On Fri, 04 Jan 2013 12:10:54 -0500
Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
> On 01/02/13 16:02, Andrew Turner wrote:
> > The patch looks good. From my reading of [1] the compatible value
> > should be something like "mips,mips4k" as it's value is of the form
> > ",".
> >
> > I have been thinking the best way of
On 01/02/13 16:02, Andrew Turner wrote:
> On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:01:27 +
> "Robert N. M. Watson" wrote:
>
>> On 1 Jan 2013, at 22:08, Andrew Turner wrote:
>>
On a semi-related note: the current obstacle to moving more devices
over to using FDT on BERI is that our FDT implementation ap
On 2 Jan 2013, at 21:02, Andrew Turner wrote:
>> This seemed to do the trick; what do you think of the attached? This
>> isn't a board-specific change, so I dropped it into the common
>> fdt_mips.c code. On the other hand, this left it a bit open as to
>> what the right compatible= line to use wa
On Wed, 2 Jan 2013 11:01:27 +
"Robert N. M. Watson" wrote:
>
> On 1 Jan 2013, at 22:08, Andrew Turner wrote:
>
> >> On a semi-related note: the current obstacle to moving more devices
> >> over to using FDT on BERI is that our FDT implementation appears to
> >> require a PIC to be configure
On 1 Jan 2013, at 22:08, Andrew Turner wrote:
>> On a semi-related note: the current obstacle to moving more devices
>> over to using FDT on BERI is that our FDT implementation appears to
>> require a PIC to be configured. We're not actually using a PIC on
>> BERI currently. It works fine attache
On Tue, 1 Jan 2013 20:56:15 +
"Robert N. M. Watson" wrote:
>
> On 1 Jan 2013, at 19:17, Andrew Turner wrote:
>
> > This looks like it is too late in the boot process. If you are using
> > FDT you will need to use the FDT uart which is initialised in
> > cninit.
>
> On a semi-related note: t
On 1 Jan 2013, at 19:17, Andrew Turner wrote:
> This looks like it is too late in the boot process. If you are using
> FDT you will need to use the FDT uart which is initialised in cninit.
On a semi-related note: the current obstacle to moving more devices over to
using FDT on BERI is that our
On 1 Jan 2013, at 19:17, Andrew Turner wrote:
>> @@ -76,6 +85,17 @@ mips_init(void)
>> {
>> int i;
>>
>> +#ifdef FDT
>> +#ifndef FDT_DTB_STATIC
>> +#error "mips_init with FDT requires FDT_DTB_STATIC"
>> +#endif
>> +
>> +if (OF_install(OFW_FDT, 0) == FALSE)
>> +while (1)
Hi Garrett:
Thanks for the report -- I didn't realise tinderbox was now building all
kernels, or I would have merged my fix from P4 more quickly.
The patch you've attached isn't quite the right one -- BERI supports both FDT
and non-FDT kernels, so we shouldn't build the Openfirmware headers in
On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 11:06:38 + (UTC)
Robert Watson wrote:
> Author: rwatson
> Date: Mon Dec 31 11:06:37 2012
> New Revision: 244899
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244899
>
> Log:
> If FDT is compiled into a FreeBSD/beri kernel, initialise
> OpenFirmware.
> Sponsored by:
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 3:06 AM, Robert Watson wrote:
> Author: rwatson
> Date: Mon Dec 31 11:06:37 2012
> New Revision: 244899
> URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244899
>
> Log:
> If FDT is compiled into a FreeBSD/beri kernel, initialise OpenFirmware.
>
> Sponsored by: DARPA, AFR
Author: rwatson
Date: Mon Dec 31 11:06:37 2012
New Revision: 244899
URL: http://svnweb.freebsd.org/changeset/base/244899
Log:
If FDT is compiled into a FreeBSD/beri kernel, initialise OpenFirmware.
Sponsored by: DARPA, AFRL
Modified:
head/sys/mips/beri/beri_machdep.c
Modified: head/sys/
12 matches
Mail list logo
