On Tue, Jan 6, 2009 at 3:40 PM, Chris Little <chris...@crosswire.org> wrote: > So write it and submit a patch. > > [Some basic requirements: Don't add library dependencies to Sword itself, > make the validator toggleable at runtime, and ensure that the validation > library is in C/C++ and can compile under Win32 and with GCC.]
It was the expected answer, but my answer is: no. I do not have time to spend on it. I have not strongly complained about validity of modules. My statement is that if you care about validity, you would better spend your time enforcing validity in the importer than arguing about it on a mailing list. Jon _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page
