Re: [sword-devel] -- Spam --Re: NET bible and Sword .........

2007-01-17 Thread jhphx
Chris Little wrote: > This list, sword-devel, only permits subscribers to post, but it doesn't > have any spam problems. > No spam but because of the lists from the same domain that do, it gets marked as spam, bounced, or stuck in some web trashcan, at least by cox.net. Jerry __

Re: [sword-devel] NET bible and Sword .........

2007-01-17 Thread Chris Little
Unfortunately, we're talking about the sword-support list. Any email to any of the support email addresses gets forwarded to this list, where volunteers hopefully provide answers. Most mail comes from users needing help, who shouldn't even need to know that a mailing list is involved. This list

Re: [sword-devel] SWORD WINDOWS SOURCE FILE

2007-01-17 Thread DJ Ortley
I was looking at that scratching my head a bit when I downloaded the API. Shouldn't the generic api source be categorized somewhere else instead of under 'Linux'...like a 'source' or '*nix' category on its own? I understood what it meant when I got it, but its took me a while to figure it out.

Re: [sword-devel] NET bible and Sword .........

2007-01-17 Thread Wade Maxfield
Hi Troy, I am a subscriber, and I also started http://www.maildeflector.netseveral years ago using custom code. It is an RBL. If this list is a subscriber only post list, then you can use maildeflector to block all ip addresses except those ip addresses that have subscribed through judiciou

Re: [sword-devel] Fowarding support emails (was: Re: Bible Desktop and NET Bible (RE: [sword-support] Error?))

2007-01-17 Thread Daniel Glassey
On 17/01/07, ingo7 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi everyone, > > 'private' means that it is not public, and AFAIK all responses/ mails on > this list ARE public. _This_ list sword-devel is public. Sword-support is private. So I'll just repeat what Chris said. Please don't forward private mail o

Re: [sword-devel] -- Spam -- NET bible and Sword .........

2007-01-17 Thread jhphx
Barry Drake wrote: > ...Sword support list as it was generating so much spam that > my ISP started bouncing messages ... I also had that problem and also that cox.net was for over six months dumping this list into a web junk folder. I almost never check web mail so it was deleted automatically

Re: [sword-devel] NET bible and Sword .........

2007-01-17 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
Hi Barry, I have added spam filters to sword-support recently. It is much better but will still generate about 5 spam messages a day. I concur with Chris about forwarding email to sword-devel. We have had many complaints from people who have found their support emails archived on public f

[sword-devel] NET bible and Sword .........

2007-01-17 Thread Barry Drake
Hi there . As the 'culprit' that was forwarded to this list much to the dismay of Chris was a query about the NET bible and Sword, could I say that if anyone spots a problem on the Sword support list that is down to one of the NET bible modules, they can feel free to forward it to me.

Re: [sword-devel] Fowarding support emails (was: Re: Bible Desktop and NET Bible (RE: [sword-support] Error?))

2007-01-17 Thread ingo7
-Original Message- From: ingo7 [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2007 9:56 PM To: 'SWORD Developers' Collaboration Forum' Subject: RE: [sword-devel] Fowarding support emails (was: Re: Bible Desktop and NET Bible (RE: [sword-support] Error?)) Hi everyone, 'private'

[sword-devel] Strongs tags link

2007-01-17 Thread Richard Parsons
Hello everyone, I'm still working on a .NET client for the Sword Project and I have got verses pulling up using a markup of fmt_htmlhref and an encoding of enc_html. I'm now trying to get a handle on the Strong's numbers, morph tags, and footnotes. Currently when I turn any of the tags on they sh

Re: [sword-devel] [sword-support] Letter from Macedonia

2007-01-17 Thread Maurits Obbink
Angela, not that I'm aware of but you could ask the Macedonian bible society. http://www.unet.com.mk/mbc/biblija.htm the whole Bible was completed in 1988. NT 1967-1976. Bible portions 1952-1959 I'm not aware of a digital version. Regards, Maurits Obbink. Angela Zaev wrote: > Is there an avail

Re: [sword-devel] Bible Desktop and NET Bible (RE: [sword-support] Error?)

2007-01-17 Thread Barry Drake
Hi there ... Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: > I'm afraid that Net Bible has some features > which Bible Desktop cannot handle, but I'm not sure. No: Bible Desktop handles all the NET modules perfectly. Either the questioner has not installed the module properly, or he has downloaded the 'for

[sword-devel] Fowarding support emails (was: Re: Bible Desktop and NET Bible (RE: [sword-support] Error?))

2007-01-17 Thread Chris Little
Eeli Kaikkonen wrote: > I'll send this message to sword-devel list where Bible Desktop > developers may see it. Maybe they can help. Please remember that the sword-support list is a private list. People emailing for support do not expect that their emails will be sent to public archived lists

[sword-devel] Bible Desktop and NET Bible (RE: [sword-support] Error?)

2007-01-17 Thread Eeli Kaikkonen
On Tue, 16 Jan 2007, Steve Williams wrote: > Thank you for your reply, sorry to take so long to get back to you; I am > simply trying to use the Net-Bible premium for Windows, Bible-Desk-Top > version 1.0.5. When I try to open up a scripture the error comes up. All of > the other Bible versions wo