I have reached the stage where I can compare the new Wycliffe module *v2.0*
with the old Wycliffe module *v1.0* which was for the *Pentateuch and
Gospels* only.
This has brought to light the fact that v1.0 contains 299 in-line notes in
the form: *[Note: . ]*.
These are *not* included in the W
The long prayer is actually known as "[This preyere of Manasses is not in
Ebrue]"
See *page 475* in
http://quod.lib.umich.edu/c/cme/AFZ9170.0001.001/1:18.37?rgn=div2;view=fulltext
It's part of the prologue to the book of Ezra (I Esdras) in Wycliffe's
Bible.
It's not adequately marked up on
Just corrected the versification on Wikisource for
https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Bible_(Wycliffe)/3_Esdras
See https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Talk:Bible_(Wycliffe)/3_Esdras
"This is the 9 chapter book of Greek Ezra in the LXX, called 2 Esdras in
Russian Bibles, and called 3 Esdras in the Vulgate
The prayer mentioned in my earlier reply is counted as *2 Chronicles
36:24-27* in this site:
http://www.bible.pearmobile.com/chapters.php?id=10403&pid=16&tid=1&bid=76
Viz. (below my sign off)
That site omits the Deuterocanonical books, though.
David
---
24 Lord God Almyyti of our fadris,
Progressing with the module build.
After I generated the OSIS file, I manually replaced *EpJer.1* with *Bar.6*
and joined the two books together by removing the and in between *Bar.5* and *Bar.6*
Now I've come across something new that I'd not read of before.
A long single verse prayer as *2Ch
My friend in Jerusalem has replied as follows:
You are correct. Shin and Sin are really two different letters (i.e.,
‘consonants’), and the Shin dot and the Sin dot are what differentiate them.
So although these two dots /are/ diacritics, they are *not* vowel signs.
That explains why the *UTF8Heb
This is why I encountered such a problem.
The av11n for *Vulg* uses the /standard/ *osisID* names for *Esther* and
*Daniel* rather than the more specific names for *Greek Esther* and *Greek
Daniel*.
The Python script *wycliffe.py* uses the latter, along with the
corresponding USFM names.
Strictly
OK, then supposing *2TGreek* were to be rebuilt using the LXX *av11n* for the
OT part, would we not therefore require a /new/ av11n for *LXX+NT* ?
It's not just a question related to the Xiphos module.
The answer could also assist our friends at Tyndale STEP.
Regards,
David
--
View this messa
I've put the detailed question by email to one of my friends who is an
Hebraist.
Will report when he replies.
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Hebrew-OSHB-and-WLC-Bible-modules-do-not-fully-remove-all-accenting-diacritics-when-those-settings-a-tp465
