Le 20/02/2025 à 22:49, pierre amadio a écrit :
I have builded a module that fixes the missing verse issues and
include the verses suffixes in the osis file.
It looks like things are working as expected: xiphos can now show
1Kings 3:1 directly and the concatenation of "suffixed" verses seems
to
I have builded a module that fixes the missing verse issues and
include the verses suffixes in the osis file.
It looks like things are working as expected: xiphos can now show
1Kings 3:1 directly and the concatenation of "suffixed" verses seems
to work.
Now, I realise sword is still confused about
Thanks Troy,
Then perhaps you can explain why this happens (not just once, but several
times)?
- I started a thread in sword-devel.
- As a member of this list I should immediately receive a copy of my own email.
- I didn't.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [Proton Mail](https://proton.me/mail/ho
It’s been a long time since I looked at osis2mod, but my recollection is that
it 46, 46a, 46b, 46c are all seen as verse 46 and appended in the order that
they appear in the text.
osis2mod will store 46; 46 + 46a; 46 + 46a + 46b; and 46 + 46a + 46b + 46c into
the data file. It does this by look
Hi Troy,
One of the reasons I began use my Proton Mail account for the various CrossWire
mailing lists was because the CrossWire mail server was dumping everything from
any btinternet.com address into the SPAM dump!
I think the server setup needs a thorough vetting to stop it rubbishing genuine
David Haslam wrote:
My initial message in this thread was sent to *sword-devel*.
/Other than Michael & Karl, did anyone else receive it?/
For reasons I don't care to guess, I haven't seen David's emails in
sword-devel in a very long time -- years. I see his comments only in
quoted replies by
David,
I received it.
Regards.
Johan Marais
On 20 Feb 2025, at 16:20, David Haslam wrote:
Hi everyone,
My initial message in this thread was sent to sword-devel.
Other than Michael & Karl, did anyone else receive it?
Are any other SWORD/JSword front-end apps affected similarly?
i.e. Confuse
Le 20/02/2025 à 14:27, Arnaud Vié a écrit :
Hi all,
David, the OSIS ID "!" extensions that you mention are not really a
good way to handle this in theory, as they are "work-specific" and
they are ways to reference portions of verses : by nature, they might
be used for internal references (
Hi everyone,
My initial message in this thread was sent to sword-devel.
Other than Michael & Karl, did anyone else receive it?
Are any other SWORD/JSword front-end apps affected similarly?
i.e. Confused by the Abbreviation key clashing with another module Name.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [
Hi all,
David, the OSIS ID "!" extensions that you mention are not really a good
way to handle this in theory, as they are "work-specific" and they are ways
to reference portions of verses : by nature, they might be used for
internal references (a note text referencing a subverse in the same
docu
Just a quick note:
The engine parser has a 'suffix' concept so it understand John 3:16a ->
John 3:16 (suffix a)
I don't remember what osis2mod does, but I think it (or another of our
tools, e.g., imp2vs) may join all the suffix parts of a verse together
and place a literal (a), (b), (c)... a
Hi Pierre,
From pages 145-146 (page break removed) of the OSIS Reference Manual
> Appendix J.3 Extension (optional)
> While standard citation systems are well known and should be covered by the
> main part of the osisID, there are cases where such systems have been
> extended. Some of those ext
Hi there.
Cyrille informed me about this issue:
https://github.com/crosswire/xiphos/issues/1172
According to Karl,
"""
The deeper problem causing this mess is that LXX 1Kings 2 is pretty
braindamaged. Do mod2imp LXX > /tmp/lxx.imp and look at 1Kings 2. The
markup ends with a ridiculously long sin
13 matches
Mail list logo
