Sword should support basic indents and line breaks. Content providers
should be able to control the formatting of their texts and should not
be required to assign their content to artificial ... or other
containers to do so. Although these containers might be useful, the text
of some translatio
Contact Dr. Gail Riplinger to see if she can help. www.avpublications.com
If anyone is likely to have what you need or know where you can get
what you need it is her!
On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:14 PM, Barnes, Jeffrey wrote:
On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:45:52PM, DM Smith wrote:
I maintain the KJV
On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:14 PM, "Barnes, Jeffrey" wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:45:52PM, DM Smith wrote:
>
>> I maintain the KJV 1769. This is frequently and mistakenly referred to as
>> the 1611 version.
>>
>
> Most of the folks in my circles who read KJV know the difference, although
>
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 3:14 PM, Barnes, Jeffrey wrote:
>
> You mean U+017F? Seems like that would be a pretty easy regex. I think
> it's only a lower case entry that appears only if it is not the last
> character in a word. Any other glyphs?
>
Most attempts I see to use that character replace it
On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:45:52PM, DM Smith wrote:
> I maintain the KJV 1769. This is frequently and mistakenly referred to as the
> 1611 version.
>
Most of the folks in my circles who read KJV know the difference, although many
would not know the difference between 1769 and AKJV.
> We'd love t
I'm unaware of the 1611 being available in SWORD format from anywhere. The
1769 version is what we have in our repositories as it is, by far, the one
most people are thinking of when they claim to be talking about the 1611
version.
If there is a reasonable digital source of the text it should not
I maintain the KJV 1769. This is frequently and mistakenly referred to as the
1611 version.
You can see on the wiki Gen 1: http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/KJV_1611
We'd love to have the 1611 text but have not found a suitable etext. I'm
looking for one that has the long 's' which looks like an f.
I've seen the objections to the AV on the Crosswire website.
Is there a 1611 Sword module available anywhere? It's interesting to see that
the OSIS tutorial uses 1611 text.
The poetry and flow of the version I find to be beautiful. It would be nice to
be able to get it as a Sword module instead
On Apr 11, 2013, at 10:40:11AM, David Haslam wrote:
> A bookmarks sharing concept began to be considered - but it seems to be on
> the back burner since last July.
>
> See http://crosswire.org/wiki/Frontends:URI_Standard
>
> David
>
Didn't see it there, but I did see it here.
http://crosswir
A bookmarks sharing concept began to be considered - but it seems to be on
the back burner since last July.
See http://crosswire.org/wiki/Frontends:URI_Standard
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/missing-books-testament-in-modules-tp4652127p4652131.ht
Hi Nick,
I haven't been able to reproduce it, but have had one report which I
suspect is similar for BPBible.
Jon
On Thu, Apr 11, 2013 at 4:40 PM, Nic Carter wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
>
> I have recently received several reports that the latest version of
> PocketSword will sometimes "loose" the en
Hi Nic, developers,
I noticed two minor discrepancies in PocketSword I'd like to report.
1. Sometimes when I use the Select Book feature in the KJV module, the current
book isn't highlighted in the list. Most of the time it is, I'm not sure how to
trigger a repro case.
2. Sometimes (usually whe
Nic,
Google around and see if there is a max open file limit for an app on iOS. If
so, drop the open files limit in FileMgr.
Nic Carter wrote:
>
>Hi guys,
>
>I have recently received several reports that the latest version of
>PocketSword will sometimes "loose" the entire OT or NT for a module.
13 matches
Mail list logo
