> SWORD_PATH is out of scope for this installer. Our windows
installer
> has always looked by default in the current directory for mods.d
I'm not sure what you mean by this. Don't take SWORD_PATH into account
regardless of whether it is defined or not?
My impression is that the SwMgr (and associ
Just thought I'd ask how the progress is coming along with this GBF to
OSIS converter. And to inquire about how much longer it might be until
we see new modules that were generated using this converter.
(specifically the WEB and HNV modules.)
Ryan
On 9/14/05, Chris Little <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wro
Chris Little wrote:
DM Smith wrote:
I am then wondering why Naves is online. According to nave.doc
that is part of the module, it taken from a particularly buggy etext
and was fixed to be 99% correct. As I have obtained the original of
the fixed etext and am working on converting it into
Lynn,
I would love for you to do this work if you have the time. Your
suggestions are helpful. I have a few brief comments:
SWORD_PATH is out of scope for this installer. Our windows installer
has always looked by default in the current directory for mods.d
Simply, I think all w
DM Smith wrote:
Chris,
This is good to know. While it is a very old work, I think that if or
when one proceeds with the effort, it should be necessary to work from
something that clearly is not copyrighted (i.e. hard copy that is
sufficiently early enough) or we get permission from the cu
Chris,
This is good to know. While it is a very old work, I think that if
or when one proceeds with the effort, it should be necessary to work
from something that clearly is not copyrighted (i.e. hard copy that is
sufficiently early enough) or we get permission from the current
copyright ho
Jerry wrote:
Dickinson
Smith wrote:
...
Likewise.
If an individual or
group had legally obtained them, they became a
"reliance party".
I am not sure what you intended with that statement. As I understand
it, "reliance party" has to do with making and distributing
Dickinson Smith wrote:
...
Likewise.
If an individual or
group had legally obtained them, they became a
"reliance party".
I am not sure what you intended with that statement. As I understand it,
"reliance party" has to do with making and distributing new copies.
Under the right condition
Subject: Re: [sword-devel] BibleCS Installer
Troy,
I expect that all the "real" bugs from 1.5.6 have been fixed in the 1.5.8
engine. At this point I do not have the time to get Eclipse and build the
latest BibleCS and install it over 1.5.6. I just wish to download
and install BibleCS 1.5.
We were told that the BDB & Thayer modules we had were derived from OLB
content and that they had added content beyond the plain BDB/Thayer
text. It's not an issue of the basic BDB/Thayer content being under
copyright. Those are very old and very public domain. It's the
additional material. And
Not really. The copyright laws changed duration from
something like 17 years to something like 75 years.
When this happened there was a lot of material that
was older than 17 years but less than 75 (or whatever
the durations actually were). If an individual or
group had legally obtained them, they
11 matches
Mail list logo
