On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 11:49 AM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Greg Hellings
>>> wrote:
> 4. Bible references from commentaries, etc. use this mast
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:09 AM, Chris Little wrote:
> As a content encoder, XML editors give me the best results when I want to
> find encoding errors. They tend to give a better indication of patterns of
> errors, whereas validators might only give the first error they identify and
> then quit.
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 11:58 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Greg Hellings
>> wrote:
4. Bible references from commentaries, etc. use this master versification.
>>>
>>> Then the module creator needs to go
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Chris Little wrote:
So write it and submit a patch.
[Some basic requirements: Don't add library dependencies to Sword itself,
make the validator toggleable at runtime, and ensure that the validation
library is in C/C++ and can compile un
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:08 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
>>> 4. Bible references from commentaries, etc. use this master versification.
>>
>> Then the module creator needs to go through and convert all of their
>> references to that master vers
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:44 PM, Eeli Kaikkonen
wrote:
> Familie von Kaehne wrote:
>> Not correct. The TSK or any other reference work will have used an
>> underlying particular versification - even if this is not documented.
>
> Not only that, but TSK uses explicitly several versifications. It ref
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Chris Little wrote:
>>> Basically, alternate versification support is phase 1. Mapping between
>>> versifications is phase 2.
>>
>> And I'm saying I do
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> Basically, alternate versification support is phase 1. Mapping between
> versifications is phase 2.
>
> Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>>
>> I am also concerned about the choice of using Genbooks to represent
>> books, just based (as far as I can tell)
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 7:48 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> The job of osis2mod, at this point in time, is to take valid OSIS modules as
> input and to normalize that into OSIS that the SWORD engine supports. This
> normalized OSIS is then chunked into introductions and verses and stored in
> a module.
>
>
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> So write it and submit a patch.
>
> [Some basic requirements: Don't add library dependencies to Sword itself,
> make the validator toggleable at runtime, and ensure that the validation
> library is in C/C++ and can compile under Win32 and with
Hi,
I just released Alkitab Bible Study 2.1, it is available at
http://www.kiyut.com/products/alkitab/index.html
The source code is available under developer sections.
What's New:
- Add Defintions/Dictionary searching
- Add Syntax Highlight for View Source (OSIS and HTML)
- Add delay 500 miliseco
Eeli wrote:
Should the frontend give possibility to change the default v11n? Users
may have accustomed to a certain scheme and would like to use it for
all modules so that they can use their favorite translation and still
find references in other modules easily.
IMO: It would be good if the
Wolfgang,
I guess I wasn't clear enough. I think all detected errors should
produce a message. And what I didn't say, but meant to, was that I'll
output an error message for an unsupported BOM.
In Him,
DM
On Jan 6, 2009, at 11:15 AM, Wolfgang Schultz wrote:
Hello,
here we see th
Hello,
here we see the difference between user centric programming and
ideological influence on how to make programms :))
On my opinion i would change osis2mod ( and also vpl2mod) so that it
isn't an obstacle for using in any situation BOM or not BOM.
However osis2mod should print out a
Ian Wagner wrote:
See http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom1. It indicates the
encoding that the file is written in, be it big-endian (most
siginificant byte to least significant byte-- the way that we write,
and the way the PowerPC stores numbers in memory), or little-endian
(the reverse an
Wolfgang Schultz wrote:
Hello,
if the utf-8 OSIS file has a BOM ( Byte Order Mark some editors
insert one) Osis2Mod will fail to make a sword-modul, it were nice if
this would be fixed, because it will cause lot of problems in further
steps :(
The BOM in UTF-8 is generally a Windows-ism. No
Actually, if I would have read down further, it explicitly says "Yes,
UTF-8 can contain a BOM. However, it makes no difference as to the
endianness of the byte stream. UTF-8 always has the same byte order.
An initial BOM is only used as a signature — an indication that an
otherwise unmarked
See http://unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#bom1. It indicates the
encoding that the file is written in, be it big-endian (most
siginificant byte to least significant byte-- the way that we write,
and the way the PowerPC stores numbers in memory), or little-endian
(the reverse and the way intel
Wolfgang Schultz wrote:
Hello,
if the utf-8 OSIS file has a BOM ( Byte Order Mark some editors
insert one) Osis2Mod will fail to make a sword-modul, it were nice if
this would be fixed, because it will cause lot of problems in further
steps :(
What does a byte order mark mean for a UTF-8 fi
On Jan 6, 2009, at 3:14 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
I feel that, rather than useless debates about whether certain
people's modules are valid ThML or whether valid OSIS has been
submitted to CrossWire or not, we should augment osis2mod, imp2mod and
friends to use a validating XML parser. That w
Hello,
if the utf-8 OSIS file has a BOM ( Byte Order Mark some editors
insert one) Osis2Mod will fail to make a sword-modul, it were nice if
this would be fixed, because it will cause lot of problems in further
steps :(
grettings
wolfgang
http//www.zefania.de
_
On Dec 19, 2008, at 11:37 PM, Tonny Kohar wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 6:00 AM, DM Smith
wrote:
Tonny Kohar wrote:
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 20, 2008 at 2:41 AM, Tonny Kohar
wrote:
Hi,
On Fri, Dec 19, 2008 at 9:06 PM, DM Smith
wrote:
Both MacSword and JSword will set the instal
Hello Karl,
there is the new release with the newline, please test and report any
another problems...
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/bibleworkplace/sword_neue_v1_1.zip?use_mirror=heanet
thanx
wolfgang
http://www.zefania.de
2009/1/4 Karl Kleinpaste :
> The .conf does not end with a newline
Hello;
Here are the sources (Zefania XML, Osis and Sword Module) in SVN
http://zefania-sharp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/zefania-sharp/trunk/sf_volxbibel/
have fun
wolfgang
http://www.zefania.de
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
Hello,
there are the sources (Zefania XML, OSIS and SWORD -module) in SVN
http://zefania-sharp.svn.sourceforge.net/viewvc/zefania-sharp/trunk/sf_neue/
have fun
wolfgang
http://www.zefania.de
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http
2009/1/4 DM Smith :
> Some of our software won't read a line that does not end with a new line.
Hello,
ok i will change this next release, which software has problems? Sword
for Windows and BPBible haven't problems with reading the file.
wolfgang
___
Hi there ...
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
Exactly: and I say that is the wrong argument to use. We should have
something that suits the problem, and I'm not convinced Genbook does.
I think there may be a lack of understanding here: GenBook is poroposed
as using the new versetreekey code which
Greg Hellings wrote:
So how do we label them? ""? Because the
reason that they're in that version is because they're probably
considered canonical by someone.
Just to qualify what I said previously about the purpose of the
canonical attribute: it's intended to identify the canonicity of a
s
Familie von Kaehne wrote:
Not correct. The TSK or any other reference work will have used an
underlying particular versification - even if this is not documented.
Not only that, but TSK uses explicitly several versifications. It refers
to LXX with LXX versification. It's indicated by "book c
So write it and submit a patch.
[Some basic requirements: Don't add library dependencies to Sword
itself, make the validator toggleable at runtime, and ensure that the
validation library is in C/C++ and can compile under Win32 and with GCC.]
--Chris
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
I feel that, rathe
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:39 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Chris Little wrote:
>> Basically, alternate versification support is phase 1. Mapping between
>> versifications is phase 2.
>
> And I'm saying I don't believe it is ready for use without phase 2.
And what I
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:05 PM, Chris Little wrote:
> Basically, alternate versification support is phase 1. Mapping between
> versifications is phase 2.
And I'm saying I don't believe it is ready for use without phase 2.
Jon
___
sword-devel mailing l
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:51 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> Executive summary: I do not believe that alternate versification is
>> useful without mapping between versifications, and I am not convinced
>> that it is useful doing alternate versif
Basically, alternate versification support is phase 1. Mapping between
versifications is phase 2.
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
I am also concerned about the choice of using Genbooks to represent
books, just based (as far as I can tell) on the fact that we already
have Genbook support. Is there any t
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 1:49 AM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> Executive summary: I do not believe that alternate versification is
> useful without mapping between versifications, and I am not convinced
> that it is useful doing alternate versification with Genbooks.
>
> All of the work and discussion t
On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 2:20 PM, Familie von Kaehne wrote:
> Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>> Executive summary: I do not believe that alternate versification is
>> useful without mapping between versifications, and I am not convinced
>> that it is useful doing alternate versification with Genbooks.
>>
>>
Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> Executive summary: I do not believe that alternate versification is
> useful without mapping between versifications, and I am not convinced
> that it is useful doing alternate versification with Genbooks.
>
> All of the work and discussion that I have seen on alternate
> v
I feel that, rather than useless debates about whether certain
people's modules are valid ThML or whether valid OSIS has been
submitted to CrossWire or not, we should augment osis2mod, imp2mod and
friends to use a validating XML parser. That way we could be quite
sure that anything that has been c
38 matches
Mail list logo
