I think it looks decent (nice and clean, maybe not flashy but certainly not ugly). I agree it can be a bit confusing on first use. Which was their priority--colors and graphics or functional UI improvements?
I can do pretty, but slower than any "real" designer. If they're thinking more functionally, I could at least express what confused me and offer suggestions for improvement. Andrew On Wednesday, September 17, 2003, at 03:00PM, Troy A. Griffitts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Just what should be an obvious correction: > >-and are not looking for people to make it look pretty >+and are now looking for people to make it look pretty > > >Troy A. Griffitts wrote: >> Hey guys. We've finished up about 80% of the functionality for the web >> tool and are not looking for people to make it look pretty / work more >> intuitively. >> >> ABS is happy with the functionality, but they are about to go out and >> pay someone to redesign the user interface. I'd hate for us to have >> spent so much time on the real meat of the project to offer this as a >> free gift to them, and then they have to go pay someone to add colors >> and graphics. >> >> Any volunteers would be greatly appreciated by ABS and me, as well. >> >> Here's the link: >> >> http://www.crosswire.org/sword/biblenew/ >> >> Thank you for your consideration. >> >> -Troy. >> >> > >_______________________________________________ >sword-devel mailing list >[EMAIL PROTECTED] >http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel > > _______________________________________________ sword-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.crosswire.org/mailman/listinfo/sword-devel
