This afternoon I spoke with my project leader at Wycliffe and I asked
the team about this project. They were, of course, familiar with it,
since he is the manager for the general Wycliffe-on-Linux work and
FieldWorks is one of those tasks.
Apparently they were unaware that GoBible is a CrossWire p
As I'd already posted to the wiki page before Troy joined the thread, please
feel free to make suitable corrections to the section I added.
The tech details are getting a tad beyond my comprehension.
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Encoding
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.35
On 31/08/11 07:47, DM Smith wrote:
> Troy, User's typically input decomposed text for a search request.
> The module is typically composed text. When creating a lucene index
> is the text decomposed and then stripped? (I don't remember seeing
> that in the code.)
Yes the strip filters are run du
On 08/31/2011 08:30 AM, Konstantin Maslyuk wrote:
Or can someone just tell me what to do with strong numbers that are in
original text but was omitted in target text. Can i also omit them or
i should add those strongs on any most appropriate word, if omitted
word is sentence beginning/ending
Troy,
User's typically input decomposed text for a search request. The module
is typically composed text. When creating a lucene index is the text decomposed
and then stripped? (I don't remember seeing that in the code.)
DM
On Aug 31, 2011, at 9:21 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Quickl
Quickly before posting, this data is not entirely accurate.
I've posted this a number of times and hope frontends have taken this to
heart.
SWORD has the concept of preparing a text for searching.
Modules can add StripFilters to do whatever preparation they want to do
for searching.
SWModule make
Done.
See http://crosswire.org/wiki/Encoding#Normalization
http://crosswire.org/wiki/Encoding#Normalization
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Normalization-tp3779484p3780930.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Thanks DM.
The responses in this thread are really informative. Could we post them
somewhere in the wiki, please?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Normalization-tp3779484p3780893.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
__
>> Or can someone just tell me what to do with strong numbers that are in
>> original text but was omitted in target text. Can i also omit them or
>> i should add those strongs on any most appropriate word, if omitted
>> word is sentence beginning/ending can i also just put strong number on
>>
On Aug 31, 2011, at 4:01 AM, David Haslam wrote:
> Thanks for detailed comments on rendering.
>
> Are there any implications for the search feature of SWORD/JSword when using
> combining characters?
The simple rule is that if a search request and the indexed text are not
normalized the same, t
On Aug 31, 2011, at 5:37 AM, Konstantin Maslyuk wrote:
> Hi, all.
>
> Is there any king of guidelines or manual on Strong's numbers
> assignment on text?
In OSIS they should surround the text to which they pertain. In other markup,
they are placed after the word or phrase.
>
> Or ca
Hi, all.
Is there any king of guidelines or manual on Strong's numbers
assignment on text?
Or can someone just tell me what to do with strong numbers that are in
original text but was omitted in target text. Can i also omit them or
i should add those strongs on any most appropriate w
Thanks for detailed comments on rendering.
Are there any implications for the search feature of SWORD/JSword when using
combining characters?
David
--
View this message in context:
http://sword-dev.350566.n4.nabble.com/Normalization-tp3779484p3780433.html
Sent from the SWORD Dev mailing list ar
13 matches
Mail list logo