Andrew:
Thanks - it was the "PD" that had me puzzled. Reminds me of the story of
a bureaucrat who submitted a document and found "UNO" stamped all over
it at various places. He asked its meaning and was told, "Use No
Abbreviations."
Tom
Tom Sullivan
i...@beforgiven.info
FAX: 815-301-2835
--
Tom, PD is 'public domain'. Public Domain (PD) refers materials that are
not or no longer protected by intellectual property laws such as copyright,
trademark etc.
To confuse, different jurisdictions have different criteria for materials
to enter into the Public Domain. For example see the secti
Peter:
Thanks for your reply. Please excuse my ignorance: What is a "PD
document"? Thanks.
Tom
Tom Sullivan
i...@beforgiven.info
FAX: 815-301-2835
-
Great News!
God created you, owns you and gave you commands to obey.
You have disobeyed God - as your conscience very well
I agree with Peter. The original work and the derivative work are separate
cases.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:42 AM Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:54 -0400, Tom Sullivan wrote:
> > First, take Matthew Henry's or Calvin's commentaries. They are way
> > out
> > of copyright to
Peter, there's agreement here. Lets not ruin it ok?
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 10:32 AM Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 15:35 +0200, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> > This matter has been discussed ad nauseam on our mailing list several
> > years ago. Nothing has changed since.
>
> Andre
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 09:54 -0400, Tom Sullivan wrote:
> First, take Matthew Henry's or Calvin's commentaries. They are way
> out
> of copyright to say the least. Now some publishers may add OCR text,
> comments, footnotes, etc. These are copyrightable. Am I correct in
> thinking that the origin
On Mon, 2018-09-10 at 15:35 +0200, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> This matter has been discussed ad nauseam on our mailing list several
> years ago. Nothing has changed since.
Andrew claims he has not been afforded previous opportunity to discuss
this matter.
I am not sure what level of debate he nee
There is obviously much background of which I am unaware, but I do wish
to ask some questions for future reference.
First, take Matthew Henry's or Calvin's commentaries. They are way out
of copyright to say the least. Now some publishers may add OCR text,
comments, footnotes, etc. These are co
Yes agree .. except in the case where something being published a rote fact
(facts cannot be copyrighted) .. and derivative works are their own case in
copyright law. There's no dispute here.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:37 AM Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> This matter has been discussed ad nauseam on
This matter has been discussed ad nauseam on our mailing list several years ago. Nothing has changed since.
All written works including translations are copyrighted until the copyright expires.
We need a permission by the copyright owner or the copyrioght owner licenses the text freely.
If we d
Peter, what offered is to participate in civil discussion, and I will
honour that offer, as I hope you will too.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 9:23 AM Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
>
> You are being told not to discuss your rejected modules, offering test
> modules or distribute modules. As every single tec
You are being told not to discuss your rejected modules, offering test modules or distribute modules. As every single technical enquiry sent by you was coupled with just this, you are asked to refrain from that too.
Gesendet: Montag, 10. September 2018 um 14:05 Uhr
Von: "Andrew T."
An: "SWOR
I welcome honest discussion about it, I thirst for honest discussion about
it, more than I thirst for censorship at least. I have looked into the
copyright status of the DSS. What you say is partially correct. Each
separate manuscript’s translations (as found in Discoveries in Judean
Desert (DJ
Please, be patient and civil in this discussion, appreciating that
copyright and biblical texts are both important and that controversy
abounds when discussing both. Everyone's perspective is welcomed here:
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@cross
All of this was very helpful and I think it does expose the raw point
here. I haven’t been afforded the opportunity to present the case for DSS
yet - you won’t allow me to participate in it. But even if that’s the case
that’s not what I react to.
When I ask other questions, legitimate questions,
15 matches
Mail list logo
