Hello;
Due to some of those things in life that sometimes happen I reconverted
strongly to Catholicism and I want to join my devotions with my favorite OS
(FreeBSD).. so voila.. I'm here playing with sword.
I have some pretty cool documents.. starting with the new Catechism of the
Catholic Church
On Jan 26, 2008 6:19 PM, Jason Galyon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Titus 3:10-11
>
Eh? What exactly is your point here? Trying to warn yourself about
your own behavior?
I may not speak for the rest of the people on the list, but my feeling
about the GPL are as follows:
When I put time or ener
Chris,
I appreciate you helping to clear some confusion here since I think
that I helped with some of nudging. This is great news, since all Greek
modules will have a common morph reference. I think covering all the
combinations in the known works would be adequate since most of the
works are n
On Jan 26, 2008, at 8:42 PM, Chris Little wrote:
>
> On Jan 26, 2008, at 4:57 PM, DM Smith wrote:
>
>> Perhaps I'm a bit dense, I don't see how the module would grow from
>> 150K to 2000K. Can we do key linking? And that if it would be encoded
>> into the engine that the size increase would be sm
On Jan 26, 2008, at 4:57 PM, DM Smith wrote:
> Perhaps I'm a bit dense, I don't see how the module would grow from
> 150K to 2000K. Can we do key linking? And that if it would be encoded
> into the engine that the size increase would be small.
>
> As to adding parsing/normalization to JSword, we
Perhaps I'm a bit dense, I don't see how the module would grow from
150K to 2000K. Can we do key linking? And that if it would be encoded
into the engine that the size increase would be small.
As to adding parsing/normalization to JSword, we already do that wrt
Strong's numbers and also Devo
Titus 3:10-11
Chris Little wrote:
> [Forwarding message per request. Sorry, I can't advise how to fix the
> sending problem. --Chris]
>
> Begin forwarded message:
>
>
>> From: Moses McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Date: January 26, 2008 3:59:22 PM PST
>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> Subject: Re:
[Forwarding message per request. Sorry, I can't advise how to fix the
sending problem. --Chris]
Begin forwarded message:
> From: Moses McKnight <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: January 26, 2008 3:59:22 PM PST
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [sword-devel] GPL and other license related question
We gave a new Greek morphology in the pipeline to replace virtually
all of our existing morphologies, and I would be interested to hear
people's opinions or concerns, considering it does represent a certain
amount of change from the current system.
Presently we have 3 morphologies in use:
1)
On Jan 26, 2008, at 5:57 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
> DM Smith wrote:
>> On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>>
>>
>>> am I forced to
>>> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the
>>> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app?
>>>
>>
>> On
DM Smith wrote:
> On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> am I forced to
>> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the
>> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app?
>>
>
> Only the server for the reason you stated. This is a fun
On Jan 26, 2008, at 2:12 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
> am I forced to
> use GPL for both the server and the client or would this just be the
> server since it interfaces directly with a sword based lib/app?
Only the server for the reason you stated. This is a fundamental
loophole/flaw in the GPL.
On Jan 26, 2008, at 11:10 AM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
> This is full of angst and ignorance. I would expect that of a child
> but
> not a Christian. If you can not develop a frontend (for example) in
> whatever OSI approved license you choose then I believe that is one of
> the many reasons why
Thank you for being a voice of reason and self control.
There are valid issues for the protecting of work and the desire to
allow for wide dissemination that get burried under pagan trivia and
self serving agendas and rage.
My concern is that the portions I write not be viral. I am not really
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> On Fri, 25 Jan 2008, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has already
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>>
>> Some believe the GPL to be restrictive and
Chris Little wrote:
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
>> already
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>>
>
> Sword and all works based
On Jan 26, 2008, at 8:53 AM, DM Smith wrote:
> The upshot is that it may not be possible
> to use Sword with any other third party code that is open source.
This is worded badly. I only mean to point out that there are some
licenses that are not compatible and third party code licensed under
On Jan 26, 2008, at 3:12 AM, Chris Little wrote:
>
> On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
>
>> On that subject
>>
>> Free as in Freedom
>>
>> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
>> already
>> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
>
> Sword and
On Jan 25, 2008, at 8:52 PM, Jason Galyon wrote:
> On that subject
>
> Free as in Freedom
>
> Is Sword available under a dual license btw? This probably has
> already
> been answered but I am failing to find it currently.
Sword and all works based on it, including all frontends, are licensed
19 matches
Mail list logo
