Re: [sword-devel] [Fwd: ICU - RE: Borland C++ Builder Port]

2003-12-17 Thread Chris Little
Yeah, ICU on BCB5/6 has been pretty trivial for a while now. We've still got 2.6 in CVS. --Chris Daniel Glassey wrote: For whoever is interested in the latest version of ICU for BibleCS if it hasn't been done already. Regards, Daniel -Forwarded Message- From: Omar CastaÃeda Acosta To:

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.7 OPPORTUNITy

2003-12-17 Thread David Overcash
I've been trying to do this (playing with source, rather, trying to understand source) for the past month. Granted, I have been too busy with work to really look at it, but I got lost... I never really saw where to start working on it.. :-/ If someone does pick this project up, please send me c

[sword-devel] [Fwd: ICU - RE: Borland C++ Builder Port]

2003-12-17 Thread Daniel Glassey
For whoever is interested in the latest version of ICU for BibleCS if it hasn't been done already. Regards, Daniel -Forwarded Message- > From: Omar CastaÃeda Acosta > To: Marc Wilhelm KÃster > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: Borland C++ Builder Port > Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:50:34

Re: [sword-devel] 1.5.7 OPPORTUNITy

2003-12-17 Thread Troy A. Griffitts
There's one project on there that would be good for someone that wants to get involved to try. http://www.crosswire.org/ucgi-bin/twiki/view/Main/TroyAGriffittsTodo It's the issue with adding recursive directory downloads to the installmgr functions: sword/src/mgr/installmgr.cpp The routines c

[sword-devel] LcdBible and BerBible recruitment [was Bereans and Sword ... uncle]

2003-12-17 Thread Lynn Allan
[sword-devel] Bereans and Sword and GPL vs PD>> IANAL either, but... Hi Fred, Thanks for your very helpful feedback. Not only was it very informative about GPL issues, but I consider it a great example of a gentle, wise Biblical rebuke, including those things said, and those thing not said. And

RE: [sword-devel] KJV2003 Project -GREEK TAGGERS

2003-12-17 Thread R.J.C. van Haaften
I wrote: 1722 (en; note: NOT h-en) and 1520 (h-eis; nom/acc sing. neut. of h-eis)This should be, of course: 1722 (en; note: NOT h-en) and 1520 (h-eis; nom/acc sing. neut. is h-en)