DM,
Thank you so much, that is helpful to know what is already available. I
will go to the links you mentioned and once I have a better idea of how
things work maybe I can help you develop those documents.
Daniel
DM Smith wrote:
Daniel,
Sorry for not replying sooner. For an example o
Then it won't hurt to make it current :) It would be easy to test, too.
My Linux builds use -lz to pull zlib in.
I would guess that Borland makes it available for linking, too.
I wonder if that would be an option with minizip. Both from a Linux
perspective and a Borland one.
-- DM
On Sep 20,
DM,
I justed wanted to say THANKS again for all the manual work you put into
updating the KJV2003 project. Just looked at your status page in the link
below and was overcome with gratitude.
-Troy.
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Daniel,
>
>Sorry for not replying sooner. For an example
Daniel,
Sorry for not replying sooner. For an example of OSIS that works well
for Sword look at www.crosswire.org/~dmsmith/kjv2006. At the bottom
of the page is a link OSIS XML to the KJV in OSIS.
Additionally, you can use BibleDesktop's View Source to look at other
OSIS modules.
Yes we
OK, I'm wrong a little.
We compile one file: untgz.c
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Found out a bit more:
>>Sword uses a 2002 copy of zlib. It has been updated since then with
>>bug, security and performance fixes.
>
>Thanks for all the i
ldd lookup
Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> 2 libsword.so files?
>
>I thought of that.
>
>[1125] [10:50 PM] awol:gnomesword
>> ldd /usr/bin/gnomesword2 | grep sword
>libsword-1.5.9.so => /usr/lib/libsword-1.5.9.so (0x00111000
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Found out a bit more:
>Sword uses a 2002 copy of zlib. It has been updated since then with
>bug, security and performance fixes.
Thanks for all the investigation DM!
Just to clarify: From memory, I don't believe the SWORD engine actually
uses the copy of z
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2 libsword.so files?
I thought of that.
[1125] [10:50 PM] awol:gnomesword
> ldd /usr/bin/gnomesword2 | grep sword
libsword-1.5.9.so => /usr/lib/libsword-1.5.9.so (0x00111000)
[1126] [10:51 PM] awol:gnomesword
> ls -l /usr/lib/libsword*
-rw
2 libsword.so files?
I always build with sword statically during development/debugging.
Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> But I was under the impression that FMT_HTMLHREF was your filter set. ?
>
>Yes, it is, as can be seen by the HTM
Found out a bit more:
Sword uses a 2002 copy of zlib. It has been updated since then with
bug, security and performance fixes.
On Sep 20, 2007, at 10:02 PM, DM Smith wrote:
More results of exploration:
At zlib.net, the home of the zlib code, there is a faq question
regarding zip archives
Sorry for the late delay in my response--we had some medical challenges
in our family necessitating an evacuation, so I am now away from my
desktop and using my wife's laptop, which only has Windows installed.
I like the idea that OSIS tagging, if it is legal, should work. I will
go back and
More results of exploration:
At zlib.net, the home of the zlib code, there is a faq question
regarding zip archives with a recommended solution:
11. Can zlib handle .zip archives?
Not by itself, no. See the directory contrib/minizip in
the zlib distribution.
Minizip is what
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> But I was under the impression that FMT_HTMLHREF was your filter set. ?
Yes, it is, as can be seen by the HTML content of the Render Entry.
That's why I don't understand the fact that the module output obtained
by GS' display routine lacks the upca
Robin wrote:
> In Search Window (Sword), Power Search (Bible Tool), "Search:" (Bible
> Desktop) and other "Search" functions, In the results HIGHLIGHT, COLOR
> or BOLDEN the token, word or phrase searched for.
GnomeSword's sidebar search marks search terms bold+purple in the previewer.
__
Troy wrote:
> >> Crack of the whip...
> Yes, of course I know you well enough to know it was meant in good-nature.
And I read it as meaning: "This bug is going to be fixed today. No
If's, and's, or buts."
xan
jonathon
___
sword-devel mailing list: sw
Karl Kleinpaste <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Crack of the whip...
>
>:-)
Yes, of course I know you well enough to know it was meant in good-nature.
>... so I am assuming we've got an
>OSIS-to-HTML glitch (again), because what gets to GnomeSword'
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Crack of the whip...
:-)
I do hope you realize it's intended good-naturedly. We're all putting
in time to get a lot of features and bug fixes covered. I'm hoping to
see you comfortable unleashing the official 1.5.10 sometime Real Soon
Now, becau
Troy,
I studied the untargz code and all the other code in the zlib
directory. It does not apply to zip files. A zipfile has a table of
contents and the zlib code does not read it. An entry in the TOC will
have the location of the file and it's size in the zipfile and how it
is stor
>Success. Many thanx.
>
>Now, about that toupper() problem with ...
Crack of the whip...
OK, I'm tired of reading the bugtrack on this one. Could you email 1 verse,
your sword configurations (only the deviations from current svn usrinst.sh,
e.g. witout ICU), the output of sword/examples/cmdline
"Troy A. Griffitts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Success. Many thanx.
Now, about that toupper() problem with ...
___
sword-devel mailing list: sword-devel@crosswire.org
http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/lis
There is already code to unpack the mods.d.tar.gz file. I believe the code
we used for that came from the zlib project. It may be similar to what you
need to do for a zip file. I can't remember offhand.
DM Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I'm looking into adding to installmgr the download of
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, DM Smith wrote:
> number. Alas, some people are so trained to the actual number itself
> that they will want to continue to see it.
Well, in prisons people may be called by serial numbers and if they are
trained to that, who am I to argue? :)
Anyways, I am excited to see how
Hi,
works for me now.
Thanks! Good work!
Joachim
> Ok guys. I have a theory and a fix for the current installmgr bug. I have
> high confidence in what I've checked in, so if I can convince anyone who
> has had problems to try again, your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks for your
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
> Ok guys. I have a theory and a fix for the current installmgr bug. I have
> high confidence in what I've checked in, so if I can convince anyone who has
> had problems to try again, your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
> Thanks for your time and my apologies it
I'm looking into adding to installmgr the download of a cached zipped
module, if present at the download site. Otherwise the code will work as
before.
I've run into an obstacle: zlib cannot read the "table of contents" in a
zipfile. I'm looking for a portable way to do the unzip. Any suggestion
Ok guys. I have a theory and a fix for the current installmgr bug. I have
high confidence in what I've checked in, so if I can convince anyone who has
had problems to try again, your feedback would be greatly appreciated.
Thanks for your time and my apologies it has taken so long to hunt this on
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Matt Reimer wrote:
>
>> I agree. IMHO Strong's numbers are an implementation detail that
>> should remain hidden if at all possible.
>>
>
> It is a fossil from the age when there were no computers, only books.
> The reason for it's existence is t
On Thu, 20 Sep 2007, Matt Reimer wrote:
> I agree. IMHO Strong's numbers are an implementation detail that
> should remain hidden if at all possible.
It is a fossil from the age when there were no computers, only books.
The reason for it's existence is that many people could not find a word
from t
On 9/19/07, Troy A. Griffitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >FYI, GnomeSword behaves as DM expects: The right-click popup menus offer
> >module options that are module-specific, and those settings are remembered
> >in a separate configuration, modops.conf.
> >
> >This is the right way to go. The
On 9/19/07, Troy A. Griffitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> OT: There was a thread about LXXM processing. I have a script that I
> >> believe slurps down LXXM from CCAT and generates a nice GenBook module
> >> doing all necessary conversion of whatever, and includes lemma which can
> >
> >> be l
With Robin's permission I am posting this to sword-devel. This is
top-posted so start at the bottom.
On Sep 20, 2007 at 1:33 AM, Robin wrote:
DM,
Thanks for the quick response. Please post it. Even if it only worked
for simple searches (word or phrase) it would be worth it. (I'm always
say
On Wed, 19 Sep 2007, Chris Little wrote:
> I wish we could display keys in non-touppered form. Capitals are so
> ugly, especially outside of basic modern western European languages.
Agreed. And think about for example Liddell/Scott, at least the Abridged
version, where only root forms are in capit
32 matches
Mail list logo
