native"
> concerning applications with GUI. Only Cocoa is. Carbon is dying, too.
>
>
> Manfred
>
>
It's nitpicking regarding the webp
Ben Morgan wrote:
> I agree that MacSword should be at the top.
It is now
> BPBible does run under Mac (with some slight problems), but I didn't
> have time to package it up properly before the release of 0.4, so anyone
> wanting to use it would have to install python 2.5 and wxPython and
> build
Why do we have things like this in the middle of sentences?
" Bible Technologies Conference (http://www.bibletechnologies.org) "
rather than a properly named external link with a hidden URL?
" http://www.bibletechnologies.org/ Bible Technologies Conference "
The URL would show in the browser
Am 11.12.2008 um 21:59 schrieb DM Smith:
> Manfred Bergmann wrote:
>> Am 11.12.2008 um 21:13 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
>>
>>
If we have a Java section, I'm not sure all the java programs
should
also go into all the other groups, as well. I'm not sure what I
think
is be
On Fri, Dec 12, 2008 at 7:59 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> > Am 11.12.2008 um 21:13 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
> >
> >
> >>> If we have a Java section, I'm not sure all the java programs should
> >>> also go into all the other groups, as well. I'm not sure what I
> >>> think
> >
Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Am 11.12.2008 um 21:13 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
>
>
>>> If we have a Java section, I'm not sure all the java programs should
>>> also go into all the other groups, as well. I'm not sure what I
>>> think
>>> is best. But if the Java apps do go under all the other gr
Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Am 11.12.2008 um 21:13 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
>
>>> If we have a Java section, I'm not sure all the java programs should
>>> also go into all the other groups, as well. I'm not sure what I
>>> think
>>> is best. But if the Java apps do go under all the other groups
Am 11.12.2008 um 21:13 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
>> If we have a Java section, I'm not sure all the java programs should
>> also go into all the other groups, as well. I'm not sure what I
>> think
>> is best. But if the Java apps do go under all the other groups, they
>> should not have highe
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Peter,
>
> Thank you again for owning this. Just a few quick comments.
>
> We have a google site search on the sword page which is really useful
> for searching the mailing list archives (among other things on the
> site). Maybe we could grab it from there.
I notic
Ryan wrote:
>> need to find a solution as IE6 can not deal with transparency
>>
>
> I sent this yesterday but it seems to have been missed so here it is
> again...
>
> LOOK HERE --> http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/ or the original site
> AND HERE --> http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/ f
> need to find a solution as IE6 can not deal with transparency
I sent this yesterday but it seems to have been missed so here it is
again...
LOOK HERE --> http://dean.edwards.name/IE7/ or the original site
AND HERE --> http://code.google.com/p/ie7-js/ for the new site
of a javascri
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:36 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Greg Hellings wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
Agree with the OS icons being jittery and needing to be made more obvious.
>>> Not jittery anymore, but a nbetter solution which is IE6 firm needs to
>>
Greg Hellings wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>
>>> Agree with the OS icons being jittery and needing to be made more obvious.
>>>
>> Not jittery anymore, but a nbetter solution which is IE6 firm needs to
>> be found.
>>
>
> Honestly? Do we really
Peter,
Thank you again for owning this. Just a few quick comments.
We have a google site search on the sword page which is really useful
for searching the mailing list archives (among other things on the
site). Maybe we could grab it from there.
My preference is that the Wiki, as a concept,
Greg Hellings wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>>> Agree with the OS icons being jittery and needing to be made more obvious.
>> Not jittery anymore, but a nbetter solution which is IE6 firm needs to
>> be found.
>
> Honestly? Do we really need to bend over backw
On Thu, Dec 11, 2008 at 1:15 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> Agree with the OS icons being jittery and needing to be made more obvious.
>
> Not jittery anymore, but a nbetter solution which is IE6 firm needs to
> be found.
Honestly? Do we really need to bend over backwards to support a
browser th
DM Smith wrote:
> Love the design!
Thanks. It is athe old design, cleaned up.
> Some nit-picks.
I was waiting for that ;-)
> Agree with the OS icons being jittery and needing to be made more obvious.
Not jittery anymore, but a nbetter solution which is IE6 firm needs to
be found.
> IMHO, th
David Haslam wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> First impressions are all positive. Here's some feedback.
Thanks
>
> Suggestion: add a site search feature, it probably doesn't need to use
> Javascript, just adapt Google to be a site specific search. It's free!
> After an FAQ, most site visitors use a s
Manfred Bergmann wrote:
> Otherwise very nice.
> Short and not overloaded. Texts have the right length. Like it.
Thanks!
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubs
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> It's definetely better, much better!
Thanks!
> One small graphical glitch: When I hover over the platform icons they
> change their shape, namely grow taller. Nothing serious but looks weird
> and disturbing because the whole row changes, not just the single icon.
> Th
jhphx wrote:
> It would probably be a good idea to have
> few words to indicate to people like me that the icon bar is a menu for
> finding compatible applications. Something simple, "Select an icon to
> list compatible applications."
Done
___
sword-
Chris Little wrote:
> Just a few quick comments:
>
> The page is looking nicely improved. I like that it is mostly visible
> from within a single screenful, with minimal scrolling necessary.
Thanks!
> Most of my complaints probably pertain the the icon bar. There's the
> strange mouseover grow
Stephen Denne wrote:
>> >From http://www.crosswire.org/index.jsp
> Clicking on the mobiles icon went to
> http://www.crosswire.org/index.jsp?section=Handhelds
> But produced a 500 response with this stack trace:
> Going instead to the Windows page, then clicking the mobiles page icon, went
> to t
>From http://www.crosswire.org/index.jsp
Clicking on the mobiles icon went to
http://www.crosswire.org/index.jsp?section=Handhelds
But produced a 500 response with this stack trace:
org.apache.jasper.JasperException: /index.jsp(171,1) File
"/pages/applications.jsp" not found
org.apache.ja
On Wed, Dec 10, 2008 at 11:09 PM, David Haslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Suggestion: add a site search feature, it probably doesn't need to use
> Javascript, just adapt Google to be a site specific search. It's free!
> After an FAQ, most site visitors use a site search, even to find stuff
> "sta
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> DM Smith wrote:
>
>> I'd like to see the banner and sidebar fixed and the content of the page
>> scroll (without frames, iframes or javascript). I'll see what I can do,
>> but don't hold your breath:)
>>
>>
>>
>
> Do you mean like this? http://www.student.oulu.f
the Library page is blank
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
DM Smith wrote:
>
> I'd like to see the banner and sidebar fixed and the content of the page
> scroll (without frames, iframes or javascript). I'll see what I can do,
> but don't hold your breath:)
>
>
Do you mean like this? http://www.student.oulu.fi/~eekaikko/stimer/
But again, IE may ruin
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> I like my icon bar for looking at software categories, but am not
> conviced yet by its handling. If someone has an idea how to make it less
> jumpy I would be grateful.
Here is a little something I just worked out. I changed only the CSS,
not the HTML. It works on FF3
Just a few quick comments:
The page is looking nicely improved. I like that it is mostly visible
from within a single screenful, with minimal scrolling necessary.
Most of my complaints probably pertain the the icon bar. There's the
strange mouseover growth behavior that others have mentioned. M
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> After a last late night session with Troy to hammer out wording and some
> design flaws the new website for CrossWire is up and running.
>
> I have incorporated a lot of the ideas etc which were mentioned on the list.
>
> I am sure (actually I am aware of som
Am 10.12.2008 um 17:22 schrieb Eeli Kaikkonen:
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> Dear All,
>>
>> After a last late night session with Troy to hammer out wording and
>> some
>> design flaws the new website for CrossWire is up and running.
>>
>>
>
> One small graphical glitch: When I hover over the pl
Post-script: This sentence, "Instead of having a geographic domain,
CrossWire's domain is software users-- predominantly the global Internet--
or anyone we can reach across the wire." sort of excludes wireless.
It shouldn't! Please add something humorous to be inclusive of the wireless
world.
Hi Peter,
First impressions are all positive. Here's some feedback.
Suggestion: add a site search feature, it probably doesn't need to use
Javascript, just adapt Google to be a site specific search. It's free!
After an FAQ, most site visitors use a site search, even to find stuff
"staring t
Peter wrote:
> I like my icon bar for looking at software categories, but am not
> conviced yet by its handling. If someone has an idea how to make it less
> jumpy I would be grateful.
>
I like it too. I am a bit slow though and don't alway suspect icons of
hiding links I am interested in. Th
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> After a last late night session with Troy to hammer out wording and some
> design flaws the new website for CrossWire is up and running.
>
>
It's definetely better, much better!
One small graphical glitch: When I hover over the platform icons they
chang
Dear All,
After a last late night session with Troy to hammer out wording and some
design flaws the new website for CrossWire is up and running.
I have incorporated a lot of the ideas etc which were mentioned on the list.
I am sure (actually I am aware of some) there are enough problems left
wit
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Further we have lots of stale parts of the site - jira is one of them.
>> many of the bugs posted are 2 or 3 years old (or older).
>
> It's policy for GnomeSword that the bug list in SF's tracker is
> completely cleared befor
Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Further we have lots of stale parts of the site - jira is one of them.
> many of the bugs posted are 2 or 3 years old (or older).
It's policy for GnomeSword that the bug list in SF's tracker is
completely cleared before the next release is made.
This
kylehr writes
> For the newbs, by "project website" do you mean
> /www.crosswire.org/wiki?
No, and that is part of the problem. ;-) www.crosswire.org.
scribe writes
> And I'd love to give access to a few old-timer volunteers, who
> understand our terminology and goals, to update the CrossW
For the newbs, by "project website" do you mean /www.crosswire.org/wiki?
On Tue, Nov 11, 2008 at 1:22 PM, Troy A. Griffitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>wrote:
> Top posting because I am commenting in general on this thread.
>
> The CrossWire main page should be very brief, concise, clean, hardly
> ever ch
Top posting because I am commenting in general on this thread.
The CrossWire main page should be very brief, concise, clean, hardly
ever changed, and point people to project websites... and static.
We have a very strange situation. CrossWire is intended for 2 very
different groups of people.
60 matches
Mail list logo
