On Tue, 2014-03-18 at 12:21 -0700, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> I think it is important to maintain the
> SWCom distinction and that SWCom should not conceptually inherit SWText,
> though I do understand why you propose such to reduce code duplication.
Complex commentaries I have seen will re-run
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 22:45 +0200, Caleb Maclennan wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Peter Von Kaehne
> wrote:
> That is a misunderstanding. For historical reasons our source
> commit mailing list is still called sword-cvs, but we use svn
> for many many years.
>
>
On Thu, 2014-03-20 at 14:32 -0700, David Haslam wrote:
> Both source texts ought really to have used the misnamed CGJ, as explained
> in the Core Specification.
I think you need to post this upstream, unless our modules are at fault
- i.e. we replaced one sign with another during our import. I dou
Further analysis illustrates that my conjecture was correct.
The ZWJ is used to separate two Hebrew points in the WLC module.
In each case, the point after the ZWJ was always the METEG.
The point before the ZWJ was either the PATAH or the SEGOL.
In module MapM, it's a lot more complicated, with
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 6:59 PM, Peter Von Kaehne wrote:
> That is a misunderstanding. For historical reasons our source commit
> mailing list is still called sword-cvs, but we use svn for many many years.
My mistake. The last time I mucked around with it it was CVS and recent
discussions have
