Couple of points.A casual module developer does not need any of the utilities at their most up to date as we would not accept a module, but only a source text. So, as long is the OSIS etc is right, the rest is my concern as the module upload person.Someone who wants to do heavy lifting and on a reg
I also need the Windows utilities. We are a team of three people doing module development. We all have Windows workstations.
We do have a Linux machine that hosts our svn, but it would be a distinct disadvantage if I have to work out a way to execute the
module builds on the Linux box, partic
A few brief points:
The logs have this as the initial commit:
commit ecaac871e4fa607a32d81f1049e928795db4eaa1
Author: chrislit
Date: Wed Jan 11 19:45:21 2006 +
added OSISMorphSegmentation files (from BibleTime) to repository;
not integrated into projects/make system yet
git-sv
DM:
There may be a terminology problem here.
Re:
הַ
The letter He is used as the definite article and it is prepended to the
word. Example using English, L to R: "The Land" would be He-Eretz.
Hebrew also appends pronounimal suffixes, so perhaps those are segments
as well. The pronounimal suf
I have no idea. I can read and write C++, but it’s been over 20 years since I
did it on a regular basis. I’m not interested in trying to decipher the code or
what Chris L. had in mind. Just glancing at the code it says it pertains to WLC
and it has Morph and Segmentation in the name. That’s quit
On Fri, Dec 29, 2017 at 4:05 PM, David Haslam wrote:
> Thanks, Greg.
>
> Pretty sure I won't be the only person that uses Win32 editions of the
> utilities,
> even I have occasionally put in a reminder whenever there's a new release.
> :)
>
> As a Society, we should always remember that we are no
I know it's still the holiday season, yet I would still like to have it
explained what is the difference in output that we should see when the
OSISMorphSegmentation filter is applied.
There are modules which have this specified in the .conf file, yet I've not
seen any discernable difference in
Thanks, Greg.
Pretty sure I won't be the only person that uses Win32 editions of the
utilities,
even I have occasionally put in a reminder whenever there's a new release. :)
As a Society, we should always remember that we are not a one platform outfit,
and that there are module developers and te
You ask this every time there is an engine release and the answer is still
the same: there are no official builds of the utilities for Windows. The
only supported environment for running them is Linux and they are only
supported when running from Subversion HEAD. Anywhere that they run outside
of t
If the Win32 sword utilities have already been compiled for SWORD 1.8.0
release, where can I find them?
If they are not yet made, please would someone do the honours. Thanks.
btw. Was Karl's patch for diatheke -o M included ?
cf. Although he made the patch several months ago, it was not included
Hi DM,
I think you misunderstood me. I never said we have no existing modules with a
CC license. It's quite clear that we do.
I said "It's not about existing modules."
i.e. We don't have to change any released modules just because new CC licenses
have since appeared.
What I'm after is to clarif
Le 29/12/2017 à 17:52, DM Smith a écrit :
> My concern at the time was that once we’ve a v11n that has been released and
> modules have been built with it we really can’t change it. People keep
> modules around long after we’ve updated or obsoleted them. We want them to be
> able to update the
My concern at the time was that once we’ve a v11n that has been released and
modules have been built with it we really can’t change it. People keep modules
around long after we’ve updated or obsoleted them. We want them to be able to
update their front-end without losing functionality of the mod
Peter,
As you and others well know, I often edit our developers' wiki.
I'm not the expert in CrossWire about distribution licensing.
In this case, I require professional knowledge that's outside my area of
expertise.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure Ema
This is not about existing released modules.
It's about updating our advice/instructions for anyone making a new or updated
module.
We should update the details in our wiki page without waiting for any other
activity.
Best regards,
David
Sent with [ProtonMail](https://protonmail.com) Secure
This is my first post:
Le 05/06/2017 à 09:18, Cyrille a écrit :
> Hi,
> Working with Catholic bibles I realized that there were some errors in
> the versifications currently proposed.
> I found for all those in which I could verify the following errors:
> Ps 101 8 verses, not 9
> Job 25 6 verses n
Have any modules been released with CC? Chris added these licenses as
“supported.” I don’t see the point in updating the list to support what isn’t
reality. When we negotiate new content that has a particular license, we should
update it then.
DM
> On Dec 29, 2017, at 10:02 AM, David Haslam w
If you have asked before and no one else saw your sense of urgency, I guess it falls back to.you.to.fix it unless you want to.leave it unfixed. It is not exactly a programmer's task. I personally never use CC licenses and see no.urgency in it from my side, hence.Sent from my mobile. Please forgive
Dear all,
It's imperative that we provide accurate advice to SWORD module makers.
Please visit
https://crosswire.org/wiki/DevTools:conf_Files#Copyright_.26_Licensing_related_elements
Since this table was constructed a long time ago, there have been several new
versions released for all the Cre
19 matches
Mail list logo
