Further analysis illustrates that my conjecture was correct.

The ZWJ is used to separate two Hebrew points in the WLC module.

In each case, the point after the ZWJ was always the METEG.
The point before the ZWJ was either the PATAH or the SEGOL.

In module MapM, it's a lot more complicated, with accents as well as points
involved.
Yet the principle is the same.

Both source texts ought really to have used the misnamed CGJ, as explained
in the Core Specification.

Analysis results available upon request.

David



--
View this message in context: 
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Zero-Width-Joiner-in-Hebrew-modules-tp4653749p4653797.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to