Hi Troy,
I did not subscribe to the sword-support. I just start receiving mails from
it since last month. But it is ok. Now I know what is gonig on. It helps.
Thanks.
Wilson
-Original Message-
From: Troy A. Griffitts [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: October 29, 2007 4:17 PM
To: SWORD Deve
Chris Little wrote:
> DM Smith wrote:
>
>> On Oct 29, 2007, at 12:49 AM, Chris Little wrote:
>>
>>> It's possible to have multiple keys share a single entry. So
>>> pointed and
>>> an unpointed keys can point to the same entry. We've done this
>>> experimentally with dictionaries in the p
Dear Wilson,
It seems that you may have recently subscribed to sword-support. This
mailing list allows open posting, so does get quite a bit a spam. We
have filters on the list but it does not catch all junk. Hope this is
helpful.
-Troy A. Griffitts
Wilson.li wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I
This sounds fine to me. I've added Bible, Commentary, Lexicon, and Other
category values to Wiki. They should take default values when no
explicit Category is named, so I've added a task item to the bugtracker
regarding the addition of defaulting code to the library.
--Chris
Eeli Kaikkonen wr
peter wrote:
> A useful change in the main library would be to allow composite modules
> which have one bulky resource (e.g. an image directory) and multiple
> access indeces and subsequently are subject to several technical
> categories. Once this becomes possible and more widespread we should
>
DM Smith wrote:
> On Oct 29, 2007, at 12:49 AM, Chris Little wrote:
>> It's possible to have multiple keys share a single entry. So
>> pointed and
>> an unpointed keys can point to the same entry. We've done this
>> experimentally with dictionaries in the past to permit lookup by a
>> Strong's
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, peter wrote:
> I think the technical capabilities of the various module forms are so
> vastly different and strictly separated, while the front ends at the
> moment so closely tied in their GUI layout to these capabilities, that
> it makes very little sense to create and prese
Hello,
I am not sure if it happens only to me to other people. Recently, after the
[EMAIL PROTECTED]" setup, I keep receiving junk mails sending
from that address. For the last couple days, I also received mail with
virus attached to it. So I need to report this. I am sorry if it is only
happe
I think the technical capabilities of the various module forms are so
vastly different and strictly separated, while the front ends at the
moment so closely tied in their GUI layout to these capabilities, that
it makes very little sense to create and present at this stage semantic
categories.
Havi
I have entered this into our "bugs" database: http://
www.crosswire.org/bugs/browse/API-91
Serving Him Together,
DM
On Oct 29, 2007, at 1:00 AM, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Yes, everyone is correct that the .next() method on a Lexicon/
> Dictionary
> module will show the next value in t
On Oct 29, 2007, at 12:49 AM, Chris Little wrote:
> DM Smith wrote:
>> I'm not sure if I am reading the Sword code correctly, but it appears
>> that it is sorting at a byte level and not a character level. That
>> isn't by code points.
>
> I'm pretty sure you're right about what Sword is actually
On Mon, 29 Oct 2007, Martin Gruner wrote:
> HI Eeli,
>
> IMO we should hide the technical detail from the users. For them, only the
> "logical" function is interesting.
Of course, though actually our frontend needs also the technical
distinction: we have to offer the list of the works to add to
DM Smith wrote:
> I'm not sure if I am reading the Sword code correctly, but it appears
> that it is sorting at a byte level and not a character level. That
> isn't by code points.
>
> I think that we discussed this a little bit ago and concluded that
> some work needs to be done in the engin
13 matches
Mail list logo
