On Apr 11, 2013, at 4:14 PM, "Barnes, Jeffrey" <jbarnes...@yahoo.com> wrote:
>
> On Apr 11, 2013, at 1:45:52PM, DM Smith <dmsm...@crosswire.org> wrote:
>
>> I maintain the KJV 1769. This is frequently and mistakenly referred to as
>> the 1611 version.
>>
>
> Most of the folks in my circles who read KJV know the difference, although
> many would not know the difference between 1769 and AKJV.
>
>> We'd love to have the 1611 text but have not found a suitable etext. I'm
>> looking for one that has the long 's' which looks like an f. If you know of
>> one, let me know.
>
> You mean U+017F? Seems like that would be a pretty easy regex. I think it's
> only a lower case entry that appears only if it is not the last character in
> a word. Any other glyphs?
Yes there are other glyphs. There is one for "and" (it is something like &) and
another for "the" (an y with a e above). There are a few others but I don't
remember them off the top of my head.
I think u017f is the long s (I don't have it memorized). Substituting non
terminal s with it is fairly close but not quite there. A regex would not be
accurate enough, imho.
In Him,
DM
_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
