This sounds fine to me. I've added Bible, Commentary, Lexicon, and Other 
category values to Wiki. They should take default values when no 
explicit Category is named, so I've added a task item to the bugtracker 
regarding the addition of defaulting code to the library.

--Chris


Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> Looking at both wiki .conf section and BibleTime code I noticed that
> there is no strict logic in module categories. Several cases are
> possible now, for example:
> 
> - technically a genbook, logically a Bible (though there are none atm.?)
> - technically a genbook, logically a commentary (there are none?)
> - technically a lexicon, logically a devotional
> - technically a lexicon, logically an atlas (NETmaps)
> - technically a genbook, logically an atlas
> - technically a genbook, logically a lexicon (Hesychius)
> 
> But it's not possible to know all logical types or categories by just
> looking at the conf file.
> 
> Would it be reasonable to add all the logical alternatives in
> "Category"? Then it would include Commentaries, Bibles and Lexicons as
> well. The frontend could then decide whether to show for example all
> logical lexicons together or divide them in technical basis.
> 
>   Yours,
>       Eeli Kaikkonen (Mr.), Oulu, Finland
>       e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (with no x)
> 
> _______________________________________________
> sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
> http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
> Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

_______________________________________________
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
Instructions to unsubscribe/change your settings at above page

Reply via email to