At 04:18 PM 9/17/2003 -0700, Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
So, please suggest!
On the page, powersearch.jsp, where it says:
Power Search
Module to search:
ยป World English Bible (WEB)
The word "Module" is not going to be understood by a lot of
people. Maybe something like:
Power Search
Click on a
Possibly make more of a contrasting color scheme.
The top menus are a muted blue on a blue background.
I agree. It would be good if those menu items acted as tabs and the tab for
the page you are on would be different from the rest. See how Google does
it, http://www.google.com/ . Also take a
I've been up late several nights in a row with heavy things on my mind,
so I'll give quick thoughts, try to get some real rest, and hopefully
get tomorrow started right with early-morning devos so I have some free
time in the evening.
My confusion had to do with the fact that many pages are mor
For frontends using RTF (namely the Windows frontend), the only font
that is supported in the current release is Symbol. I've just added
support for Courier, but don't expect it to appear in a released version
for at least a few months.
The more important issue is that you should not be using
Having just looked at the first screen for a very short time, here is what I
have noticed.
Possibly make more of a contrasting color scheme. Example: The top menus
are a muted blue on a blue background. This won't show up well on some
peoples monitors. I had this same comment about my website.
Andrew,
Both (pretty, and expressions of what confused you) are very valuable.
I've demo'd it to a number of people and watched as they pondered what
to do. It makes you want to yell, "Just click on!!!". But I don't
know how to visually lead them to the controls pertinent for each
scree
I think it looks decent (nice and clean, maybe not flashy but certainly not ugly). I
agree it can be a bit confusing on first use. Which was their priority--colors and
graphics or functional UI improvements?
I can do pretty, but slower than any "real" designer. If they're thinking more
funct
Just what should be an obvious correction:
-and are not looking for people to make it look pretty
+and are now looking for people to make it look pretty
Troy A. Griffitts wrote:
Hey guys. We've finished up about 80% of the functionality for the web
tool and are not looking for people to make it
Hey guys. We've finished up about 80% of the functionality for the web
tool and are not looking for people to make it look pretty / work more
intuitively.
ABS is happy with the functionality, but they are about to go out and
pay someone to redesign the user interface. I'd hate for us to have
In the module making tutorial the section on mark-up states the GBF tag
is supported. Is the correct? I can't seem to get it to work. I
want to use it to create a table using a fixed width font. This is how I
use it:
Symbol Name Century Contents Kind of
Text
I made a Commentry m
10 matches
Mail list logo
