Yes. Hallelujah.
Nathan set up WordPress and we've updated the content.
Manfred
Am 09.06.2008 um 05:03 schrieb DM Smith:
> I just went to macsword.com and saw that it is current! And I wanted
> to say: Hallelujah!
>
> Great job!
>
> In Him,
> DM
>
>
> __
Shame on me for not knowing GS better (I've just never been a fan of
Gnome's look). I really like the advanced search dialog (I never knew
it was there!), though a "search all modules" or something like that
would be nice to save time. Or perhaps in the custom list creation
dialog a button that
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:57 PM, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>
>> OT: have you
>> ever wanted to find a verse, but been unable to find the right words
>> to type for the particular version you are using - having synonym
>> suggestion u
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:50 PM, DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Jun 8, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
>
>> applications should
>> allow searching more than one commentary/genbook at the same time
>
> Good idea.
>
> In the wiki, we are trying to put together a "Features List"
I just went to macsword.com and saw that it is current! And I wanted
to say: Hallelujah!
Great job!
In Him,
DM
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsu
The idea of being able to search not only text but also keys and
cross-references is exciting. That way if you are searching for "faith"
you don't get thousands of hits that aren't so useful but you can focus
on hits that are speaking directly to the issue of faith rather than
just making an in
On Jun 8, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> OT: have you
> ever wanted to find a verse, but been unable to find the right words
> to type for the particular version you are using - having synonym
> suggestion using something like wordnet is another thing that might be
> worth looking at
On Jun 8, 2008, at 10:27 PM, Jonathan Morgan wrote:
> applications should
> allow searching more than one commentary/genbook at the same time
Good idea.
In the wiki, we are trying to put together a "Features List" for the
ideal application: http://www.crosswire.org/wiki/index.php/Frontends:Fe
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 12:32 PM, Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jonathan Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> have you ever wanted to find a verse, but been unable to find the
>> right words to type for the particular version you are using
>
> :-)
>
> In GS, I use a custom module l
"Jonathan Morgan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> have you ever wanted to find a verse, but been unable to find the
> right words to type for the particular version you are using
:-)
In GS, I use a custom module list I call "Good Translations" in which I
have included all the English modules I've g
Daniel Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> the wrong notice would only look ridiculous to the
> kind of people who would make use of this.
The one-sentence addition to About is a minor yet accurate summary.
> Regarding the question of breaking up the module, if there aren't
> major performance pr
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 11:46 AM, Daniel Owens <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't personally have a strong opinion about identifying the EarlyFathers
> Genbook as containing heretical material, though I think Eeli is right that
> the wrong notice would only look ridiculous to the kind of people wh
On Jun 8, 2008, at 9:46 PM, Daniel Owens wrote:
> That brings me to another issue: the ability to search genbooks and
> commentaries. I have a vague memory of comments on this forum to the
> effect that such a feature isn't necessary or desireable, but the
> Father's module is a prime examp
I don't personally have a strong opinion about identifying the
EarlyFathers Genbook as containing heretical material, though I think
Eeli is right that the wrong notice would only look ridiculous to the
kind of people who would make use of this.
Regarding the question of breaking up the modul
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> "Brian J. Dumont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> I'd strongly be in favor of a notice in the About section that this
>> module contains a wide swath of texts of interest to Biblical scholars,
>> including documents that have historically and currently are considered
>>
David,
I received your CD artwork. Thank you so much for this work! I must
have wasted half a day last week trying to throw something together and
failed every turn I took. I should have known to ask for help before
attempting anything aesthetic. Your unique skills are greatly
appreciated.
On Jun 8, 2008, at 3:30 PM, Brian J. Dumont wrote:
>
>> If this is one huge module it's not a big problem because casual
>> readers
>> will avoid it and people can see what it is. It's also easy to add a
>> notice in the About section. However, if the module is chopped in
>> pieces
>> it's ha
Following a request on Sword support for the Dios Habla Hoy I just now
had a look at the Spanish Bibles we do have and found that the SpaVNT
has some serious problems.
Not sure how to describe it, but a sample text may show the problem Mat
1:2. This is across all books.
Como est\'e1 escrito en Is
"Brian J. Dumont" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'd strongly be in favor of a notice in the About section that this
> module contains a wide swath of texts of interest to Biblical scholars,
> including documents that have historically and currently are considered
> heretical as well as documents wh
> If this is one huge module it's not a big problem because casual readers
> will avoid it and people can see what it is. It's also easy to add a
> notice in the About section. However, if the module is chopped in pieces
> it's harder to say whether some module is part of this compilation or a
> r
On Sun, 8 Jun 2008, Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Note a couple BT glitches:
> - Attempting to apply a bigger point size to the use of Padauk font, it
> had no effect until I quit and restarted BT.
I will look at this if I remember later, but it might be changed anyways
(or it may have been changed a
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I don't see any reason that it needs to be highly accurate. The
> nearest K or even 100K should be sufficient. That is a minor change to
> the module would not warrant re-computation.
- There's no reason not to calculate it precisely, considering that any
scr
>> - Attempting to apply a bigger point size to the use of Padauk font, it
>> had no effect until I quit and restarted BT.
Martin Gruner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hmm, which version do you use? It works at least in SVN which will be
> released as 1.7 soon.
1.6.5.1, as handed to me by yum a
On Sun, Jun 8, 2008 at 1:52 AM, Brian J. Dumont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We should really be careful here. These volumes seem to contain both
> orthodox and non-orthodox documents; including a number of heretical
> texts: see in particular volume 8. I haven't delved into these texts,
> but a
Hi Karl,
> Note a couple BT glitches:
> - Attempting to apply a bigger point size to the use of Padauk font, it
> had no effect until I quit and restarted BT.
Hmm, which version do you use? It works at least in SVN which will be released
as 1.7 soon.
> - BT has no full-name language listings
Karl Kleinpaste wrote:
> Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> The suggested best course of action for today is to use the Eclipse SWT
>> framework since it will use pango on linux & uniscribe on windows.
>
> GS already uses pango, and has the same mistakes (relative to WorldPad)
> as see
On Jun 8, 2008, at 11:08 AM, Chris Little wrote:
Regarding the possibility of complex script rendering in BD, there
was a
brief discussion of complex scripts in Java on graphite-devel a week
ago:
http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/forum.php?thread_name=OF488F087E.E5E55533-ON86257456.004F079E-
Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The suggested best course of action for today is to use the Eclipse SWT
> framework since it will use pango on linux & uniscribe on windows.
GS already uses pango, and has the same mistakes (relative to WorldPad)
as seen in BT and Windows. Notably, ther
Burmese/Myanmar has been in Unicode since 3.0, but it got a major
overhaul in version 5.1, which just came out a couple months ago. (And
apparently there are still felt to be some shortcomings in the new
encoding model.)
The Burmese Bible we have most likely uses the Unicode 3.0 model, while
f
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> To a large degree,
> the ability to think critically is missing in today's church.
Apropos of this, I'd like to put in a plug for The Theology Program,
about which you can learn at http://reclaimingthemind.org. I've taken
the 1st 3 (of 9) courses onsite as
Eeli Kaikkonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Having some reference images in Internet would be nice, I would like to
> see how this shows up in BibleTime and how it should be.
Also:
http://karl.kleinpaste.org/.../BurJudson-BT.png
Note a couple BT glitches:
- Attempting to apply a bigger point siz
Peter von Kaehne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I have just now installed BurJudson and the SIL Padauk Myanmar font.
> There are significant graphical differences between Gnomesword and
> Bibledesktop, when comparing Gen 1:1-2. The differences appear to be
> mostly with some composite characters.
T
On Jun 7, 2008, at 9:52 PM, Brian J. Dumont wrote:
> We should really be careful here. These volumes seem to contain both
> orthodox and non-orthodox documents; including a number of heretical
> texts: see in particular volume 8. I haven't delved into these texts,
> but a number of them are cer
I attach a screenshot
The differences I found in Gen1:1 are
1A vs 1B - BD appears to have two characters in sequence while GS has
split the second character and made it "embrace" the first one.
2A vs 2B(a) At the centre of the word appears a character a little bit
like a handwritten latinate sma
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008, Brian J. Dumont wrote:
> We should really be careful here. These volumes seem to contain both
> orthodox and non-orthodox documents; including a number of heretical
> texts: see in particular volume 8. I haven't delved into these texts,
> but a number of them are certainly qu
Brian J. Dumont wrote:
> We should really be careful here. These volumes seem to contain both
> orthodox and non-orthodox documents; including a number of heretical
> texts: see in particular volume 8.
Some of the texts are more than doubtful - all that pseudoepigraphic
fake NT stuff in Vol 8 is
36 matches
Mail list logo
