Chris Little wrote:
>
> Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Chris Little wrote:
>>> AquinasSummaTheologica is a recent submission from Pedro Giffuni, based
>>> on CCEL's (ca. 2002) OSIS 1.1 edition, converted to OSIS 2.1.1.
>> Just a quick thought: AquinaSummaTheologica is an awfully lon
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Chris Little wrote:
>> AquinasSummaTheologica is a recent submission from Pedro Giffuni, based
>> on CCEL's (ca. 2002) OSIS 1.1 edition, converted to OSIS 2.1.1.
>
> Just a quick thought: AquinaSummaTheologica is an awfully long name for
> a module. I
Am 16.06.2008 um 22:45 schrieb DM Smith:
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> The way we work with software is
>>
>> 1) multiple independent projects
>> 2) each project has one or several leads
>> 3) there are other contributors with and without write access to the
>> project repository
>> 4) all project
Am 16.06.2008 um 22:35 schrieb Sebastien Koechlin:
> On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:43:38PM +0100, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> a) having a raw text repository where the texts are kept in some
>> import
>> format (OSIS, ThML, whatever) under version control
>> b) with named module owner(s) and contri
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 9:42 PM, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:23 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
>
>> I'm looking through the mod2osis.cpp file, trying to bring its output
>> closer into the form of the module inputs (basing it off of the result
>> of running the tool as c
On Mon, 16 Jun 2008, Chris Little wrote:
> AquinasSummaTheologica is a recent submission from Pedro Giffuni, based
> on CCEL's (ca. 2002) OSIS 1.1 edition, converted to OSIS 2.1.1.
Just a quick thought: AquinaSummaTheologica is an awfully long name for
a module. I think most of the frontends depen
On Jun 16, 2008, at 9:23 PM, Greg Hellings wrote:
> I'm looking through the mod2osis.cpp file, trying to bring its output
> closer into the form of the module inputs (basing it off of the result
> of running the tool as compared to the KJV input files). So far I
> seem to have the following prob
I'm looking through the mod2osis.cpp file, trying to bring its output
closer into the form of the module inputs (basing it off of the result
of running the tool as compared to the KJV input files). So far I
seem to have the following problems - I can't seem to find where (or
if) the following info
If you would like to help with this, you can download the source
document in Zefania XML, make the corrections, and submit it to them and
to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=89078&package_id=93533&release_id=339281
--Chris
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> This m
If you put Leeser, GerNeu and GerTafel, GerLuther1912 and GerLuther1545
next to each other at chapters Gen 31:55 - Gen 32 end you will see the
German versification of the content diverges grossly - not just from the
KJV/Leeser, but also from each other.
Same in Exodus 8.
I am now too tired to pur
This module has a number of poorly encoded verses - please see Wiki
Needs correction
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above
Please take a look at the two Summa Theologica modules I've just
uploaded. I would like an opinion on which seems to be a better module
(and should be moved towards the public repository).
SummaTheologica is quite an old module (from 2003) and was previously
available in the beta repository as
Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> A series of three characters in GS which can not be rendered. in BD
> these characters appear as a single star. The place appears uniform in
> the front of SEIGNEUR or DIEU
Ben Morgan discussed this on 11 Jun, in response to your observation
about Chi
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Sebastien Koechlin wrote:
>> When FreJND will be in beta, I don't know how I will be able to make
>> corrections.
>
> Is now in Beta
>
Problems with the module as it stands are few as far as I can determine
In Mal1:9 and Mat1:20 I noted - and then subsequently in aq nu
Sebastien Koechlin wrote:
> I think it's a very good idea. As a module maintainer (FreJND), I'm on the
> list for more than a year. I submited a module on January 1st, and it's
> still not in the beta repository. I asked friends to review it, but as it is
> still not in beta, they can not install
Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I didn't see any problems during a quick browse using BibleCS. Unless
> you can provide a better indication of where precisely in the module the
> problem is occurring, I'm going to suggest it's probably a GS-specific bug.
It is almost certainly a GS bu
Ger Albrecht is a special case - I checked through so far about 2/3 of
the "missing" verses
A fair number are subsumed as expected, presumabvly dt different
versification scheme.
The rest though is missing indeed from the main text, but is then quoted
in the extensive foot notes of the module. It
Sebastien Koechlin wrote:
>
> When FreJND will be in beta, I don't know how I will be able to make
> corrections.
Is now in Beta
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 08:43:38PM +0100, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> a) having a raw text repository where the texts are kept in some import
> format (OSIS, ThML, whatever) under version control
> b) with named module owner(s) and contributor(s) -
> c) with some form of automated build mechanism whi
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Dm, please compare the list of the various German and French modules -
>
> The lists are identical between all these various modules (when taking
> into account that not all modules have all books)
>
> I am 99% sure that this is the result of KJV vs Luther versification,
>
Dm, please compare the list of the various German and French modules -
The lists are identical between all these various modules (when taking
into account that not all modules have all books)
I am 99% sure that this is the result of KJV vs Luther versification,
Peter
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> D
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:29 PM, Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> The last verse of many chapters is missing.
>> Malachi 4 is missing from many Bibles.
> I just checked out a printed French Bible:
> KJV scheme Malachi 4 is expressed as Malachi 3:19-24.
Do the beta testing tools state the number of vers
DM Smith wrote:
> I find some of the results surprising:
> The last verse of many chapters is missing.
> Malachi 4 is missing from many Bibles.
I just checked out a printed French Bible:
La Bible, Ancient et Nouveau Testament traduite de'l hebreu et du gree
en francais courant (Alliance Biblique
Jerold Haas wrote:
> Those in the list:
>
> I have been using Windows version of sword project for quite a
> while, and currently using v1.59. I have noticed what appears to be an
> XML parsing issue (Psalms 82:2) that appears to have inappropriately
> inserted raw XML in it. I'm using KJ
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Apologoies, I had not.
>
> I have now but the problem is not resolved in BD - not much at all is
> visible.
>
> Looks better in GS, but look e.g. at Luke 3
>
In GS only the first verse of matt 6 and of matt 7 are in red.
>
> Chris Little wrote:
>
>> did you update?
Apologoies, I had not.
I have now but the problem is not resolved in BD - not much at all is
visible.
Looks better in GS, but look e.g. at Luke 3
Chris Little wrote:
> did you update?
>
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> Also a problem in BD - Matth 5 and 6 are not appearing red, nor anything
>> in
I just downloaded the latest ABU.
The problem is that spans multiple verses. The
markup is correct OSIS. This will not work in any system that uses table
cells to display text in parallel, such as BibleTool. Or shows verses in
isolation, such as a search result, in any of our tools.
BD requir
did you update?
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Also a problem in BD - Matth 5 and 6 are not appearing red, nor anything
> in Acts 1
>
> Peter
>
> Peter von Kaehne wrote:
>> I have a problem in GS, not tried yet BibleCS.
>>
>> problems I found are also e.g. in Matt chapter 6 not red but for verse 1
>>
Also a problem in BD - Matth 5 and 6 are not appearing red, nor anything
in Acts 1
Peter
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> I have a problem in GS, not tried yet BibleCS.
>
> problems I found are also e.g. in Matt chapter 6 not red but for verse 1
>
> Also Acts 1 from verse 4 onwards the rest of teh cha
I didn't see any problems during a quick browse using BibleCS. Unless
you can provide a better indication of where precisely in the module the
problem is occurring, I'm going to suggest it's probably a GS-specific bug.
--Chris
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> yet another is Calvin's commentaries
>
>
DM Smith wrote:
>> Peter wrote:
>> a) having a raw text repository where the texts are kept in some import
>> format (OSIS, ThML, whatever) under version control
>>
> I think this needs to be the original text as we received it. Not the
> import format. We should keep complete records of when,
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> The way we work with software is
>
> 1) multiple independent projects
> 2) each project has one or several leads
> 3) there are other contributors with and without write access to the
> project repository
> 4) all projects are in some form of version control
> 5) Many proj
The newly committed code is very preliminary. The first milestone is
for frontends to need no changes to support these modules as "Biblical
Texts" using KJV versification. Obviously we have not hit this
milestone yet, but we've made steps toward it.
It SHOULD be the case that if you remove th
On Mon, Jun 16, 2008 at 3:09 PM, Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dm Smith wrote:
>
>> Chris, don't take it as criticism or a put down. I don't mean it
>> that way. I appreciate all your hard work and your contributions!
>
> Seconded, wholeheartedly.
Agreed!
It seems on my hearings
Dm Smith wrote:
> Chris, don't take it as criticism or a put down. I don't mean it
> that way. I appreciate all your hard work and your contributions!
Seconded, wholeheartedly.
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crossw
Eeli has written a list of things we should check - see on the wiki:
http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/Testing_of_new_modules
I have worked through most of this as far as it can be done in GS alone.
As now the structural part is done my suggestion is that you simply
check for actual display
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> The TurNTB has often verses grouped together, but this is not encoded
> ie.g. as v4-6 but instead v4 has all content and v5 and v6 are empty.
> So the list you showed for it is endless in consequence.
>
The wiki says that this module is known bad, so I'll assume that i
Am 16.06.2008 um 10:47 schrieb Peter von Kaehne:
> Practically all modules in beta are now tested for structural
> soundness,
> conf file consistency, declared features working, display in GS. The
> rest will be done this pm.
>
> Display in MacSword is out of my reach as I do not have a Mac.
I
The way we work with software is
1) multiple independent projects
2) each project has one or several leads
3) there are other contributors with and without write access to the
project repository
4) all projects are in some form of version control
5) Many projects have a development version and (in
The TurNTB has often verses grouped together, but this is not encoded
ie.g. as v4-6 but instead v4 has all content and v5 and v6 are empty.
So the list you showed for it is endless in consequence.
I would think this + alternative versification is the case in many other
Bibles.
Personally I would
For what it's worth, I've "scoped out" the Bibles in beta, comparing
them to the KJV versification. (I skipped the GenBook Bibles) I wrote a
little program using JSword to do the work. Hopefully, I didn't make a
mistake in writing it. (I've spot checked it against GnomeSword.)
Below are the res
Another site that has the Russian Synodal Bible available (now in its Fifth
Edition),
http://www.bibles.org.uk/ http://www.bibles.org.uk/
It can be downloaded as a PDF file.
As can also the Bulgarian Bible based on 1940 edition, revised by
Bibliata.com
There are also several "printed to deman
yet another is Calvin's commentaries
Loops in OT, leaving NT inaccessible and when from start in NT OT is
inaccessible - but the drop down works in NT
Peter
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Another module with the same problem is GerTExtBibel
>
> I have reported the same matter on Gnomsword's developm
I just had a chance to look at it - this is brilliant and does what I
need. Thanks a lot!
Peter
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Peter, I don't know if stats from my repo are important to you, but I
> just put up a short script to run at 12:01am every day to generate a
> simple listing of month-to-date
Another module with the same problem is GerTExtBibel
I have reported the same matter on Gnomsword's development list.
Peter von Kaehne wrote:
> Both modules trigger odd behaviour in GS
>
> 1) contrary to other "partial" books it is possible to rotate through
> the book - ending on last you move
That is wonderful Karl! I wil look at it later tonight in detail. I do
not need accurate numbers.
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Peter, I don't know if stats from my repo are important to you, but I
> just put up a short script to run at 12:01am every day to generate a
> simple listing of month-to-date
Peter, I don't know if stats from my repo are important to you, but I
just put up a short script to run at 12:01am every day to generate a
simple listing of month-to-date activity in /pub/sword/usage. You can
get these dumps and then e.g. "grep /far 2008.06" and similar.
It makes no attempt to di
Indeed, any of the new VerseKey modules cause a crash in GnomeSword.
Per-chapter display begins by accessing the last verse of the previous
chapter: Verse selected in SWModule *mod using (*mod)--, text then
obtained from *mod.
#0 0x0811dc89 in sword::SWBuf::set (this=0xb900800, [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Practically all modules in beta are now tested for structural soundness,
conf file consistency, declared features working, display in GS. The
rest will be done this pm.
Display in MacSword is out of my reach as I do not have a Mac.
Display in BibleCS -if someone could do this on an existing insta
jonathon wrote:
> All:
>
> Browsing Sourceforge, I found the following projects:
>
> * SwordModuleCreator
Last release 4/06 - no CVS activity since 2005
> * jianzidian
Was a project to create a dictionary.
> * Dreambeam
Appears active - recent uploads and active website with recent additions
50 matches
Mail list logo
